Learn. Share. Connect. (51,917 Members)  - Join
 

Site Tools

Join Now or Sign In
for Full Access to All Features

Local Professionals
(Change Your Location)

Recent Polls

Should the FTHB Tax Credit be extended?

Created By: Glenn Setzer
  • Yes (75.4%)
  • No (24.6%)

Federal Reserve MBS Purchase Program

Speeds and Spreads

Posted
 Email Page (New!)   |     Print   |     Bookmark

This was an archived piece that I had published to the wrong section that I don't think ever made it on the blog.  It may be useful as a knowledge base.  Let me know if you think it needs more:

 

Speeds and Spreads....

 

Though it is very important to understand that MBS and treasuries are very different, there are important  ways to analyze them together.  To put it simply, Treasuries are the risk free benchmark against which numerous other fixed-income investments are compared.  It's as simple as that.  For the most part, treasuries are considered to be utterly risk free, whereas MBS, like other fixed-income investments have "risk."  Of the greatest importance to MBS investors is NOT "credit risk," which is the risk they will not be paid back, but rather it is "call risk."  In other words, there is a risk that the loans underlying MBS pools can be "called" when the homeowner sells, refinances, or undergoes another form of less savory disposition.  In all cases, the investor's standpoint is the same (that's not to say that Fannie, Freddie, the servicer, and the MI company won't take a hit, but the investor is guaranteed "timely payment of principle and interest").

Because MBS have risk and treasuries don't, that which is risk free can be used as a baseline to determine just how risky anything else is.  The "Risk Premium," then, is simply the difference in yield between the risk-free and the non-risk-free.  This is the VERY central concept of MBS analysis known as "spread."  In fact, MBS analysts are more concerned with the difference in yield between MBS and treasuries than they are with the actual yields themselves.  Since there are many types of treasuries and many types of MBS, how then do we go about comparing the two in the most pertinent manner?

Say we want to start our analysis with MBS versus a 10 year treasury.  In order to get a relevant basis for comparison from the  MBS side, we have to find an MBS coupon that "lasts about as long" as 10 years.  Remember that there is no set time limit on MBS other than the mortgage note.  If people want to keep them all 30 years, they can.  But of course, they don't.  The question of "prepayment speed" is central to the concept of MBS analysis.  This is commonly referred to as "speeds."  It encompasses refinances, sales, foreclosures, etc...  For mortgage brokers in particular, it's important not to confuse anything about a "prepayment penalty" with "prepayment speeds" (though penalties are gradually becoming a thing of the past it seems).  So if you hear us discuss "prepays," or "speeds" or CPR (constand prepayment rate), or "weighted avergage life," or "embedded call option" (since the borrower can 'call' the note by paying it off), we are concerned with how long the average borrower in a mortgage that underlies an MBS coupon will keep paying their mortgage.  One thing that might surprise some of you is that in the instance of foreclosure etc..., the secondary market investor is much less worried that the loan is defaulting because they are guaranteed "timely payment of principle and interest" and much more worried that the speeds they were anticipating are changing, so they might have cash that was locked in earning 7% all of the sudden in a market that's only paying 4.5%.  Lots of money gets lost that way.  Lots of banks go out of business.  And we see exactly what we've seen, which is mortgage spreads blowing out far past all time wides to account for the uncertainty in prepayment speeds. To conclude, we used a baseline of 10 year treasuries agains the 4.5% coupon because the prepayment speed on a 4.5 is roughly 10 years.  So to an investor choosing risk versus no risk, everything else would be apples to apples.  When the yields (rates) on mortgages go down faster than treasury yields, that's what we refer to as "tightening" (because the yield curves are getting tighter to each other).

Data provided by Thomson Reuters
Mortgage Bankers, Secondary Marketing Managers, and Capital Markets Desks, if you are interested in obtaining access to the same fixed income and mortgage market data we use: CLICK HERE.

Comments

Join Now or Login to Post Comments

on
I appologize in advance if my questions are elementary, but I am new to this site...I am however very impressed with the content. why are the investors guaranteed "timely payment of principle and interest?" If the borrower doesn't pay, then how are the investors getting paid? When you say spreads blowing out to all time highs, does that mean that because of new risk in MBS they are returning a higher yield (therefore a cheaper price) compared to TSY's than normal? Sending mtg rates higher than they would be if the new speed concerns weren't there... Above you referred to "tightening," when that happens, do more investors buy TSY's because they can get a similar return for less risk...therefore hurting MBS's further because they are competing for investor dollars? Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks.
on
it's seems crazy the FED has pumped 69 Bil into MBS without much price improvement. it also seems that our best prices were when the fed wasn't even involved back on Dec 17th 2008. if the fed has pumped 69 bil without any improvement does that mean they are one of the few bidders on MBS right now?
on
Place your picks, who thinks tomorrow we have improvement to pricing? I vote yes; 2 bunk days in a row we gotta be due for at least a slight rebound!~ Here's to manana!!~
on
The money line on price improvements is +320 right now.
on
There are a few reports coming out tomorrow, here is hoping they are bond / MBS friendly!
on
Bobby, the Fed was involved on that day. I believe that was the day after the Fed cut rates to 0 to 25 bps. What a nightmare! That morning I had 4.625% with 1.10% rebate in my hand and no one wanted to lock. By 1PM reprice for the worse had 4.625% at 0.7% cost. I haven't recovered since.
on
Jake, Investors are guaranteed money because that is the guarantee that Fannie and Freddie make to their investors. No doubt part of a strategy to help entice investors so that we have a secondary market for mortgages.
on
Hey Adam or Matt. Quick question. If the overall disposition because such that lower rates seem inevitable, will the 4.5 coupon still be the benchmark against the 10 year treasury?