Mortgage News Home

Sunday October 12, 2008

Home Page   28,684 Active Members   Register Welcome, Guest    Sign In  

Home

Latest Headlines

Popular Stories

Bookmark Us

Reader Comments

SUBSCRIBE

SEARCH OUR SITE

RSS News

Mortgage Rates
  30 Yr Fix 5.94% -0.16%
  15 Yr Fix 5.63% -0.15%
  1 Yr ARM 5.15% 0.03%
  5/1 ARM 5.90% -0.10%
  30 Yr Tres 4.06% 0.03%
  Fed Prime 5.00% -0.25%
MND Features

- Wiki
- Video News
- Mortgage License Information
- Real Estate License Information
- Mortgage Content Syndication
- Mortgage Fraud
- Housing Bubble
News Archives

Submit A News Tip
or Story Idea
 

Free Subscription To News Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news with our free News Alert Service.


Just One Little House, but a Good Indicator of Foreclosed Properties Nationwide

5590 Views - Printer Friendly - Email This Story To A Friend
 
RSS COMMENTS(8) LINK HERE ADD NEWS TO YOUR WEBSITE

We conducted an unscientific, teeny little survey of foreclosed houses last week - precisely one house - but given the figures we quoted earlier this week about the toll foreclosed homes are taking on cities, neighborhoods, and individual neighbors - we are willing to bet that what we saw in Darien, Georgia can be extrapolated to portray hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes nationwide.

And what we see is how the policies of lenders and their real estate agents are making the foreclosure situation worse than it needs to be.

The scenario: my daughter, an experienced renovator, spotted a foreclosed house for sale on the Internet and asked me to visit it with her. When she called the agent (an out-of-town agent with no other listing in Darien) she was told the house was unlocked; to see it at her leisure so we drove to Darien, a charming up-and-coming seacoast town where much private money has been spent upgrading Victorian and Craftsman era bungalows around a couple of vest-pocket versions of Georgia's famous Oglethorpe "squares."


Our target wasn't in that sort of rarified neighborhood, but rather smack-dab in the middle of a "mixed area." Starting next door and running to the east were nicely maintained and landscaped brick ranches of 1,800 sf or so. Starting next door and running west was a deplorable collection of trailers - sometimes dropped three or four to a lot in violation of code, and few in decent repair. Our foreclosure had moved blight one address east.

As advertised, the house, a large ranch on an oversized lot, was open; an abortive home improvement project had left a gaping hole into what used to be a garage, making locking the front door a little futile. The plumbing appeared to be intact - it wasn't copper - but the electrical wiring had been stripped out of at least the "under construction" portion of the house.

Inside there was furniture everywhere. A broken table, china closet, and chairs in the dining room, a legless upholstered chair and couch in what appeared to be a family room; a queen-sized mattress on the floor in another room, and garbage everywhere. It appeared that the furniture had belonged to the previous owner but it is only a matter of time before squatters move in their mattresses and cots and do further damage.

The former garage which had been cut into a number of small rooms with unfinished partitions, was impassable, especially as the only light - the power was off - filtered in through the big hole and one or two tiny windows.

Nowhere in the house could I locate a card for the agent or a listing sheet containing any information such as the taxes on the property or its age. The agent's website had said "no representations," but come on - the amount of the taxes? Save the prospective buyer a little effort - Lord knows you are doing nothing else to earn your commission.

Seeing the house - and driving around the small community to check the status of other vacant and/or foreclosed properties - raised a lot of questions.

Is the bank aware of what is happening to its owned real estate under the care of this agent or hundreds other like him? Does the bank make any attempt at property management?

Our guess is that the property was foreclosed by a large servicer located far away from Darien and once the foreclosure was complete the house joined thousands of others down in that crack they all were allowed to fall through. There is no doubt a department with nominal responsibility for property management but it is probably limited to locating a local broker and assigning the listing.

In the article we published last week on the cost of foreclosures we listed line items for clean-up, minor repairs, and property maintenance totaling 3 percent of the value of the property. Is this real money or only items that the banks claim to spend then charge against foreclosure losses so that they become tax write-offs? If so, isn't this fraud?

Was our real estate agent given any kind of allowance to cover securing, protecting, and maintaining the property or is he expected to cover all expenses out of his commission? Commissions in Southeast Georgia are generally 7 percent so the agent isn't going to make much even if he does sell the property before squatters burn it down.

But we are only talking about maybe $200 to board up the hole in the garage and install a new lock on the front door and maybe $500 to haul away the trash and leave the house "broom clean." Leaving the power on would cost only a few dollars a month and would improve both the security of the property and the safety of prospective buyers. A property that looks as though someone is taking an interest in it is much less likely to be vandalized than one that is obviously abandoned.

