Register or Sign in        Email This Page     Link To This Page    
Visit MND at MBA in NYC!
72,887
# of Subscribers

You do not have permission to post in these forums.  Join Now or Sign In to post.

Page 1 of 1 (15 items)
Post Statistics: 9,536 Views, 14 Replies
Latest Post: Tue, Jul 21 2009 11:45 AM by Matthew Chase
  • Mon, Jan 5 2009 8:34 AM
    Home Valuation Code of Conduct - May 1, 2009 - Yikes!!

    Please post your thougts on the following....

    New Appraisal Guideline as of May 1, 2009

     

    On Tuesday, December 23, 2008, Freddie Mac (FHLMC) published the revised Home Valuation Code of Conduct (the "Code").  The effective date for any Lenders selling loans to FHLMC to comply with the new "Code" is May 1, 2009.  The FHLMC rules follow very closely what Fannie Mae is going to implement on May 1, 2009.

     

    Bottom line, the lender will have to start ordering the appraisals for all Broker loans, unless there is legislative or legal changes to this fine rule issued by the Federal Reserve.

    Freddie Mac Revised Code

     The "Code" came about as a result of  an agreement made between Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae (now being referred to as the Federal Housing Finance Agency) and the New York State Attorney General.  The intent of the  agreement was made to enhance the independence of appraisers.  Over the past months, both Agencies have received comments from Sellers and other Industry participants.  Those comments have been reviewed and incorporated into the revision. 

    For those loans originated on or after May 1, 2009; lenders are requried to represent and warrant that appraisals for single-family loans, other than government-insured loans (FHA) conform to the "Code".  Freddie Mac will not purchase any single family mortgage loan (other than government insured loans "FHA") from any mortgage lenders who do not agree to adopt to the "Code".  In January, Freddie will provide additional details on how to implement the "Code".

    If you only have time (or patience) to read a portion of this message, please go to Section III and read that portion in it's entirety.  Section III is very important.

    Keep in mind, this is Freddie Mac's announcement;  I am certain that Fannie Mae will release their requirements shortly and they will mirror Freddie's.  What does this mean for you?  Get to know the "Code" and get ready for change. 

    Now is the time to keep in touch, be active and express your concerns to your Industry Associations (your State Associations such as CAMB and CMB; your National Associations NAMB and MBA).  Most of all, assist them in their efforts by donating time and money to the respective Government Affairs Committees.

    Below you will find a reprint of the "Code".  The statements you see in blue italics are my own opinions and are not to be interpreted as those of any Industry Association or Freddie Mac.  As always, I urge you to go to the above link and read the information in full and form your own opinion and if necessary, obtain legal advice. 

     

    HOME VALUATION CODE OF CONDUCT

    I. Appraiser Independence Safeguards
     
    A.  An "appraiser" must be, at a minimum, licensed or certified by the state in which the property to be appraised is located.


