Mortgage News Home

Saturday May 17, 2008

Home Page   24,327 Active Members   Register Welcome, Guest    Sign In  

Home

Latest Headlines

Popular Stories

Bookmark Us

Reader Comments

SUBSCRIBE

SEARCH OUR SITE

RSS News

Mortgage Rates
  30 Yr Fix 6.01% -0.04%
  15 Yr Fix 5.60% 0.00%
  1 Yr ARM 5.18% -0.11%
  5/1 ARM 5.57% -0.10%
  30 Yr Tres 4.58% -0.06%
  Fed Prime 5.00% -0.25%
MND Features

- Wiki
- Video News
- Mortgage License Information
- Real Estate License Information
- Mortgage Content Syndication
- Mortgage Fraud
- Housing Bubble
News Archives

Submit A News Tip
or Story Idea
 

Free Subscription To News Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news with our free News Alert Service.


PMI Deduction Buried In The Closing Acts Of Congress

57452 Views - Printer Friendly - Email This Story To A Friend
 
RSS COMMENTS(8) LINK HERE ADD NEWS TO YOUR WEBSITE

== 1/29/2007 -Update - "An Update on PMI Tax Deductions" ==

It has not been widely reported, but late in the closing session of the 109th Congress which adjourned this past weekend may have been a bit of good news for homeowners.

In a last minute flurry of votes Congress approved the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006. As has been widely reported, the act was a mare's nest of "earmarks," amendments, and attachments among which were extensions to a number of earlier tax breaks that were due to or had already expired. Most of these were designed for the benefit of businesses small and large but the bill also included trade protection legislation and new laws relating to health care.


Buried deep within the Act at Section 419 was a one page attachment entitled "Premiums for Mortgage Insurance." Tracking Congressional legislation requires more than a helicopter and a pack of search dogs. While there are a number of web sites - some government sponsored others operated by brave private individuals and organizations - following a bill from introduction to enactment is a morass. We can, after six hours on line guarantee nothing about what is to follow except the following.

The original legislation was introduced in the House in 2005 by Congresspersons Paul Ryan (D-WI), William J. Jefferson (D-LA), and Eric Cantor (R-VA) as HR 3098 and in the Senate by Senators Gordon Smith (R-OR) and Blanche Lincoln (D, AR) as S 132.

The Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 as presented to the House contained the following wording, very similar to that in the above referenced bills as Section 419:

Section 6050H of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to mortgage interest) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

In general.--Premiums paid or accrued for qualified mortgage insurance by a taxpayer during the taxable year in connection with acquisition indebtedness with respect to a qualified residence of the taxpayer shall be treated for purposes of this section as interest which is qualified residence interest.

The Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 was, by media accounts, passed by both the House and the Senate but has not yet been signed by President Bush.

Beyond that, even The Congressional Record as of Dec. 12 could not provide definitive information as to the final form of the bill as it was passed but all indications are that the PMI amendment was included.

Basically this means that those homeowners who put down less than 20 percent of the purchase price in securing a mortgage can now deduct the cost of the private mortgage insurance (PMI) they were required to purchase to protect their mortgage lender in the event of default. This amount can now be treated as mortgage interest by itemizers when filing Schedule A of the federal tax return.

With monthly PMI payments tending to run in the vicinity of $100 or more per month this will be bit of a help to homeowners who are using all of their interest rate deduction but still owing income taxes. There was a cap in the original legislation in which the amount that could be written off begins to decline incrementally when income reaches $100K, but this seems to have disappeared in the final bill.

This is good news for many taxpayers but the legislation was, of course, designed more to benefit private mortgage insurers which have been lobbying for such a change for some time. Once home buyers and loan officers caught on to a little wrinkle that allowed buyers to avoid PMI by using blended or piggy-back mortgages the use of PMI and thus the profits of the companies that write it plummeted. Blended mortgages allowed borrowers without a 20 percent down payment to take out a home equity line or a traditional second mortgage simultaneous with a first mortgage to provide the necessary down payment. This form of financing has a number of benefits (Check the archives on this site for several articles on PMI in August and September 2005) but one of them was that the interest on the junior mortgage payments (with some limits) was deductible.

Passing such a bill does not mean that everything will proceed as written. The IRS will issue regulations interpreting the act and hopefully this will be done in time for the April 15 filing deadline. If you are responsible for paying PMI make sure that your tax professional is aware of this new legislation and understands how it may result in a slightly lower price tag on the bottom line of your 1040.