There is another villain to this piece. In addition to the owner and the agent, the town itself should take an interest in its decaying neighborhoods. The code enforcement division of city government could write up a dozen infractions of local ordinances (we didn't mention earlier that there is also an abandoned pool on the property) and hit the property owner with some fines. That would get somebody's attention in Charlotte or Des Moines. If local governments don't have enough clout to go after the banks, perhaps it is past time for the state legislatures to do so.

For example; in the early 1990's there were hundreds of foreclosures in New England and, because of the type of wild lending that had gone on five years earlier, these actions were focused on condominiums and were largely done by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) on behalf of failed banks. While they would never admit it, it was the FDIC's policy to ignore the homeowner's associations and their fees. In some complexes the numbers of FDIC owned units soon topped 60 percent and the cash strapped HOA's, unable to fix leaky roofs or even pay for master insurance policies began to sue FDIC unit by unit to collect past due fees.

Then someone got the idea to approach the Great and General Court and within months the Commonwealth had a senior lien law that permitted HOAs to lien units for unpaid fees. These senior liens could not be wiped out by a foreclosure and the HOA could itself foreclose on its lien and eliminate the first mortgage on the property. The FDIC was suddenly very interested in paying those fees and the law went a long way to stop the deterioration of the condo complexes.

If the states did the same - giving senior lien status to fines for unsecured or unsafe buildings for example - it would give the cities and towns a potent weapon to use against lenders in preventing further deterioration to neighborhoods.

In the meantime, we are still amazed that banks are willing to allow their owned real estate to deteriorate to the point of having no value rather than spend a few thousand dollars preventively and that there are real estate agents out there who have so little pride in their services.



Story Views: 5590 | Permalink

Story Tools



Email This Story To A Friend

Subscribe To News Alerts
 

Related Tags

Select a Tag for more information related to that Tag. (View All Tags)
 
foreclosures housing market

 

Comments (8)

Post Comment Comments RSS


REgan Economics at its best If the old guy was in power today, his approach would have been inverted. Common Sense approach of offering all owner occupied property owners a special loan mod allowing a payment not based on ltv, but based on income verified by a 4506 and bank statements for 12 months yeilding a 33% debt to income ratio. The defered payment would have been kept in a special escrow account for a term defined by the owner not the lender or until the house sells in the future. Homeowners keep their hope based on average of 10 years before they move up in a new property. By the way, equity always returns in its new cycle. If this were in effect Jan 2008, foreclosures and non performance would cease to exist. The first of the following month, all financial systems will be in full working order. Excess cash will be spread thruout the land, restaurants busy again, shoppers return to do their stuff, 6dollars a gallon for the fillup,, "no biggy". vacationers on the highways, health insurance pricing would be affordable. The dollar prices ahead of the Euro. The return of Private Label. If only FNMA's debt to income ratios are finally understood moving foward.

Above Posted By: management | Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:06:43 EST

I work for one of the large banks as a loan officer and the problem is corporate mentality and the many layers of vice-presidents who have to justify their position in the company. We spend more time on nonsense e-mails and webanars than trying to find new business. I can see where banks who own foreclosures can mess up because the chain of command is so long there's no way anything productive is going to happen with a vacant property. My company, at least, has lost touch with the real world as we are mired in regulations that do nothing for the consumer, only justify the corporate ranks existence.

Above Posted By: njdlmkr | Sat, 7 Jun 2008 05:15:30 EST

With reference to anonymous,yes not all real estate agents, but many of them unethical, they offices were used as a one stop one shop, e.g banking ,appraisal, title attorney etc, sold homes as is,( 6%comm) demanded kickbacks Greed or -no business to anyone they did busness with -their sold clients homes with major defects ( heating systems,bad roofs,crack foundations etc), the clients had to take an equity loan or private loan through contractors to correct the problems, more debt for the client besides the 1st & 2nd mortgage. This industry has been getting a free ride, free of blame in this crisis,and it is time their are investigated, some Mortgage Brokers has been corrupt, but most barely made 2% comm, but yet these RE agents expected you to share with them what ever little was made. The mortgage brokers has been taking the major hit for all the ills in an industry where the banks, appraisers, wall street has been free of blame most of the time. (Should a car sales man be blamed for the way Gm cars are made) Loans were presented to the underwriters, they underwrte the loans, whatever happen after the loan was sold is a matter for the banks and Wall street as to way they were packeged as securities. Today some banks and SOME in the real estate industry and many corrupt investors are working hand in hand , many of the same investors who over inflated rip the industry off with their practises,the banks are still doing business with them, so the problems willl never stop.