    B.  No employee, director, officer, or agent of the lender, or any other third party acting as joint venture partner, independent contractor, appraisal company, appraisal management company, or partner on behalf of the lender, shall influence or attempt to influence the development, reporting, result, or review of an appraisal through coercion, extortion, collusion, compensation, inducement, intimidation, bribery, or in any other manner including but not limited to:
        (1)    withholding or threatening to withhold timely payment or partial payment for an appraisal report;
        (2)    withholding or threatening to withhold future business for an appraiser, or demoting or terminating or threatening to demote or terminate an appraiser;
        (3)    expressly or implied promising future business, promotions, or increased compensation for an appraiser;
        (4)    conditioning the ordering of an appraisal report or the payment of an appraisal fee or salary or bonus on the opinion, conclusion, or valuation to be reached, or on a preliminary value estimate requested from an appraiser;
    (no more contacting the appraiser and saying "if you can hit this number, you can have the appraisal.)
        (5)    requesting that an appraiser provide an estimated, predetermined, or desired valuation in an appraisal report prior to the completion of the appraisal report, or requesting that an appraiser provide estimated values or comparable sales at any time prior to the appraiser's completion of an appraisal report; (when the appraisal is ordered, no longer will you be able to provide the appraiser with an anticipated appraised value.  Actually, you shouldn't have been doing that in the first place, but that's a different story.)
        (6)    providing to an appraiser an anticipated, estimated, encouraged, or desired value for a subject property or a proposed or target amount to be loaned to the borrower, except that a copy of the sales contract for purchase transactions may be provided;
        (7)    providing to an appraiser, appraisal company, appraisal management company, or any entity or person related to the appraiser, appraisal company, or appraisal management company, stock or other financial or non-financial benefits; 
    (It's pretty obvious that you cannot offer the appraiser a financial  incentive, but this paragraph states any entity or person related to the appraiser.  That could be a very broad group and should definitely be noted.)
        (8)    allowing the removal of an appraiser from a list of qualified appraisers, or the addition of an appraiser to an exclusionary list of disapproved appraisers, used by any entity, without prompt written notice to such appraiser, which notice shall include written evidence of the appraiser's illegal conduct, a violation of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) or state licensing standards, substandard performance, improper or unprofessional behavior or other substantive reason for removal (except that this prohibition will not preclude the management of appraiser lists for bona fide administrative reasons based on written, management-approved policies); (removing an appraiser from your approved list cannot be done without just cause; so do your due diligence before adding the appraiser to your approved list.) 
        (9)    ordering, obtaining, using, or paying for a second or subsequent appraisal or automated valuation model (AVM) in connection with a mortgage financing transaction unless: (You cannot order another appraisal because the first did not meet the value you needed.  Shown below are the two exceptions allowed.)
              (i) there is a reasonable basis to believe that the initial appraisal was     flawed or tainted and such basis is clearly and appropriately noted in the loan file,              

     

    OR      
             (ii) unless such appraisal or automated valuation model is done pursuant to written, pre-established bona fide pre-funding or post-funding appraisal review or quality control process or underwriting guidelines, and so long as the lender adheres to a policy of selecting the most reliable appraisal, rather than the appraisal that states the highest value; or
       (10)   any other act or practice that impairs or attempts to impair an appraiser's independence, objectivity, or impartiality or violates law or regulation, including, but not limited to, the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and Regulation Z, or the USPAP.

     


    C.  Nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting the lender (or any third party acting on behalf of the lender) from requesting that an appraiser

            (i) provide additional information or explanation about the basis for a valuation,

    OR

           (ii) correct objective factual errors in an appraisal report.

    (Good news, you can still get the appraiser to provide further explanations or correct factual errors.)

    II. Borrower Receipt of Appraisal


    The lender shall ensure that the borrower is provided a copy of any appraisal report concerning the borrower's subject property promptly upon completion at no additional cost to the borrower, and in any event no less than three days prior to the closing of the loan. The borrower may waive this three-day requirement. The lender may require the borrower to reimburse the lender for the cost of the appraisal.
    (This is interesting - you will be required to provide to the borrower a copy of the appraisal at least three (3) business days prior to loan closing. Some States already require you to provide the appraisal within a specified time and even on a Federal level you are required to provide the appraisal within ten days if requested.  But now you have no option, it will become a standard practice.  The good news is that the Borrower can opt out of the three (3) day requirement so that closing can proceed. You cannot charge the Borrower for the copy, but you can charge them for the cost of the appraisal.)

     

    III. Appraiser Engagement

    (If you only read a portion of this Announcement - Make sue you read and understand this section !!)

    A. The lender or any third party specifically authorized by the lender (including, but not limited to, appraisal companies, appraisal management companies, and correspondent lenders) shall be responsible for selecting, retaining, and providing for payment of all compensation to the appraiser. (This is an important paragraph - "WHO" can order the appraisal.) The lender will not accept any appraisal report completed by an appraiser selected, retained, or compensated in any manner by any other third party (including mortgage brokers and real estate agents). (This is pretty specific -  the lender will be prohibited from accepting an appraisal that was ordered by a third party - most importantly - MORTGAGE BROKER or REAL ESTATE AGENT!) The lender may accept an appraisal prepared by an appraiser for a different lender, including where a mortgage broker has facilitated the mortgage application (but not ordered the appraisal), provided the lender:

     

        (1) obtains written assurances that such other lender follows this Code of Conduct in connection with the loan being originated;

     and

         (2) determines that such appraisal conforms to its requirements for appraisals and is otherwise acceptable.

