Learn. Share. Connect. (60,904 Members)  - Join
 

Site Tools

Join Now or Sign In
for Full Access to All Features

Contributors

JOE GARRETT
Partner
Joe Garrett has 30 years in the mortgage banking industry, half of which was as CEO & President of FDIC insured banks. He has...

CORKY WATTS
Partner
Corky Watts has over 35 years in the mortgage banking industry with senior management positions in capital markets, production and operations. He has....

MIKE MCAULEY
Director
Mike had been at JP Morgan Chase's mortgage warehouse lending division, where he managed business development, technology and operations.  Prior to this...
 

Mortgage Portmanteaus -- Brankers and Broanchers vs. Net Branches

Posted
 Email Page   |     Print   |     Bookmark   |   Tweet This - New!

A portmanteau means a blend of two or more words and their meanings into one new word.  An example is the word brunch meaning breakfast +lunch.  Another is smog meaning a combination of smoke and fog.  Some would consider a portmanteau a type of word morphing and we agree.  Mortgage lending has had its share of portmanteaus.  

Over the last several years mortgage brokers who were transitioning to mortgage banking were sometimes phrased as Brankers.  Branker is a morph of a mortgage banker and mortgage broker.  A Branker acts and operates as a mortgage broker and doesn’t perform many functions of a mortgage banker – underwriting, doc prep and secondary market --, but does fund and sell loans in their name as a mortgage bankers. 

One key similarity with Bankers and Brankers is loan repurchase and regulatory risk.  A Branker funding a loan in its name has essentially the same liability as a banker.  As the mortgage meltdown evolved, capital requirements increased and a warehouse liquidity shortages occurred, Branking died a quick death.    

A new mortgage lending portmanteau has evolved.  It’s been here before, but we can’t call it what it really is because HUD doesn’t like the name.  I’m calling it Broanching.  Broanchers are mortgage brokers who latch onto a mortgage banker and are responsible for the P&L of the branch.  All revenues generated from origination activities are credited to the Broacher’s branch; and all expenses specific to operating the branch are the responsiblilty of the Broancher.  Sometimes the “mother ship” might assess a monthly administrative fee, fee for brokering out to another wholesaler or even credit the Broancher if a high percentage of loans are funded through mortgage bank.  

It is amazing how fast this is taking off.  Many wholesalers believe their business may shrink because the overall share of TPO business is expected to shrink below 15%.  Out of fear, many have developed a retail channel strategy of recruiting their mortgage broker customers to become Broanchers.   These lenders are recruiting existing TPO customers and bringing them in as a branches.  Some allow the mortgage broker to use their existing name as a DBA and some want them to take on the corporate name.  The bottom line it is net branching – “it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it must be duck.”  

Many mortgage brokers are flocking to mortgage bankers to become Broanchers.  Out of fear, many believe the new regulations and headline news may make it difficult to operate as an independent mortgage broker.  Some believe HVCC and the new RESPA regulation have made it difficult for mortgage brokers to compete with large retail mortgage banks.
ju
This week, one of my broker buddies with 10 loan officers and a $10 million monthly pipeline was courted by 4 regional mortgage bankers,  two of which were TPO shops only three months ago.  My friend is a seasoned professional and asked each banker the following questions:

  • What is your net worth and what were your profits last year?
  • What is your monthly volume and how much warehouse capacity to you have?
  • Who are your secondary market investors?
  • What type of technology supports the branches and the bank?
  • Are you selling loans through mandatory or best efforts delivery commitments?

My friend is convinced he needs to make this move, but is asking all the right questions to ensure he attaches his operation onto the right company.

This channel is growing as a strategy for both originator and banker in response to the many regulatory changes and potential drop in volume this year.  I’m not sure Broancher is the right portmanteau to label the old name of net branching that we can’t use today.  If you have another name we might use, let’s hear about it.

 

Comments

on
We are looking at the same things here.
on
Regional, National, Chartered lenders all want one thing and one thing only. The holdback of the SRP that they get to make each departments P & L more profitable at your expense. The more volume you bring with the least amount of defaults the happier they are. With additions of layers to underwriting you will definetely see a decrease in approved loans. Wholesale is not going anywhere.
on
"Profit at your expense" is a bit jaded. I think you are referring to the margin the operation bakes into rate sheets to cover reserve funds, pay for processors, underwriters, closers, shippers, office supplies, phone bills, copier leases, and yes earn a living on their business. Don't forget...these shops still have to be competitive to get business. I disagree with you on the underwriting process too...having an underwriter in the office to answer questions and provide guidance is invaluable. That of course assumes your UW had an open door policy. It seems like you had a very bad experience with a net branch that was not set up with an originator's needs in mind.
on
Adam, With all due respect, you are making several assumptions that are unjust. I have worked for both local and national lenders. Your "baked into rate sheets" are almost ultimately passed on to the originator and/or borrower. There have been several exaples this year where HUD came in and shut down those operations. The broker does not need to "bake in" anything because their overheads are a small fraction of waht lenders spend. I don't know if you are an originator but as per the items that you mention above like "processors, underwriters, closers, shippers...", all those are paid through the HUD-1 by the borrower. No need to double charge.
on
I am not making any assumptions, I am simply adding my professional perspective to the short sighted point of view you've provided. My perspective is derived from loan level experiences as a secondary marketing, production, and operations manager. A broker is unable to bake anything into their rate sheet because they have to show their rebate on the HUD but that doesn't mean there isnt margin built into broker pricing. The bank you are selling that loan to has to cover their costs just like a direct lender. A wholesale rate sheet has margin baked into it too! I do agree that loan fees SHOULD cover fixed expenses..it just never seems to work out that way though...the environment is too darn competitive. Things like last minute GFE matching, credit re-pulls, multiple AUS runs, LOS licensing, LO insurance costs on LO's who do no produce, 401k contributions, reserve building, unexpected repurchase requests, flat bank fees, etc etc etc are all additional costs that never seem to be totally "fixed" but still must be paid. The operation must offset these costs and still find a way to make a living (profit). The more efficient the operation, the less the COSTS OF DOING BUSINESS are passed along to the consumer. But don't get it twisted, every rate sheet has margin baked in. My point: I agree that wholesale isnt going anywhere, I do not agree with the "profit at your expense" statement. Don't forget what the core business of any mortgage lender is: TO EARN A LIVING FROM LENDING. I promise you, mortgage banker managers HAVE TO keep their LOs competitive or they will not keep their processors and underwriters busy...
on
Adam, I am in complete agreement with you. I have actually worked as a direct lender and the success of my branch P&L was directly tied to my ability to deliver good spreads with my secondary department. I actually think these are very difficult times. Specially when the margins NEED to be competitive. Personally, I could not afford to pay for my LO's current licensing requirements, LO's that don't produce, etc. These are, however, manageable variables. Management sometimes has to make tough choices and I personally do not believe that it should be absorbed by any mortgage business. Yes, you run the risk of losing staff, but it is also and opportunity to rethink your overhead and get leaner.The current barrier of entry into our business is harder than its ever been.