Learn. Share. Connect. (51,917 Members)  - Join
 

Site Tools

Join Now or Sign In
for Full Access to All Features

Local Professionals
(Change Your Location)

Recent Polls

Should the FTHB Tax Credit be extended?

Created By: Glenn Setzer
  • Yes (75.4%)
  • No (24.6%)

Federal Reserve MBS Purchase Program

MBS OP-ED: MAKING SENSE OF THIS MESS

Posted
 Email Page (New!)   |     Print   |     Bookmark

All expected positives we've promoted aside, which includes the most recent conviction regarding the "it that shall not be named". It is time to put everything in perspective.

Before moving forward we recommend reading the precursors to this post.

First Reading: http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/mortgage_rates/blog/48011.aspx

Second Reading: http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/mortgage_rates/blog/48506.aspx

Third Reading:http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/mortgage_rates/blog/48989.aspx

I must clarify that I am assuming that you have read the precursors to this post...

Knowledge Base...

Yesterday morning the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee (TBAC) released their report on the expected borrowing needs of the US Federal Government.  The report indicated that "There is near consensus that Treasury's funding needs during the next two years will be the largest in the post-war era in dollar terms, and likely also as a percent of GDP". In the their quarterly refunding announcement the Treasury noted that if current predictions are accurate the  "Treasury expects to reach the debt ceiling in the first half of 2009." This implies that "FY09 net borrowing could be as high as18 percent of GDP"

PRESS RELEASE:http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/tg09.htm

Here is the breakdown of the expected borrowing needs...

The Treasury will be "offering $67 billion of Treasury securities to refund approximately $36.3 billion of privately held securities maturing or called on February 15 and to raise approximately $30.7 billion. The securities are:

  • A new 3-year note in the amount of $32 billion, maturing February 15, 2012;
  • A new 10-year note in the amount of $21 billion, maturing February 15, 2019;
  • A new 30-year bond in the amount of $14 billion, maturing February 15, 2039.
  • A new 7-yr note to be issued in Feb 2009.

Plain and Simple: The US Government needs to BORROW a lot more money. Funds they will PAY interest on...

Markets have anticipated this surge of supply by pushing the yield curve steeper and steeper...


This is alarming given the fact that US Government is facing "significant declines" in income. According to the TBAC "Receipts were down by nearly 10% in the first three months of the new fiscal year and the pace of decline appears to have accelerated in January" due to the fact that " trends in unemployment rate where closely correlated with tax receipts and that the general consensus was that unemployment rates would rise from current levels".

Plain and Simple: As job losses mount the US Government is LOSING more and more INCOME.

This is even more distressing given the fact that US Government payment "Outlays were 45 percent higher, reflecting nearly $320 billion in expenditures related to the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) and the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (Senior Preferred Agreement investments and Agency MBS purchases related to Government Sponsored Enterprises) as well as other financial market stabilization efforts."

FYI:  "outlays are surging at a breakneck pace as automatic stabilizers (unemployment compensation, food stamps, etc.) kick in and the government puts in place programs to try and stabilize the financial sector."

Plain and Simple:  FEDERAL INCOME  <  FEDERAL SPENDING. The US Government is SPENDING MORE than they are MAKING and government officials don't anticipate this spending trend to slow in 2009. So the US DEFICIT will continue to GROW.

RECAP SO FAR:    As our economy deteriorates the US government will be forced to continue to stabilize the economy by rapidly expanding their borrowing rate to finance supportive spending. As the US Government increases its borrowing rate and the budget deficit grows, larger interest payments (on the debt they issue) will lead to a larger budget deficit.

How this Relates to Mortgage Industry

In the period between January 22 and January 28, the Federal Reserve completed $16.836bn in MBS transactions.  $7.190bn of that $16.836bn was spent on Fannie Mae MBS.  $4.705bn of that $7.19bn spent on Fannie MBS was used to specifically buy Fannie Mae 5.5s. MBS.

As a mortgage/real estate professional your first response might be..."If the Federal Reserve's goal is to support the mortgage market...Why would the Fed Buy Fannie Mae 5.5 MBS? That doesn't help lower borrowing rates!!!

