Register or Sign in        Email This Page     Link To This Page    
Visit MND at MBA in NYC!
33,875
# of User Comments

You do not have permission to post in these forums.  Join Now or Sign In to post.

Page 1 of 5 (88 items) 1 2 3 4 5 Next >
Post Statistics: 7,648 Views, 87 Replies
Latest Post: Sun, May 3 2009 11:28 PM by Catherine Coy
  • Fri, Apr 17 2009 10:59 AM
    URGENT - NAMB Call to ACTION - HVCC

    April 16, 2009

     

    Dear NAMB Member:

     

    This is a Call to Action! Please contact your Senators and Representatives TODAY and urge them to STOP or DELAY (for at least 12 months) the implementation of the Home Valuation Code of Conduct (“HVCC”) which is de facto regulation, forced on Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae by New York Attorney General Cuomo.

     

    Below is a list of key talking points to bring to the attention of your legislators. Please contact your legislators today at their in-district offices, as Congress is currently in recess. You can access the contact information for your legislator here. We encourage you to keep trying to contact them if you are not initially successful. It is vital to the overall effectiveness of this call.  Please forward this email to your mortgage broker and appraiser contacts.

    ____________________________________________________________________________________________

     

    Talking Points:

                     

    Its impact on Consumers:

    A.                 The HVCC negatively affects consumers by increasing the costs to consumers for an appraisal, reducing consumer choice and adversely impacting a consumer’s ability to obtain a reliable and quality appraisal.

    B.                 The HVCC creates a heightened risk for consumers by requiring the use of unregulated Appraisal Management Companies (AMCs) for appraisals. The original investigation that prompted the HVCC’s creation was of an AMC and Washington Mutual Bank alleging that they engaged in practices of pressuring appraisers on behalf of Washington Mutual.

    C.                 It increases the time to fund loans for consumers which necessitates longer rate locks or extensions of existing locks thereby increasing costs to consumers. In the case that a new lender or broker is chosen, a new appraisal will be necessitated, increasing the time to fund.

    D.                 It restricts the portability of an appraisal since each lender, in effect, will require a new appraisal.

    Its impact on Small Business:

    E.                  The HVCC squeezes out small business professionals that are striving to survive and have been working with consumers in the very neighborhoods where they are looking to purchase homes.

    F.                  The HVCC affects small business appraisers, mortgage brokers, Realtors and lenders in all 50 states without having been reviewed by ANY state or federal legislature or agency.

    G.                 Small business professionals who have in-depth knowledge of local market conditions are being sacrificed for large AMCs who operate on a national scale to distribute orders through a primary processing hub or hubs which can be located up to thousands of miles away from the property being appraised.

    Its failure to comply with procedural law:

    H.                 Although the HVCC is broad regulation having a significant impact on small businesses and consumers, it did not go through the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”), the Regulatory Flexibility Act or other procedural laws as required by any regulation issued by a federal agency.

    I.                    FHFA claims that as Conservator of the GSEs, its actions are not “agency actions” under the APA and that its actions are “expressly precluded from judicial review” as a result of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act.

    Appraisal standards exist:

    J.                   The Federal Reserve issued appraisal independence standards through Regulation Z being implemented this October which applies to every industry participant.

    K.                The banking regulators issued interagency guidance on appraisal standards which are expected to become final by September 2009.

     

     

    Background:

     

    1)      The HVCC negatively affects consumers and the already fragile economy.

          As it stands today, the HVCC will take effect on May 1, 2009, and this rule states that GSEs will no longer purchase loans from lenders “accepting appraisal reports completed by an appraiser selected, retained, or compensated in any manner by any third party.” It overwhelmingly impacts small lending institutions and independent appraisers to the  detriment of consumers.

    a)      Consumers will have to pay more for their appraisals to have them completed by AMCs.

    b)      The exclusive use of AMCs limits competition in the marketplace, leaving the consumer and independent appraisers at a disadvantage.

    c)      The AMC model is flawed and will produce poor quality work that will create a continuation of the declining housing market.