     B. All members of the lender's loan production staff, as well as any person (Here's the kicker for the Correspondent Lender - no one who is part of the production staff will be able to order or communicate with the appraiser. This includes loan processors.  This could also include Underwriters if they report to any loan production staff.)  

         (i) who is compensated on a commission basis upon the successful completion of a loan

     or

        (ii) who reports, ultimately, to any officer of the lender not independent of the loan production staff and process, shall be forbidden from:

     

                (1) selecting, retaining, recommending, or influencing the selection of any appraiser for a particular appraisal assignment or for inclusion on a list or panel of appraisers approved to perform appraisals for the lender or forbidden from performing such work;

                 and

                 (2) having any substantive communications with an appraiser or appraisal management company relating to or having an impact on valuation, including ordering or managing an appraisal assignment. If absolute lines of independence cannot be achieved as a result of the lender's small size and limited staff, the lender must be able to clearly demonstrate that it has prudent safeguards to isolate its collateral evaluation process from influence or interference from its loan production process.

     

     

    C. Any employee of the lender (or if the lender retains an appraisal company or appraisal management company, any employee of that company) tasked with selecting appraisers for an approved panel or substantive appraisal review must be

     

        (1) appropriately trained and qualified in the area of real estate appraisals,

    and

        (2) in the case of an employee of the lender, wholly independent of the loan production staff and process.
    (The way I am reading this, the Lender will have to have a department that is trained in the art of appraisals and must be outside the perview of loan production.  Does anyone else see another fee that will be charged to the Borrower? The overhead charge of the Lender will be going up.)

     

     

     

    IV. Prevention of Improper Influences on Appraisers

     

    A. In underwriting a loan, the lender shall not utilize any appraisal report:
        (1) prepared by an appraiser employed by:
             (a) the lender;
             (b) an affiliate of the lender;
             (c) an entity that is owned, in whole or in part, by the lender; or
               (d) an entity that owns, in whole or in part, the lender. 
        (2) prepared by an appraiser
               (a) employed, 
             (b) engaged as an independent contractor, or
             (c) otherwise retained by any appraisal company or any appraisal management company affiliated with, or that owns or is owned, in whole or in part by, the lender or an affiliate of the lender. 

    (Gone are the days of a Lender having an appraisal company as a subsidiary or an affiliate unless specific controls and firewalls are in place, read further for the exceptions.)
     
    B. Section IV.A. shall apply unless:
       (1) the appraiser or, if an affiliate, the company for which the appraiser works, reports to a function of the lender independent of sales or loan production; 
    (Here's another independent department that answers to someone other than Production.)
       (2) employees in the sales or loan production functions of the lender have no involvement in the operations of the appraisal functions and play no role in selecting, retaining, recommending, or influencing the selection of any appraiser for any particular appraisal assignment or for inclusion on a list or panel of appraisers approved to perform appraisals for the lender or forbidden from performing such work;
       (3) employees in the sales or loan production functions of the lender are not allowed to have any substantive communications with an appraiser, appraisal company, or appraisal management company relating to or having an impact on valuation or to be provided information about which appraiser has been given a particular appraisal assignment before completion of that assignment;
    (I like the "substantive communications" statement, at least the Appraisal Department won't be in total isolation.)
       (4) the lender, or its agents, and any appraisal company or appraisal management company providing the appraisal to the lender do not provide the appraiser any estimated or target value of the property or the loan amount applied for (except that a copy of the sales contract for purchase transactions may be provided);
       (5) the appraiser's compensation does not depend in any way on the value arrived at in any appraisal or upon the closing of the loan for which the appraisal was completed;
       (6) the lender and any appraisal company or any appraisal management company providing the appraisal to the lender has adopted written policies and procedures implementing this Code of Conduct, including, but not limited to, adequate training and disciplinary rules on appraiser independence (including the principles detailed in Part I of this Code of Conduct) and has mechanisms in place to report and discipline anyone who violates these policies and procedures;
      (7) the lender's appraisal functions are either annually audited by an external auditor or are subject to federal or state regulatory examination, and, unless prohibited by law, the lender promptly provides to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac the results of any adverse, negative, or irregular findings of such audits and examinations indicating non-compliance with any provision of this Code of Conduct, whether or not the examination was conducted for the purpose of determining compliance with this Code of Conduct; and
    (Additional Quality Control requirements will be put into place; along with reporting responsibilities.)
      (8) the lender and any entity described in section IV.A. providing the appraisal to the lender recognize that, once the Independent Valuation Protection Institute is established, (a new Regulatory Entity is being established) the Institute will receive complaints for review and referral regarding non-compliance with the Code of Conduct. Referrals and reports shall be made to Fannie Mae and/or Freddie Mac regarding such complaints and the Institute will provide information on the results of complaint reviews to Fannie Mae and/or Freddie Mac and make them available to the other parties to the Home Value Protection Program and Cooperation Agreement. 
     