Your right. Questions like this are logical given the media driven consensus perception of the Federal Reserve's role in stabilizing our economy. In order to properly understand why the Fed would choose to buy 5.5 MBS vs. 4.5 MBS one must remove their mortgage hat and put on their banking hat, but keep your mortgage hat close because you will need it.

Our Answer to your Question: To Offset an Outgoing Cash Flow with an Incoming Cash Flow!!!

Reminders:

  • The US Government needs to BORROW a lot more money. Funds they will PAY interest on...
  • As job losses mount the US Government is LOSING more and more INCOME.
  • FEDERAL INCOME < FEDERAL SPENDING. The US DEFICIT IS GROWING...IF LEFT UNCHECKED THIS WILL NO LONGER BE OUR PROBLEM....IT WILL BE OUR CHILDREN'S CHILDREN'S PROBLEM

A government that runs a budget deficit must sell bonds to pay for their purchases not covered by taxes. That government must pay interest on those bonds. When spending/debt issuance is expected to increase the fundamental implication of this is taxes must be raised to offset the increase in interest expense from borrowing.  Well raising income taxes reduces the incentive to work which lowers potential GDP...and taxes on capital income lowers the quantity of savings and investment which in turn slows the growth rate of real GDP....this doesn't appear to be the most effective strategy for avoiding a government spending induced deflationary spiral. Different strategies must be employed...an out of the box strategy that accomplishes multiple goals.

(FYI crowding out effect is still possible but not while Fed is artificially flattening the yield curve)

What if the Federal Reserve managed to offset the US Government's increasing outgoing interest expense with a stable incoming cash flow...one that exceeds the US Government's cost of borrowing. That would help slow the pace of an increasingly enlarging budget deficit right?

The Federal Reserve could achieve this by manipulating the yield curve in such a way that they created a positive carry trade for themselves. 

How are they doing that? By purchasing Treasuries (bills notes bonds and TIPs), commercial paper, Agency Debt (FN and FRE bonds), MBS, and ABS. By participating in reciprocal currency arrangements, repo agreements, term credit auctions, liquidity facilities, bailouts, swaps and special drawing rights accounts...

Plain and Simple: The Fed is manipulating borrowing costs of all kinds

To break it down in clearer terms...The Fed would need to offset the interest the US Government must pay out (on the Treasury Bills, Notes, and Bonds) with income they receive from a debt security they own.

As a portfolio manager the Federal Reserve would need to search for a fixed income security that matched the timing of their cash flows (receive income in time to pay liabilities), they would also need to ensure maturity of the income stream matched maturity of their liability stream.(There are many other considerations that need to be made, however for the sake of progressing I will not go deeper into fixed income portfolio management)

So what is the average maturity of Treasury Debt?

The TBAC report indicates that the average maturity of the overall marketable debt portfolio "has already fallen from a range of 60 to 70 months which existed from the mid 1980's until 2002 to a level of 48 months more recently."

Furthermore the minutes from the meeting of the TBAC indicate that "Bills currently represent about 33 percent of outstanding marketable debt, and while demand remains robust, Treasury recognizes the need to monitor short-term issuance versus longer dated issuance. As a result, Treasury is balancing the borrowing profile to address these large financing needs (in the short to medium term) while also preserving flexibility to address cyclical or structural shifts."

Plain and Simple: The Treasury Department is trying to extend the time frame that their debt will come due. But the fact that they had to issue so many Bills (to pay for TARP and MBS purchases) they know the process will be slow.

So what debt instruments can the Federal Reserve purchase for their fixed income portfolio to offset the Treasuries debt portfolio?

From the last FOMC statement:

"The Federal Reserve continues to purchase large quantities of agency debt and mortgage-backed securities"

Plain and Simple: The duration of the agency debt (FN/FRE bonds) and mortgage backed securities that the Federal Reserve is purchasing most effectively matches the maturity of the Treasury's debt portfolio.

In the mean time the Federal Reserve is also managing to support the housing market. They are killing two birds with one stone. At the time of these purchases the Fannie Mae 5.5 MBS just happened to provide the best offsetting cash flow for the price they paid...it had the best relative value!

(I know the value of the 5.5s embedded call option is somewhat of an unknown...however as long as the Federal Reserve continues to manipulate interest rates they can control their portfolio's duration)

One may question this "positive carry" strategy citing that if the Fed keeps issuing more supply of debt, yields will continue to rise and TSY funding costs will rise. I respond with this chart of Treasury borrowing costs.