     

    2)      The manner in which lenders will collect fees in compliance with the HVCC is a potential violation of RESPA.

    a)       Lenders may be in direct violation of section 8(b) of RESPA due to possible up-charging and fee-splitting. Every lender will be at risk of HUD action on every brokered loan they underwrite.

    b)      Lenders will not utilize brokers for fear of potential RESPA violations. In addition, those lenders who only do brokered loans will go out of business all together, and competition within the marketplace will cease to exist. Again, at the detriment of consumers.

     

    3)      There already exists pervasive federal regulation of the mortgage lending industry's acquisition of real estate appraisals. 

    a)      FIRREA - In 1989, following the savings and loan crisis, Congress passed the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act ("FIRREA"), which established a multi-faceted real estate appraisal regulatory system involving the federal government, the states, and The Appraisal Foundation.  Since 1989, the federal agencies responsible for regulating financial institutions have promulgated regulations under FIRREA that set forth "generally acceptable appraisal standards," and have issued guidance relating to real estate appraisals, which, among other things, set forth standards for selecting qualified appraisers.  These regulations and appraisal guidelines both prohibit improper influence on appraisers and work to ensure appraisal independence.

    b)      FRB Final Rule - In July 2008, the Federal Reserve Board ("Board") issued a final rule prohibiting all mortgage brokers, mortgage lenders and their affiliates "from coercing, influencing, or otherwise encouraging appraisers to misstate or misrepresent the value of a consumer's principal dwelling."  In issuing this final rule, the Board concluded that "[no] particular procedure for ordering an appraisal necessarily promotes" fraudulent appraisals.  Rather, the Board determined that the "coercion of appraisers," whether by lenders or mortgage brokers, "is an unfair practice" and the final rule should apply to lenders and mortgage brokers alike.  NAMB fully supported the Board's final rule because it targets problematic practices, rather than business relationships that present no inherent problems.

    c)      FFIEC Interagency Guidance – On November 19, 2008, the FFIEC regulatory agencies issued proposed revisions to the “Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines,” and requests for comment.  The FFIEC regulatory agencies are currently reviewing the submitted comments and plan to issue a final rule this year.

    d)      H.R. 1728 – “The Mortgage and Anti-Predatory Lending Act of 2009” was introduced on March 26, 2009.  TITLE VI of the bill —APPRAISAL ACTIVITIES — deals with every facet of the appraisal process that will ensure true appraisal independence and protect consumers.

     

    4)      The HVCC fails to comply with the Administrative Procedures Act.

          The HVCC is a substantive rule that created de facto regulation of the entire mortgage industry in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA").

    a)      The FHFA is an agency and the HVCC falls within the definition of a rule under the APA.  As such, the FHFA was required to utilize notice and comment rulemaking proceedings under the APA, but the agency failed to do so. 

    b)      Because this rule regulates the entire mortgage industry and the FHFA failed to follow proper rulemaking procedures, we believe the HVCC is void, invalid, and unenforceable.

     

  • Rate this Post:
    Mon, Apr 20 2009 1:57 AM

    Is there any evidence somewhere to back up talking points A thru K or are we supposed to just blindly state NAMB's opinion as fact and look like idiots if it's untrue?

  • Wed, Apr 22 2009 2:37 PM

     

    Call to Action!

     

    Dear Mortgage Professional:

     

    There has been significant bipartisan movement forward by Congress on the Home Valuation Code of Conduct (“HVCC”) as a result of the phone calls made to your legislators’ in-district offices last week!  Key Republican and Democrat Congressmen have shown their support for our cause, and we need to keep the momentum going.  We can not stop now!

     

    Call to Action! Please contact your Representatives TODAY, and urge them to or delay the implementation of the final rule promulgated by the FHFA, which implements the controversial HVCC.

     

    Congress has returned from recess; please contact your legislators’ at their Washington, DC offices. We ask, however,  that you DO NOT contact Congressman Barney Frank’s office on this issue at this time.  You can access the contact information for your legislator here.  We encourage you to make every effort to try again if you are not initially successful in contacting them. It is vital to the overall effectiveness of this call.

     

    Also, please forward this Call to Action to everyone you do business with!  By encouraging other mortgage professionals to make calls, legislators will better understand the HVCC’s negative impact on the entire mortgage market.