== 1/29/2007 -Update - "An Update on PMI Tax Deductions" ==



Story Views: 57452 | Permalink

Story Tools



Email This Story To A Friend

Subscribe To News Alerts
 

Related Tags

Select a Tag for more information related to that Tag. (View All Tags)
 

 

Comments (8)

Post Comment Comments RSS


Everywhere I read the PMI tax deduction has been extended through 2010 as part of the mortgage debt relief act of 2007.

Above Posted By: Sonia | Wed, 19 Mar 2008 07:49:28 EST

If you were offered these two options for a 100% financed mortgage, which would you take? One mortgage with no PMI at a rate of 7.5% monthly payment $1425 vs. One mortgage with PMI at a rate of 6.375% monthly payment $1436.45

Above Posted By: C. | Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:22:26 EST

tcook- The reason 2nd mortgage rates have gotten so high is bc investors are not buying them on the secondary market because homeowners are not paying on them. Because it is in 2nd lien position there is little they can do to get their money since the 1st lien gets paid off first. Guidelines to get 100% CLTV have also gotten really tight. With the rates on 2nds being as high as they are you may want 1 loan with pmi just to save money. Both options should be presented to the client either way

Above Posted By: Sandra | Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:58:29 EST

Why is it that mortgage brokers are now saying that the piggy back loan(20% loan) is carrying a crazy interest rate of 16% or more so you HAVE to take the PMI on one loan and tax deduct the insurance. Otherwise you will loose big time. This information came from a reputable Las Vegas mortgage broker.

Above Posted By: tcook | Sat, 8 Sep 2007 00:24:07 EST

It should be noted that congress needs to renew this bill. So far this deduction is not for the life of the loan, just for loans written in 2007 and for 2007 only.

Above Posted By: Dusty | Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:24:54 EST

Obviously, the PMI companies have a strong lobbyist. By obtaining tax deductibilty for their premiums they effectively lowered the cost of their insurance to the home purchaser by 25% to 30% without touching their own bottom line. Nice move, PMI, GE, MGIC and the rest!

The important thing to remember is that the final cost of PMI still adds .25% to as much as 1% to the entire 1st mortgage. A knowledgeable mortgage broker can help you calculate which is better - PMI or piggyback 2nd mtge.

Above Posted By: Ron Borg | Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:31:46 EST

It took me hours to find something on this subject. I'm a taxpreparer & searched the IRS website for info on how & where to report the deduction but couldn't find anything except where to report PMI for rental property. Thanks I'll be sure to keep u in my favorites!

Above Posted By: scoot | Sun, 7 Jan 2007 21:27:03 EST

Why has there been no reporting on this from major new orgs? This is really important to the housing industry.

Above Posted By: mdc | Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:05:03 EST


Post A Comment

Please fill out the form below to submit a comment.

Name: 
(Required - Type Anonymous or Use First Name Only if Private)
Email Address: 
(Not Required So No Fake Emails Please.)
URL or Weblog:
(Leave Blank If You Don't Have One - Use http://)
Comments: 
(Please keep comments on topic. No HTML Allowed. No Advertisng.)
Please Note: Due to Comment Spam, all comments are reviewed by hand. Most comments will appear shortly after submission but it may take up to 12 hours to appear. If you would like to come back, click here to Bookmark the page.
PLEASE DO NOT USE ALL CAPS


Character Count =     (5000 Character Limit)

If you would like to leave a longer comment, please submit your comments in 5000 character increments and we will merge your comments.
Notify me via email when my comment is approved.


Note: Please don't bother spamming. All submissions are reviewed by our our editorial staff. Comment spam and irrelevant links will not be approved.

 



NEW VIDEO
A New Civil War in Banking
Atlanta Fed President on Banking


Reader Comments (More)
Credit agencies are simply wharehouses of information. They only report what has been reported to them. I think the focus should b...
Read
What is accomplished here? Does the Fed's think those with poorer credit management should be given the same options as an excelle...
Read
Well for what I've seen lately, the lenders are taking up to six months to approve a "short sale" and by the time it is approved, ...
Read
Home - Contact - Sitemap - Disclaimer - Privacy Statement - Advertising
All Content Copyright © 2003 - 2008 Brown House Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form without the express written permission of MortgageNewsDaily.com is prohibited.