Learn. Share. Connect. (51,917 Members)  - Join
 


Site Tools

Join Now or Sign In
for Full Access to All Features
Mortgage Rates
30 Yr FRM 4.98% -0.05%
15 Yr FRM 4.40% -0.06%
1 Yr ARM 4.47% -0.10%
5/1 Yr ARM 4.35% -0.07%
30 YR Tres 4.40% -0.01%
Fed Prime 3.25% 0.00%
Receive Free Email Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news and blog posts with our free News Alert Service

An Update on PMI Tax Deductions

by Glenn Setzer on
 Email Page (New!)   |     Print   |     Bookmark

In December we published an article about a provision in the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 which was passed in the waning days of the 109th Congress (December 12, PMI Deduction Buried in the Closing Acts of Congress.) The bill, H.R. 6111 contained, among dozens of other provisions and a boxcar of earmarks and pieces of pork, a section that would provide some tax relief to homeowners who were obliged, by virtue of down payments of less than 20 percent on their homes, to carry private mortgage insurance (PMI.)

At that time the final version of the bill was not publicly available, nor is it now, but here is an update and the news is not quite as good for the taxpayer as it first appeared.

The House overwhelmingly approved H.R. 6111 on December 8 and the Senate passed corresponding legislation on December 9. The President signed the bill, probably on December 20, and it is now known as Public Law Number 109-432. As of January 25 the Government Printing Office had not produced a final printed copy of the bill.

At the time of our original article we noted that H.R. 6111 appeared to include provisions from H.R. (which stands for House Resolution) 6408 and Senate 132. At the time it was presented to the House in early December it contained the following wording in Section 419:

Section 6050H of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to mortgage interest) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

In general.--Premiums paid or accrued for qualified mortgage insurance by a taxpayer during the taxable year in connection with acquisition indebtedness with respect to a qualified residence of the taxpayer shall be treated for purposes of this section as interest which is qualified residence interest.

We are relying on information on the law as signed by President Bush provided by BNA Tax Management a tax advisory site. According to BNA the following restrictions apply to what seemed like a general deduction for homeowners for private mortgage insurance premiums. These may have come about during conferences to resolve differences between House and Senate versions or may have been earlier defined by Section 6050H of the IRS Code to which Section 419 was appended.

The Act defines qualified mortgage insurance as that provided by the VA, the FHA, or the Rural Housing Administration or by private carriers and specifies that it be treated as interest on a qualified residence. This, however, is modified by the following "that premiums paid or accrued for qualified mortgage insurance by a taxpayer during the taxable year in connection with acquisition indebtedness." This is interpreted by BNA as meaning that the deduction is only available to homeowners who assume PMI payments during 2007. In other words, you may not qualify for the deduction if you bought a house subject to PMI in 2006 or earlier even though you are currently paying premiums.

Deductions seem to be further limited to 2007 by the following: no benefit will currently accrue to taxpayers for any amount paid or accrued beyond December 31 of this year "or properly allocable to any period after that date." We are not lawyers or tax authorities and we advise you, strongly, to consult your own tax professional, but it appears that this deduction is only available to taxpayers during the current calendar year and that paying premiums ahead as taxpayers are often advised to do with mortgage interest or property taxes at year end when deductions are needed will not work in this situation.

As we stated in our earlier article, the original House and Senate legislation was income-limited to $100,000 per household (or $50,000 for married homeowners filing separately) ' a provision that appeared to disappear from the bill that was finally voted on in December. BNA, however, states that this provision did survive into the final version and that the allowable deduction for PMI is phased out by 10 percent for each $1000 the taxpayers adjusted gross income exceeds $100,000 (or every $500 above $50,000 for the married who file separately.) This would mean that the deduction is not available for anyone with adjusted income exceeding $110,000 or $55,000.

So, it appears that few homebuyers will be eligible to use this PMI deduction and that it will only be available for 12 months. It seems strange that Congress would pass such limited legislation and interpretations could be different as corresponding IRS regulations are written. Still, if you buy a house or refinance this year make a mental note to alert your tax advisor to check on this small perk before you file for the tax year ending December 31, 2007.