Plain and Simple: The US Government is locking in their borrowing costs at all time lows.

MBS GOING FORWARD....

After the Fed announced its plan to support mortgage markets, the MBS current coupon (MBS trading closest to, but not above, 100-00) went "down in coupon" at a feverish pace until it settled below 4.00%. When the stack compressed (spread between prices of 4.0 MBS and 6.0 MBS tightened) in late December/early January and lenders didn't come through with their end of the deal. The entire stack was trading at a premium (over 100-00) and prepayments were not as wide spread as expected....traders were then left in quite the predicament.

Do they wait to buy more 4.0s and 4.5s? How long will they have to wait? How risky would it be to buy "up in coupon"?

The resulting trade was a little of both which pushed the stack into a stagnant state. While day traders rode the wave of Fed spending  lenders desperately tried to hedge their pipelines amidst multiplying fall out. The MBS current coupon slowly started increasing from its below 4.00% levels. More recently the run up has felt increasingly cumbersome...lenders have been quick to re-price for the worse and slow to pass along gains. Which brings us to present day...

As long as the yield curve stays positively sloped the Federal Reserve will be able to continue trading with positive carry. The Federal Reserve will also maintain its mandate to support the housing market by keeping mortgage rates relatively low.

Here are your roadblocks to a REFI BOOM...

GSE Guarantee Fees: We believe the GSEs have been passing along higher guarantee fees via higher rate sheet mark ups. Plain and Simple they need money.

Originator Operational Capacity: Fall Out has increased lender hedging costs markedly.  Uncertainty about pull through forced lenders to protect themselves. As lender's add operations staff this added cost will diminish. Listen out for more comfortable communications from your investors regarding turn times and the availability of 15 day locks.

Servicing Premiums: Delinquencies increase the cost of servicing a loan. These costs will be passed along to borrowers, we do not expect this additional cost to go away anytime soon.

Unfortunately, due to the previously described constraints on the fixed income market we DO NOT KNOW when "it that shall not be named" will re-ignite. We can however say that we KNOW lenders are preparing themselves for a 4.5% mortgage rate environment. We also know that the MBS market remains at the ready to buy "down in coupon". For now continue to educate your borrowers on what is going on in the mortgage market and for Pete's sake be sure to read the GUT-FLOP to protect your pipeline.

My float boat is out to sea but its sails are currently luffing in the wind....

 

SURVEY: HOW LOW WILL THEY GO??? <--CLICK ME

Data provided by Thomson Reuters
Mortgage Bankers, Secondary Marketing Managers, and Capital Markets Desks, if you are interested in obtaining access to the same fixed income and mortgage market data we use: CLICK HERE.

