MBS Live: MBS Afternoon Market Summary
There's not much to discuss this afternoon as far as organic market motivations are concerned.  That's a funny way of saying that the "stuff" that would normally cause Fannie 3.0s to rally 5/8ths of a point in one day isn't present in today's rally.  Not only was the day lacking in significant sources of motivation, but all of the leading candidates to fill such a role, merely stuck their oars in the water beneath a boat that was already moving.  In other words, the extent to which the decent five year auction or relatively friendly comments from Fed's Rosengren aided our cause, is unclear.  In stark contrast, it's excruciatingly clear that there was a big nasty sell-off yesterday, and that the month of May has been one gigantic, big, nasty sell-off for bond markets.  That's the story today, or rather, the fact that even the nastiest, fire-breathing-est sell-offs still take time to inhale periodically between sessions of more determined conflagration and suffering, is the story.  Funny thing about watching a fire-breathing dragon inhale after it just incinerated your village: you can never be sure that it's not just gathering more oxygen to get the rest of the fire out of its belly (disclaimer: I don't know how dragons make fire).  Not only that, but even if we're not immediately zapped tomorrow morning, it'll be hard to make a case for rebuilding the village until this damn dragon leaves and flies far enough away.  Scouts report that the dragon would have to reach the other side of weaker-than-expected NFP print next week in order for it to make sense to get hopes up about restoring our once mighty village to its former glory.  Even if that never happens, there may be a chance or two for glory(or escape) between now and then.
MBS Pricing Snapshot
Pricing shown below is delayed, please note the timestamp at the bottom. Real time pricing is available via MBS Live.
FNMA 3.0
100-27 : +0-18
FNMA 3.5
103-28 : +0-12
FNMA 4.0
105-21 : +0-07
FNMA 4.5
106-31 : +0-04
GNMA 3.0
102-01 : +0-19
GNMA 3.5
105-08 : +0-10
GNMA 4.0
106-18 : +0-06
GNMA 4.5
106-31 : -0-04
FHLMC 3.0
100-14 : +0-17
FHLMC 3.5
103-20 : +0-11
FHLMC 4.0
105-13 : +0-07
FHLMC 4.5
106-03 : +0-02
Pricing as of 4:04 PM EST
Afternoon Reprice Alerts and Updates
Below is a recap of instant Reprice Alerts and updates issued via email and text alert to MBS Live subscribers this afternoon.

1:51PM  :  CFPB finalizes amendments to ability-to-repay rule
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) finalized rules to facilitate access to credit by creating specific exemptions and modifications to the CFPB’s Ability-to-Repay rule for small creditors, community development lenders, and housing stabilization programs. The amendments also revised rules on how to calculate loan origination compensation for certain purposes. Today’s final rule amends the CFPB’s Ability-to-Repay rule, which was finalized in January of this year.

“Our Ability-to-Repay rule was crafted to promote responsible lending practices,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Today’s amendments embody our efforts to make reasonable changes to the rule in order to foster access to responsible credit for consumers.”

The CFPB finalized its Ability-to-Repay rule on January 10, 2013. The Ability-to-Repay rule established that most new mortgages must comply with basic requirements that protect consumers from taking on loans they do not have the financial means to pay back. Lenders are presumed to have complied with the Ability-to-Repay rule if they issue “Qualified Mortgages” (QMs). These loans must meet certain requirements including prohibitions or limitations on the risky features that harmed consumers in the recent mortgage crisis. If a lender makes a Qualified Mortgage, consumers have greater assurance that they can pay back the loan.
1:39PM  :  Fed's Rosengren on QE: Benefits Still Significantly Outweigh Costs
"Benefits of this accommodative monetary policy program still significantly outweigh the costs. While some improvement in labor markets has been achieved, it does not yet constitute progress sufficient to merit halting the asset purchase program."

"As for the costs, the Fed is and should be very attuned to unintended consequences – and is intently monitoring an array of asset prices, including stock prices, housing prices, and other widely held assets. At this point it seems that fundamentals are prevailing, and potential costs are well contained."

I also believe that the Federal Reserve should make adjustments to the program based on economic outcomes – that if the economy and the outlook improve, the rate of purchases could be gradually reduced, rather than suddenly stopped once we have achieved substantial improvement in labor markets. By the way, a reduction is one possibility, but of course adjustments could be down or up – because if the incoming economic data do not reflect improvements consistent with both elements of our dual mandate, I believe the Fed should be willing to increase asset purchases. "

"Changing the flow of purchases does not necessarily yield, in the end, a smaller central bank balance sheet. "

"In terms of monetary policy, it would in my view be premature to stop the Fed’s large-scale asset purchase program at this time. I believe the Fed should continue the purchase program until we see more sustained improvement in labor markets and have greater confidence that the economic recovery is sufficiently self-sustaining to yield continued progress in reducing the still very high unemployment rate. "