     

     

    Talking Points:

                     

    Its impact on Consumers:

    A.                 The HVCC negatively affects consumers by increasing the costs to consumers for an appraisal, reducing consumer choice and adversely impacting a consumer’s ability to obtain a reliable and quality appraisal.

    B.                 The HVCC creates a heightened risk for consumers by requiring the use of unregulated Appraisal Management Companies (AMCs) for appraisals. The original investigation that prompted the HVCC’s creation was of an AMC and WAMU alleging that they engaged in practices of pressuring appraisers on behalf of WAMU.

    C.                 It increases the time to fund loans for consumers which necessitates longer rate locks or extensions of existing locks thereby increasing costs to consumers. In the case that a new lender or broker is chosen, a new appraisal will be necessitated, increasing the time to fund.

    D.                 It restricts the portability of an appraisal since each lender, in effect, will require a new appraisal.

    Its impact on Small Business:

    E.                  The HVCC squeezes out small business professionals that are striving to survive and have been working with consumers in the very neighborhoods where they are looking to purchase homes.

    F.                  The HVCC affects small business appraisers, mortgage brokers, Realtors and lenders in all 50 states without having been reviewed by ANY state or federal legislature or agency.

    G.                 Small business professionals who have indepth knowledge of local market conditions are being sacrificed for large AMCs who operate on a national scale to distribute orders through a primary processing hub or hubs which can be located up to thousands of miles away from the property being appraised.

     Its failure to comply with procedural law:

    H.                 Although the HVCC is broad regulation having a significant impact on small businesses and consumers, it did not go through the Administrative Procedures Act, the Regulatory Flexibility Act or other procedural laws as required by any regulation issued by a federal agency.

    I.          FHFA claims that as Conservator of the GSEs, its actions are not “agency actions” under the APA and that its actions are “expressly precluded from judicial review” as a result of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act.

    Appraisal standards exist:

    I.                    The Federal Reserve issued appraisal independence standards through Regulation Z being implemented this October which applies to every industry participant.

    J.                   The banking regulators issued interagency guidance on appraisal standards which are expected to become final this year.

     

     

    Background:

     

    1)      The HVCC negatively affects consumers and the already fragile economy.

    As it stands today, the HVCC will take effect on May 1, 2009, and this rule states that GSEs will no longer purchase loans from lenders “accepting appraisal reports completed by an appraiser selected, retained, or compensated in any manner by any third party.” It overwhelmingly impacts small lending institutions and independent appraisers to the detriment of consumers.

    a)      Consumers will have to pay more for their appraisals to have them completed by AMCs.

    b)      The exclusive use of AMCs limits competition in the marketplace, leaving the consumer and independent appraisers at a disadvantage.

    c)      The AMC model is flawed and will produce poor quality work that will create a continuation of the declining housing market.

     

    2)      The manner in which lenders will collect fees in compliance with the HVCC is a potential violation of RESPA.

    a)       Lenders may be in direct violation of section 8(b) of RESPA due to possible up-charging and fee-splitting. Every lender will be at risk of HUD action on every brokered loan they underwrite.

    b)      Lenders will not utilize brokers for fear of potential RESPA violations. In addition, those lenders who only do brokered loans will go out of business all together, and competition within the marketplace will cease to exist. Again, at the detriment of consumers.

     

    3)      There already exists pervasive federal regulation of the mortgage lending industry's acquisition of real estate appraisals. 

    a)      FIRREA - In 1989, following the savings and loan crisis, Congress passed the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act ("FIRREA"), which established a multi-faceted real estate appraisal regulatory system involving the federal government, the states, and The Appraisal Foundation.  Since 1989, the federal agencies responsible for regulating financial institutions have promulgated regulations under FIRREA that set forth "generally acceptable appraisal standards," and have issued guidance relating to real estate appraisals, which, among other things, set forth standards for selecting qualified appraisers.  These regulations and appraisal guidelines both prohibit improper influence on appraisers and work to ensure appraisal independence.