Comments

Join Now or Login to Post Comments

on
amazing post...hats off to you...
on
That's a ton of info to absorb, but I do beleive you are correct in your thinking. Thanks!
on
wow....give everyone 6 months to read and understand.
on
Definitely a varied and in depth outline. Keep up the good work and I'll be up to speed in no time!!
on
Great post Adam!!!!!
on
I like it. Great explanations... I know I will have to re-read this to absorb it all but the Plain and Simple gives a great overview.
on
Thanks for all the time and effort you guys put into helping us to understand all this mess. I'm understanding more and more each time I read your explanations. Thanks!!!
on
Fantastic info. You all do an excellent job!
on
Adam, You are way too smart! Great post!
on
thank you very much Adam...this will clear up a lot of question that we have all had about what is going on!!!! GREAT POST
on
Much appreciated Adam! Keep up the great work---saving that post to my MBS folder.
on
AQ - wonderful job balancing real pith with layfolk "translation" - this is the kind of writing that will appeal universally to the broad (and broadening) MBS blog audience. This is the type of post I can show all motivated mbs newbies in the office without fear of it being hopelessly above OR condescendingly beneath them. I'm tipping my cap to you; this is a very tough thing to do. Nice work.
on
I wish my Text Books in College had a "Plain & Simple" section after every paragraph! This was Excellent!! Thank you very much!
on
Incredible! Thank you!
on
So what does MBS stand for again? Just kidding! Great post.
on
Adam, Great post bro! Anyone reading and comprehending at a 6th grade level will get his. Keep up the great work.
on
Aah what a tangled web they weave. Great post the best I have seen so far. Please keep up the fine work and the abbreviated summations.
on
Tremendous Value! A game as large as the one we are playing in always explains itself with many variables. Adam, get a publisher! thanks!
on
unbelievable... you da man.
on
Good Work, very readable So the Fed locks in long term rates at 60 to 70 months expected maturity then floats debt at 60 to 70 days and makes the spread. All the while trying to extend the debt float duration to lock in rates for the long term. The bet is that the economy recovers and the revenues rise so the stimulus that is slated to kick in 2010-2013 does not have as heavy a debt requirement and % of debt to GDP does not go off the chart. Better tell the DEMS that new entitlements are not Keynesian temporary defict spending or this will get real ugly. Ref: Bill Gross February outlook at PIMCO.com
on
Masterful. Thank you for sharing your knowledge.
on
Your comments and analysis seem dead on. I've been trying to make sense of all these technical factors from previous posts and this one summed it up so I could understand. I appreciate the "plain & simple" summaries, as they make it easier for us Mortgage Advisors to explain to clients the ying & yang of the MBS market and why rates haven't dropped further.
on
Just received this from one of my wholesalers. Sounds like a scare tactic to get us to lock and clear the pipeline. Doesn't this contradict what what you wrote? Or am I looking at it wrong? Your thoughts?? "Waiting for 4.5%?? Important insight to originators from XXX: If you have borrowers who are waiting around for the much-touted 4.5% mortgage that the media is slobbering all over, you need to get them locked and closed now. Look at what is being purchased by the Fed - - mostly 5.0%’s and 5.5%’s. To-date, their actions represent about 15% of their targeted purchases, which by now represents enough to get a read on whether it will work. And have rates come down dramatically since they started? No. In fact, they’ve gone the other way (read today’s post on the Freddie Mac survey). Just because the media heard 4.5% as a target doesn’t mean it will necessarily happen anytime soon. Also you have to look at the larger view. As mentioned below, the Treasury’s refunding efforts (redeeming bonds with proceeds received from issuing lower-cost debt obligations with ranking equal to or superior to the debt to be redeemed) are now at record levels and will continue – the Obama $900B spending plan will only add to that. This staggering amount of debt supply will need higher yields to attract buyers. The yield curve is steepening already to accommodate supply, and will continue to do so. Higher Treasury yields will put downward pressure on MBS prices, and mortgage rates will climb. Some analysts now think that as the 10-year moves above 3% the Fed will have to step in and buy long-term Treasury debt. Government agencies buying debt from other government agencies; sound a bit like Madoff? Any way you look slice it, the weather vane is pointing to higher rates, not lower ones. If your borrower can be bettered now, better to act now."
on
Wow Adam what a great post - you should ask for a raise.
on
Great post. Thank you so much.
on
Still trying to digest all of that, but thank you for the insightful post. This site is a great resource in helping to understand everything that is going on and the potential implications we'll face in the future.
on
Damonpmr, either a scare tactic or a skewed view. The author's reasoning for rates going up is the same reasoning adam covered as being an understandable part of them eventually going down. 1/5th of the way through the process is no where near enough to know if "it's going to work." Rising treasury yields mean nothing considering current historically wide spread levels. The fact that the author would not account for this, one of the most glaring and basic facts of MBS analysis these days, is irresponsible at best. Then, no mention of primary/secondary spreads... tsk tsk... I would recommend use as toilet paper, but you're likely to catch something that way. Best stick to charmin'.
on
Outstanding work. Reads very well as you are balancing your techno-speak with originator level commentary. Look forward to the data on the refundings this evening!
on
Excellent Job!!!! That was one of the best; if not the best explaination of our current market. Adam Keep up the great work.
on
Who ever thought Macro-Economics would be so cool (so speakth a gray-haired MBA student)?! Soooo, if "IT" happens, then what? (perhaps I missed a post?). Everything seeks a balance, there is no free lunch. If the Fed and every homeowner locked in a low rate, doesn't that push inflation toward deflation? Or how about capital flight like has occured in many, small countries? Or.... what? (I'm still very much a student here.) And then once that happens, then how does the MBS community react?