     

     

    C. In underwriting a loan, the lender shall not use an appraisal report prepared by an entity that is affiliated with, or that owns or is owned, in whole or in part by, another entity that is engaged by the lender to provide other settlement services, as that term is defined in the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, 12 U.S.C.§ 2601 et seq., for the same transaction, unless the entity that provides the appraisal:
        (1) has adopted written policies and procedures implementing this Code of Conduct, including, but not limited to, adequate training and disciplinary rules on appraiser independence (including the principles detailed in this Code of Conduct) and has mechanisms in place to report and discipline anyone who violates these policies and procedures;
        (2) recognizes that, once the Independent Valuation Protection Institute is established, the Institute will receive complaints for review and referral regarding non-compliance with the Code of Conduct. Referrals and reports shall be made to Fannie Mae and/or Freddie Mac regarding such complaints and the Institute will provide information on the results of its review of such complaints to Fannie Mae and/or Freddie Mac and make them available to the other parties to the Home Value Protection Program and Cooperation Agreement.


    D. Notwithstanding the requirements herein, the lender also may use in-house staff appraisers to
    (Here's how a Lender can maintain Staff Appraisers.)

            (i) order appraisals,

            (ii) conduct appraisal reviews or other quality control, whether pre-funding or post-funding,

            (iii) develop, deploy, or use internal automated valuation models, or

            (iv) prepare appraisals in connection with transactions other than mortgage origination transactions (e.g. loan workouts), if it complies with the terms of this Code of Conduct.


    E. The provisions of this section do not apply to institutions (including non-banking institutions) that meet the definition of a "small bank" as set forth in 12 U.S.C. § 2908, and which Freddie Mae or Fannie Mae determines would suffer hardship due to the provisions, and which otherwise adhere to this Code of Conduct.

     

    V. The Independent Valuation Protection Institute

     

    An Independent Valuation Protection Institute (Institute) shall be created as approved by the parties. Subject to section IX, when the Institute is established, the lender will provide information to appraisers and borrowers regarding the availability of the Institute's services, which are expected to include:

     

       (1) a telephone hotline and email address to receive any complaints of Code of Conduct non-compliance, including complaints from appraisers, individuals, or other entities concerning the improper influencing or attempted improper influencing of appraisers or the appraisal process, which the Institute will review and report as provided in IV.B(8) and IV.C(2) of this Code of Conduct;

     

    and

     

        (2) the publication and promotion of best practices for independent valuation. The lender shall not retaliate, in any manner or method, against the person or entity that makes a complaint to the Institute.

     

    (Look for another Disclosure to be required.  Whatever happened to the "Reduction in Paperwork Act"?)