"The bottom line is that we really need to see the economy grow, as I hope and expect, more quickly than at the 2.1 percent growth rate it has averaged over the recovery. Faster growth is essential to attaining inflation and employment outcomes consistent with the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate from Congress – and more broadly for the economic wellbeing of the many Americans who have struggled through a long and slow recovery."
1:16PM  :  Bond Markets Rallying After Auction
MBS and Treasuries took a few deep breaths after the 5yr auction came in broadly in line with previous averages and then began to rally. 10's broke a resistance floor that had been giving them some trouble earlier this morning (and even right up until the auction) and it looks like we're off to the races since then.

That was about 3 minutes ago and MBS are up another 5 ticks and change with Fannie 3.0s up 15 on the day at 100-24 and Fannie 3.5s up 9 ticks at 103-25. Positive reprices are more likely at these levels if we hold them. 10's are down nearly 4 bps on the day at 2.13.
12:38PM  :  Duration Catching a Bid Ahead of 5yr Auction. Lower Coupons Rallying
At present, 5yr yields are net negative on the day while 30yr yields are about 6 bps lower. This is yield curve 'flattening,' and it is happening in response to the massive amounts of steepening seen so far in May and especially yesterday.

Whether rates will ultimately bounce at yesterday's highs or continue higher, these pauses for consolidation tend to happen either way. Frequently, they result in improvements from the weakest points of the previous session. Fannie 3.5's would need to break 103-24 before this would be anything more than a consolidative move.

That said, the consolidative move isn't a bad thing for now. 3.5's are up 5 ticks at 103-21 and Fannie 3.0s are up 11 ticks at 100-20. One positive reprice has been reported and more are possible, but not likely to be widespread at current levels.

The 5yr auction is coming up at 1pm and is a bit tricky, as it speaks to the "belly" of the curve (vs the "long end" or "short end," referring to 10yr and 30yr yields vs 3yr and 2yr yields respectively). Given the current state of flux in the MBS Coupon stack, the auction results may merely serve to affect the spread between Fannie 3.0s and 3.5s more so than the outright trading levels.
Live Chat Featured Comments
A recap of the featured comments from the MBS Live Dashboard's Live Chat feature, utilized by hundreds of industry professionals each day.