Above Posted By: Barry | Sat, 7 Jun 2008 02:49:07 EST

Have you ever been to Detroit, Buffalo, Baltimore or any midwest or northeast city that lost significant population (40% or more) in the 1960s and 1970s. What those cities looked like in the late 70s and the 80s is similar to what you are describing in this article, only the architecture is different. For example Detroit has many borded up houses that appear to be relatively large and probably belonged at one time (through the 50s and early 60s) to relatively high paid people who worked for the auto companies. What happened was that as demand for housing declined, the value of the houses declined to an amount below the mortage and subsequent owners abandoned the properties. Mortgage holders refused to foreclose and taxes were not paid, so the city became the default owner. The problem was that the city did not have the resources to maintain the properties it now owned, an no-one wanted to buy them, so they became weed infested crack houses.

Above Posted By: Anonymous | Fri, 6 Jun 2008 20:59:06 EST

I agree with Kevin, how can you possibly generalize all REO real estate agents from all over the country because of this one property? Wow it is published media articles like this that bring the entire indudstry down. I am a hard working REO agent who spends 18 hours a day trying to keep up with these foreclosures and short sales. We have to pay for all the clean up and maintenance up front and WAIT 30 days to get paid by the banks who own them. Why don't you check around in other real estate markets across the U.S. before lumping all of us together as "non caring" real estate agents!!!

Above Posted By: REO Agent in California | Fri, 6 Jun 2008 20:57:43 EST

The lenders have no one to blame but themselves. Georgia has the worst lending laws next to AK. The original home owner probably went though a morgtage broker in Califorina who was able to get an inflated appraisal on the property for $250.00. A scam loan was sold to the home owner and when the payments almost doubled the home owner could not pay and the home was forclosed. The bank being cheap got a BPO from the Realtor for $35 instead of getting an appraisal from a good appraiser for $350. The bank has no idea of the real worth of the property and realy does not want to know. They have gotten thier fees and that is all they care about. There is no code/zoning or enforcment in south Georgia you folks must be from up north. Costs to secure the place and remove the trash would be less then $200. The banks still do not want to pay that. These banks are making money on these forclosures or they would not be doing them. If good laws were in place and enforced the bank would not have been able to make the scam loan to the homeowner and the homowner would problaly still be in the home. I am a Real Estate Appraiser down here in south Georgia I see this kind of thing all the time.

Above Posted By: Steve Metz | Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:48:21 EST

Thank you for your expose! I could not agree more. We live in an upscale community (housing prices are 6-7 hundred thousand) in Phoenix, AZ and we have a foreclosure that is listed far below those figures. The current condition of the front and back yards make it impossible for the lender to get even their undervalued price and they don't care, unbelievable! These banks that were there when prices were on the rise and we were willing to mortgage ours and our children's futures to them, don't seem to have the same level of interest in our community now that some of the responsibility has been transferred to them. Again, thanks for bringing this to everyone's attention.

Above Posted By: Kevin Burk | Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:06:45 EST

I wish these articles would stop generalizing. I am a real estate agent who handles REO properties in my state along with many other agents and I haven't found one property yet that is unsecure, that's the first thing that is done. I tried to see one last week and was told I couldn't because they had to get someone in to take the boards off the door. One incident doesn't not account for all. PLEASE STOP LUMPING ALL states, local real estate market, real estate agents, brokers, etc. into one big ball. There are differences on all those levels.

Above Posted By: Anonymous | Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:44:26 EST


Post A Comment

Please fill out the form below to submit a comment.

Name: 
(Required - Type Anonymous or Use First Name Only if Private)
Email Address: 
(Not Required So No Fake Emails Please.)
URL or Weblog:
(Leave Blank If You Don't Have One - Use http://)
Comments: 
(Please keep comments on topic. No HTML Allowed. No Advertisng.)
Please Note: Due to Comment Spam, all comments are reviewed by hand. Most comments will appear shortly after submission but it may take up to 12 hours to appear. If you would like to come back, click here to Bookmark the page.
PLEASE DO NOT USE ALL CAPS


Character Count =     (5000 Character Limit)

If you would like to leave a longer comment, please submit your comments in 5000 character increments and we will merge your comments.
Notify me via email when my comment is approved.


Note: Please don't bother spamming. All submissions are reviewed by our our editorial staff. Comment spam and irrelevant links will not be approved.

 




NEW VIDEO
Bush on Credit Crisis
Credit Crunch Hits Chicago Cubs


Reader Comments (More)
I'm sorry. I should listen to him because? In my book the Federal Reserve is a Private institution. I question the authority given...
Read
Another good informative article. Keep up the good work MND. My overall opinion is that this takeover is harmful to us as individu...
Read
Considering all that has happened now.....FYI Did you all know that next year, over 14 million homeowners will realize that they h...
Read
Home - Contact - Sitemap - Disclaimer - Privacy Statement - Advertising
All Content Copyright © 2003 - 2008 Brown House Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form without the express written permission of MortgageNewsDaily.com is prohibited.