     

    VI. Appraisal Quality Control Testing

     

    The lender agrees that it shall quality control test, by use of retroactive or additional appraisal reports or other appropriate method, a randomly selected 10 percent (or other bona fide statistically significant percentage) of the appraisals or valuations that are used by the lender, including the results of automated valuation models, broker's price opinions, or "desktop" evaluations. (Make sure you take note of  the appraisals that are to be part of the QC review - they include BPO's and AVM's) The lender shall provide to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac a report of any adverse, negative, or irregular findings of such quality control testing, and any findings indicating non-compliance with any provision of this Code of Conduct, with respect to loans sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac respectively, and the Enterprise may enforce all applicable rights and remedies, including requiring the lender to repurchase mortgages or the Enterprise's participation interest in mortgages. (This could prove to be a very scary paragraph depending on whether or not any remedies are allowed  to correct any findings determined in the QC review.)


    VII. Referrals of Appraisal Misconduct Reports

     

    Any lender that has a reasonable basis to believe an appraiser or appraisal management company is violating applicable laws, or is otherwise engaging in unethical conduct, shall promptly refer the matter to the applicable State appraiser certifying and licensing agency or other relevant regulatory bodies.


    VIII. Representations and Warranties


    A lender shall certify, warrant, and represent that the appraisal report was obtained in a manner in compliance with this Code of Conduct. If the Enterprise determines, on its own or from a referral made by the Institute, that a lender is in breach of a material aspect of this Code of Conduct or in violation of a provision of the Code by a complaint referred from the Institute, the Enterprise will enforce all applicable rights and remedies, including suspension or termination of the lender's eligibility to sell loans to the Enterprise, if the lender fails to remediate.


    IX. Scope of Code

     

    Nothing in this Code of Conduct shall be construed to establish new requirements or obligations that:

        (1) require a lender to obtain a property valuation, or to use any particular method for property valuation (such as an appraisal or automated valuation model) in connection with any mortgage loan or mortgage financing transaction;   

        (2) affect the acceptable scope of work for an appraiser in connection with a particular assignment;

    or

        (3) require the lender or any third party acting on behalf of the lender to take any action prohibited by federal or state law or regulation.

     - View My Profile
    Owner/President
    Parlay Mortgage & Property, Inc.
    jzimmer@parlaymortgage.com
    (815) 838-6613
  • Tue, Jan 6 2009 5:35 PM

    Wells Fargo rolled out a program to be compliant with these new apprasial expectations and we have 2 other investors who are putting together options as well.

    I think this makes appraisers work in a socialist environment where the job you do and the relationships you create have no value.

    Not good for our industry. Not good.

     - View My Profile
    Senior Loan Officer
    SkiHawk Mortgage Team
    clem@skihawk.net
    (719) 266-8183 x23
  • Wed, Jan 7 2009 8:38 AM

    Clem Borkowski:
    Not good for our industry. Not good.

     

    I agree.  It is also not beneficial for the home owners.  Notice that a lender can accept an appraisal that was done for another lender if they receive "written" assurances that the other lender complies with all of these requirements.  <sarcasm> It should be pretty easy to get the written assurances when taking a loan to another lender. <sarcasm>

     - View My Profile
    Mortgage Consultant
    M & M Mortgage, LLC #213677
    kmikkola@themmmortgage.com
    (651) 558-9807
  • Wed, Jan 7 2009 2:07 PM

    How is it even possible for us to get the current lender to release the appraisal to another lender?  Why would they do that?  So if the loan falls out at one lender, but another lender can do it, then borrower get's charged for another appraisal?  This does not make any sense.  How is this protecting the consumer?   

     - View My Profile
    Owner/CEO
    Priority Capital Funding
    chris@prioritycf.com
    (925) 272-0367
  • Sun, May 3 2009 10:57 PM

    What, huh, where?  (You know you'll just come to like me!)

     - View My Profile
    Broker
    Finance One Mortgage
    financeone@juno.com
    (530) 644-5395
  • Mon, May 4 2009 10:30 AM

    SoCal,

    I posted that 5 months ago.

     - View My Profile
    Owner/President
    Parlay Mortgage & Property, Inc.
    jzimmer@parlaymortgage.com
    (815) 838-6613
  • Mon, May 4 2009 6:40 PM

    Jason Zimmer:
    SoCal,

     

    I posted that 5 months ago.