    b)      FRB Final Rule - In July 2008, the Federal Reserve Board ("Board") issued a final rule prohibiting all mortgage brokers, mortgage lenders and their affiliates "from coercing, influencing, or otherwise encouraging appraisers to misstate or misrepresent the value of a consumer's principal dwelling."  In issuing this final rule, the Board concluded that "[no] particular procedure for ordering an appraisal necessarily promotes" fraudulent appraisals.  Rather, the Board determined that the "coercion of appraisers," whether by lenders or mortgage brokers, "is an unfair practice" and the final rule should apply to lenders and mortgage brokers alike.  NAMB fully supported the Board's final rule because it targets problematic practices, rather than business relationships that present no inherent problems.

    c)      FFIEC Interagency Guidance – On November 19, 2008, the FFIEC regulatory agencies issued proposed revisions to the “Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines,” and requests for comment.  The FFIEC regulatory agencies are currently reviewing the submitted comments and plan to issue a final rule this year.

    d)      H.R. 1728 – “The Mortgage and Anti-Predatory Lending Act of 2009” was introduced on March 26, 2009.  TITLE VI of the bill  APPRAISAL ACTIVITIES — deals with every facet of the appraisal process that will ensure true appraisal independence and protect consumers.

     

    4)      The HVCC fails to comply with the Administrative Procedures Act.

    The HVCC is a substantive rule that created de facto regulation of the entire mortgage industry in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA").

    a)      The FHFA is an agency and the HVCC falls within the definition of a rule under the APA.  As such, the FHFA was required to utilize notice and comment rulemaking proceedings under the APA, but the agency failed to do so. 

    b)      Because this rule regulates the entire mortgage industry and the FHFA failed to follow proper rulemaking procedures, we believe the HVCC is void, invalid, and unenforceable.

     

    If you are not yet a member, we urge you to act now and join today to ensure that you don’t miss out on being kept aware and involved with critical issues like this.  Simply click here to do so:  MEMBERSHIP.

     

    We CANNOT continue to spearhead these issues and advocate on your behalf without your support, so PLEASE join or renew today to ensure that our association remains able to do so.

    THANK YOU!

     

    Brought to you by the MMA - The only professional trade association specifically dedicated to serving the specialized needs of mortgage brokers throughout the Commonwealth and the leader in providing significant business services and educational opportunities to mortgage industry professionals throughout New England. The MMA strives to keep you informed about the ever-changing legislative and regulatory arena and provide you with vital industry information that could affect your business.

    "Advancing higher standards for mortgage professionals; creating better results for consumers."

    Denise M. Leonard, Executive Director,

    92 High Street, Suite T-41C

    Medford, MA  02155

    Phone:  (781) 393-9400; Fax:  (781) 33-9500

    dleonard@massmort.org

     


     


    Powered by MemberClicks 
  • Thu, Apr 23 2009 11:21 AM

    I have no problem with low values from a competent appraiser.  I do have problems with incompetent appraisers.  

  • Thu, Apr 23 2009 12:43 PM

    Bryan Bledsoe:
    I have no problem with low values from a competent appraiser.  I do have problems with incompetent appraisers

     

    There are also a lot of competent appraiser who do incompetent work.  Most of the AMCs are using both types, since they are the one's willing to perform (jump thru their hoops) for 1/2 the standard rate on average wit.  It is possible within a few months or so, low appraisals will be a thing of the past, but that doesn't mean they will be reliable or accurate.

       

  • Rate this Post:
    Thu, Apr 23 2009 5:35 PM

    I agree that Realtors are the initial and overlooked link in the chain of inflated values. All pressure begins with them.

    But it ends at the lenders and that is who is now in control. HVCC wrongly assumes that the lenders are going to be the white hats and not inflate values just to make a buck and that is completely wrong. Of course, it can be wrong when you are in the back pocket of congress with bribes and kickbacks.

    HVCC is not a good solution at all, but the current NAMB argument against it is unproven opinion and instead should be what I've just stated above. Lenders acting against the interests of the consumer is already a proven fact that should be emphasized and the public needs to know that this will also increase their costs dramatically.

    NAMB has done nothing except try to get money from members. Overall, the incompetence of NAMB in representation before congress is astounding and the mafia strongarm tactics Stephen mentioned above are horrifying to hear about. A new broker union is needed. I've been debating renewal since finding out our state's 'broker' representatives all seemed to be Countrywide employees. This just keeps icing the cake.