Comments

Join Now or Login to Post Comments

Rick Grand
on
This is an interesting tidbit to let my clients know about. So if I'm reading this thing correctly it is only valid for people who purchase/refi during the 2007 calender and as of January 1st, 2008 it will no longer be allowed...kind of odd to do but what the government does is always odd. I understand people previous to 2007 not being allowed to take advantage of it.
Rebekah Gamble
on
It seems to me that the PMI deduction provision for 2007 would only be available for purchase money mortages, not refinances, due to the verbage "in connection with acquisition indebtedness". It may be further limited than you have reported.
km
on
Actually, it's not as bad as you are portraying. New tax laws being put in for one year is very common and it will almost definitely be extended (remember it's an election year and no lawmaker is going to take something away from homebuyers). Actually, mortgage interest was introduced this way. Also, the R&D tax credit has been this way since 1985, extended every year. Also, NAR recently said that 86% of first time buyers make less than 100k. Also, it DOES apply to refis, just not cashout.
Lynn
on
As a Tax Professional and Mortgage Broker, I would have to agree with "km"'s comment. Most tax credits when first introduced are supposedly only for a limited time but then they are extended. I would caution my client that it COULD just be for the year of 2007 but in my heart I really do think it will continue. That's just my 2 cents worth! Thanks
Mary Supinger
on
I would be hard pressed to advise a client to go this route, at least for the year of 2007. I would want the law to actually be approved for the deduction beyond 2007. Years ago, lenders offered borrowers the ability to "tack on" the mortgage insurance premium into the actual interest rate on the loan. This would make the premium tax deductible as it would be interest paid on a mortgage. Let's hope that lenders will bring that bell/whistle back to the mortgage market
John
on
Actually Mary, that does still exist! It is called "Tax Advantage Mortgage Insurance" (TAMI for short). Essentially, a borrower takes a slightly higher rate and is not charged a traditional PMI factor. Since home mortgage interest is tax deductible (consult your tax advisor), the PMI is converted into interest, and is now deductible. It beats traditional PMI in almost every single scenario.
Jeff
on
>It beats traditional PMI in almost every single scenario. John, actually it doesn't. With TAMI or lender paid PMI, that cost sticks with buyer for the full term of the mortgage. With traditional PMI, the extra cost is typically paid off within a 7-9 year timeframe.
Mike
on
Can a buyer have a seller pre-pay the PMI policy, or the buyer pre-pay the policy so the entire PMI for the loan is deductable in 2007, instead of spreading out the premiums beyond 2007?
Ricardo Cobos
on
Is PMI Tax Deductible? There has been a lot of talk about whether or not PMI is tax deductible lately. In fact I recall a minor news blurb in the waning days of 2006 where they mentioned that President Bush had signed a bill that made law the PMI was deductible as mortgage interest. However, when you try to research the topic, there appears to be conflicting information out there about it. Does anyone know authoritatively what the law says and please provide the talking points.
Grant
on
Can you refi 20% of the original cost of the loan and then ask for the PMI to be dropped. I was under the impression that if you refinanced for 15 years and paid it off early it would be better than paying the cost of pmi which in no way benefits you the borrower
Anonymous
on
What an outrage! God forbid the government gives any relief to homeowners who got suckered in by the low interest bait and switch scam of Bush's first term.
Irvin Wilson
on
It should be noted that PMI is tax deductible on investment (rental) properties just like any other expense. This is a common misconception and has nothing to do with the legislation spoke of here. I can't put html in this comment but if you go to the IRS website (irs.gov) and search for PMI you'll see proof from the IRS itself.
Irvin Wilson
on
link to IRS article regarding PMI is http://www.irs.gov/faqs/faq11-2.html if this can be imbedded in the comment. - irv
Marianne
on
I agree with Irvin. What about the rest of us who purchased our homes or refinanced prior to 2007? What is being done to extend this relief to all Americans? Note, the folks who are experiencing hardships due to declining FMV, adjustable rates, predatory lending and exotic loan products are not the people who purchased or refinanced in 2007. This doesn't make any sense!!!
Debbie
on
Its pretty sad our goverment cant seem to do anything for its citizens.....if you have PMI insurance as of 2007 and only 2007 you got a tax break ...wow ...such a help for everyone struggling to pay it...as high as 258.00 a month it should be illegal...at that rate it seems to cause more hardship on keeping a mortgage current....but thats the goverment does nothing beneficial it wouldnt want to hurt those big companies .........
Cyndee
on
Why do we have PMI and who does it protect?
Bobby
on
The PMI tax deduction has been extended. So everyone bashing the government needs to tone it down and relax. If you don't want to pay PMI or get stuck with a higher rate from TAMI, then learn to save some money and put 20% down. There are many at fault for this mortgage environment, but the consumer society we have because is partially to blame. Stop buying the latest technology or the little bit more expensive cars.
Gordon
on
Does anyone know what the PMI rate is per 100,000?
Rex
on
I purchased a house in 2006 and I did not put 20 % down. This is my second house I have purchased in my 20 years of being in the Marine Corps. My question to anyone.......It is now 2008 and I was told by my neighbor that my tax preparer should have filled out a form to claim my PMI, is this correct? Also, I was told if my house appraises for a certain amount, I could have my PMI drop, unfortunately with the market the way it is, my house will not appraise anyone know of any other way for me eliminate my PMI? I am still learning all of this, so please bare with my ignorance. Thank you for your time and answers in advance.
missy
on
I've been trying to research this PMI deduction and can't find any definitive answers to our situation. We just purchased a second home to use as rent for profit as well as the 14 days allowed for personal use. We only put 15% down and the mortgage company is telling us that PMI is a tax deduction. From what I read on irs.gov, if your AGI is more than 109K the PMI cannot be added into your basis and would not be deductible. Also, if the PMI is related to a second home, it's not deductible...can anyone verify if that's true?