Jason Adams  :  "The borrower does pay in the form of a higher rate. That seems to be the confusion"
Michael Gillani  :  "It is also not calculated in the APR"
Michael Gillani  :  "It is not a fee though and the borrower is not paying it."
Troy Evans  :  "It does fall into the 3% cap"
Michael Gillani  :  "So for brokers, the lender paid comp to the broker entity does or does not fall into the 3%. I was under the impression that it did not."
John Paul Mulchay  :  "On the comp rule, items that fall into APR would be considered against the 3% cap, yes?"
Ken Crute  :  "REPRICE: 2:44 PM - Everbank Better"
Scott Valins  :  "this falls under the QM rule Jeff. Originating QMs doesn't exempt you from this rule"
Jeff Yuna  :  "i think the key is "qualified mortgages" even brokers are selling qualified mortgages the majority of the time"
Scott Valins  :  "after further analysis, I think pretty much all 3rd party fees are exempt from the 3% rule"
Jeff Yuna  :  "@ Scott... don't think you read it all. "Under the revised rule, the compensation paid by a mortgage broker to a loan originator employee or paid by a lender to a loan originator employee does not count towards the points and fees threshold.""
Scott Valins  :  "This is the death sentence for us brokers: The final rule excludes from points and fees compensation paid by a creditor to its loan officers. The Bureau concluded that there were significant operational challenges to calculating individual employee compensation accurately early in the loan origination process, and that those challenges would lead to anomalous results for consumers. In addition, the Bureau concluded that structural differences between the retail and wholesale channels lessened r"
Scott Valins  :  "that's what I read JPM"
John Paul Mulchay  :  "SV, it looks like LPC counts toward the 3%. It still seems muddy..."
Christopher Stevens  :  "From NMLS site... Net Branch Certification: Provide a certification on corporate letterhead, signed by a principal officer or owner, attesting to the applicant’s knowledge and understanding of the Department’s prohibition against net branching. You attention is directed to Section 38.1(u) of the General Regulations of the Banking Board."
Dan Clifton  :  "Michael, net branch issue, I don't know if illegal or not, but I DO KNOW that FHA does not permit and many lenders will not sign up a company that uises true net branch structure. it has to be a wholey owend branch"
Michael Gannon  :  "im pretty sure true net branches where expenses come out of the top and the branch manager makes the profit are illegal in NY but most states are ok. I could be wrong though"
Bryce Schetselaar  :  "This says lender paid to me:which compensation paid by a creditor to a mortgage broker must be included in points and fees, in addition to any origination charges paid by a consumer to a creditor."
Curt Sandfort  :  "Under the revised rule, the compensation paid by a mortgage broker to a loan originator employee or paid by a lender to a loan originator employee does not count towards the points and fees threshold."
Dan Clifton  :  "I think you guys may be reading that excerpt wrong. to me it says if borrower pai it is included in the 3% calc. if Lender paid it is not. The question then is does the "credit" to borrowers offset the points and fees? Plus this issue is also the 3% cap."
Andy Pada  :  "what does go into that 3%? bona fide discount points?"
Andrew Russell  :  "but I think I may be confusing "net branch" and another "official branch", the wording may be the trick, you may be right that net branches arent legal, but actual branches are"
Scott Valins  :  "pretty ridiculous that they aren't considering the fact that closing costs vary widely by state"
Andrew Russell  :  "Pushes down the broker's lender paid fee potentially, which means their ROI and cash flow goes down, which could be the final knock out punch. "
Matt Sullivan  :  "REPRICE: 1:58 PM - Fifth Third Mortgage Better"
Andrew Russell  :  "Dear Mr. Broker, shelf your license and you can become a net branch. Take advantage of not having your fee included in the points and fees threshold, and you also do not have to worry about compliance since we handle that. Please sign here..."
Andrew Russell  :  "and commence the explosion of net branches..."
Bryce Schetselaar  :  "So LO comp no included, Lender paid is"
Bryce Schetselaar  :  "Under the revised rule, the compensation paid by a mortgage broker to a loan originator employee or paid by a lender to a loan originator employee does not count towards the points and fees threshold. This amendment does not change the January 2013 final rule under which compensation paid by a creditor to a mortgage broker must be included in points and fees, in addition to any origination charges paid by a consumer to a creditor."
Bryce Schetselaar  :  "LO comp and lender paid comp not included in the qualified mortgage points and fees. "
Christopher Stevens  :  "REPRICE: 1:51 PM - Wells Fargo Better"
Christopher Stevens  :  "REPRICE: 1:51 PM - Chase Better"
Jason Anker  :  "wells reprice about to hit"
Bryce Schetselaar  :  "The CFPB's finalized ability to repay rule consumerfinance.gov/pressreleases/cfpb-finalizes-amendments-to-ability-to-repay-rule "
Gus Floropoulos  :  "REPRICE: 1:48 PM - PHH Better"
Victor Burek  :  "REPRICE: 1:42 PM - Plaza Better"
Matthew Graham  :  "RTRS- FED'S ROSENGREN SEES US GDP GROWTH AT 2.5 PCT IN FIRST HALF OF 2013, CLOSER TO 3 PCT IN SECOND HALF OF 2013 "
Michael Brasher  :  "REPRICE: 1:32 PM - Caliber Funding Better"
Matthew Carver  :  "REPRICE: 1:28 PM - Sierra Pacific Better"
Matthew Graham  :  "RTRS- ROSENGREN: UNEMPLOYMENT REMAINS QUITE HIGH, INFLATION WELL BELOW TARGET "
Brayden Alexander  :  "Labor improvement not significant. "
Matthew Graham  :  "RTRS- ROSENGREN: ULTIMATE SIZE OF FED'S BALANCE SHEET DEPENDS ON WHEN BOND BUYING ENDS, NOT WHEN TAPERING STARTS "
Matthew Graham  :  "RTRS- FED SHOULD BE WILLING TO REDUCE OR INCREASE BOND-BUYING AS NEEDED -- ROSENGREN "
Brayden Alexander  :  "Modest. "
Matthew Graham  :  "RTRS- ROSENGREN: SIGNIFCANT ACCOMMODATION REMAINS APPROPRIATE AT THIS TIME; BENEFITS OF BOND BUYS OUTWEIGH COSTS "
Matthew Graham  :  "RTRS- FED'S ROSENGREN: 'MODEST' CUT IN FED BOND-BUYING MAY MAKE SENSE AFTER A FEW MORE MONTHS OF IMPROVEMENT ON JOBS, ECONOMY "
Christopher Stevens  :  "REPRICE: 1:20 PM - USBank Better"
Justin Dudek  :  "REPRICE: 1:18 PM - Everett Financial Better"
Matthew Graham  :  "RTRS- US TREASURY - PRIMARY DEALERS TAKE $11.41 BLN OF 5-YEAR NOTES SALE, INDIRECT $15.40 BLN "
Matthew Graham  :  "RTRS- U.S. 5-YEAR NOTES BID-TO-COVER RATIO 2.79, NON-COMP BIDS $34.88 MLN "

Read what our user's have to say about MBS Live on LinkedIn.
» Start a two week free trial of MBS Live.