    But was your original post edited and if so, what was edited and by whom?  If edited, did you approve?

     - View My Profile
    Broker
    Finance One Mortgage
    financeone@juno.com
    (530) 644-5395
  • Mon, May 4 2009 9:32 PM

    How was his post edited?  It looks to me that he posted his original thread in January, got some action but than went into hibernation.  Than Trace woke it up in May, probably by looking through old posts.

    I could be wrong, just ask Bob, he will tell ya.

     

     

     - View My Profile
    Mortgage Planner
    Ross Wright Mortgage Group
    vburek@866whyross.com
  • Tue, May 5 2009 1:13 AM

    Catherine Coy:

    As the industry implements HVCC, we'll probably find lenders capitulating on this provision.  Lenders can--and probably should--release the appraisal to a new lender at the request of the consumer PROVIDED THAT the fall out wasn't due to LTV.

    In the meantime, it's far more important that influence be eradicated from appraisals, even if it means that a consumer occasionally pays twice for an appraisal.  If that happens, I recommend that the loan officer/realtor(s) pick up the tab for the second appraisal.  There's no RESPA violation in doing so, ya know.

    Grow some!  Sheesh.  :-)

    Wow!  No one left to argue with Catherine?  You sure have a lot of free time on your hands to dig up posts from months ago.  First off, are you secretly dating Andrew Cuomo?  Maybe a better question would be "Are you Andrew Cuomo?"  I will inform my clients up front that they may have to pay for multiple appraisals if the transaction does not go through.  This will ensure they have some accountablitly and a personal stake in the transaction.  After all, this is a two way street.  This is why they call it "working together".  Say it with me now Catherine..."W-O-R-K-I-N-G T-O-G-E-T-H-E-R!"  It is clear to me now that you need to work on your sales skills.  Are you familiar with the statement "Never negotiate your own deal!"?.  Maybe you shouldn't be so scared to tell your clients that it may cost them more money to get their loan done if the loan falls out at lender A and you need to submit to lender B.  There is no RESPA violation in doing so, ya know!  Grow some!  Sheesh!

    P.S.  I don't have email alerts turned on because I'm too busy closing loans for my clients.  it takes up most of my day.  It may actually take me some time to read your next enlightening response.  25 bps says you will have the uncontrolable urge to respond to have the last word.  Tag your it!   

     - View My Profile
    Owner/CEO
    Priority Capital Funding
    chris@prioritycf.com
    (925) 272-0367
  • Tue, Jul 21 2009 11:45 AM

    It doesn't seem to say that consumers cannot be told anything by the appraisers. I just encountered this.

    I am no longer in the industry - I am now an attorney but was a NY mortgage broker for years some time ago. I can see where every aspect of this destroys business relationships (as someone posted above) and exacerbates an already terrible real estate market. Resales will plummet, prices will plummet, and everyone will blame evil capitalists rather than the real villains - Fannie, Freddie, lawmakers and the small percentage of bad or corrupt appraisers.

    Today I called the appraiser on three rental properties I'm in the process of re-financing (in Missouri), to see what the holdup was. He was kind enough to inform me that the bank would have the appraisals today, but no, he couldn't by law tell me what the values were, since the lender ordered the appraisals.

    Why? It's a done deal. Why not simply give me the number? What is the conflict?

    Stupid, know-nothing bureaucrats enforcing laws written by equally stupid politicians who have ZERO experience in the business world.

    This will all end badly...

Page 1 of 1 (15 items)
X
Track Mortgage Rates Daily with our Free Daily Rate Updates. There are several ways to follow daily rate movements, including:
Email Address:   Zip Code:  
RSS - Subscribe to our Daily Rate Update RSS Feed.
Twitter - Follow our Daily Rate Update on Twitter.
Facebook - Follow our Daily Rate Update on Facebook.
Bookmark - Bookmark our rates page and visit daily for updates.
Mobile Apps - There's an App for this too. Learn more about our Mobile Apps.