  • Thu, Apr 23 2009 6:17 PM

    I know I am going to get flamed for this but how about we do nothing.  The gov't is overcorrecting the problem IMO.  Have we really seen inflated appraisals recently?  I know I sure haven't.  The gov't is doing too much too late.  The dust has settled, we all know that mistakes were made the last few years and we have learned from them.  Overcorrecting isn't going to help the situation.

    Does no one else find it beyond crazy that the whole whing that started this(WaMu pressuring an AMC) is now suppose to be the solution? 

  • Thu, Apr 23 2009 6:33 PM

    I tend to agree with you on that.......I beleive that with the regulation that is in place right now and with underwriters running their own AVM or reviews will catch the majority of inflated prices......this appears to be just one more over lay of the loan approval or processing.....of which I from experience have had many conditions on my appraisals ordered from a AMC.....and they take their time in getting the conditions that are needed to the underwriter......can we all live with this....YES...do I want to live with it....NO. They need to find a better way to manage the ordering of these appraisals other than what is to come......I do not have the best way and this is a process that will take some time to iron out all the BIG issues....so I beleive that if they would at least delay this for another 12 months so that we as mortgage originators can get under control the changes that are already out there and are to come.With so many lenders managing their pipeline and controling it with pricing we will more than likely have to order more than 1 appraisal on each property if the lender we originally send the file to does not transfer the appraisal. One thing will help is if lenders stop controling their rates being published based on how busy they are....if it was an even palying field will help. This will help us close the loan whewre we originaly place the file and ordered the appraisal. But since lenders have so much control I do not see this happening either......I do agree that there should be some control and I do believe this was done already by underwriters who ran reviews.......

  • Thu, Apr 23 2009 6:42 PM

    SLE,

    I have to very much agree with you.  It's interesting that no one has really mentioned that fact yet.  It's also interesting to note that any "undue" influence on the part of an individual loan officer, realtor, homeowner, etc. is much less systemic or pernicious than that wielded by a lender (like WAMU) over an AMC (like eAppraiseIT).   

     - View My Profile
    Senior Mortgage Banker
    Juan Boldizsar -- Pan American Mortgage, LLC -- a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pan American Bank
  • Thu, Apr 23 2009 6:56 PM

    Juan Boldizsar:
    It's interesting that no one has really mentioned that fact yet.

     

    I pointed that out on another thread along with the the NAR's call to action to delay the implementation of the code for 1 year to May 2010.

     

    SoCalGal - My comment about - competent appraisers doing incompetent work - is saying because of the AMCs requirements for appraisers, competent appraisers are not doing the necessary research and analysis to provide a creditable report thereby equal to the incompetent appraiser's quality of work and results.

  • Thu, Apr 23 2009 9:41 PM

     

    Insider Viewpoints by Roy DeLoach, Chief Executive Officer, NAMB Roy DeLoach, Chief Executive Officer, NAMB
    NAMB Testifies in Congress on new Mortgage Reform Bill

    Today NAMB Government Affairs Committee Chairman, Denise Leonard, will testify before the House Financial Services Committee at a hearing entitled, “H.R. 1728, the Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act of 2009”. NAMB will be joined by various other industry trade representatives to discuss their support and/or opposition to provisions included in this legislation. H.R. 1728 attempts to address concerns over abusive lending practices without transferring undue risk to mortgage originators, creditors, and securitizers. H.R. 1728 is divided into six Titles, which include residential mortgage loan origination standards, high-cost mortgages, and appraisal activities. NAMB is committed to working with members of Congress and is confident that the provisions contained in the bill will ultimately protect mortgage brokers' right to be compensated while at the same time protecting consumers. The hearing is scheduled for 10:00am EST.

    To watch the hearing live, please click here.
    For a copy of the proposed legislation, please click here.

    NAMB’s testimony will be available on the Legislative Action Center later this afternoon.

  • Thu, Apr 23 2009 9:43 PM

    Just new here and glad I came across this site recently vs the others. There are very knowledgable people posting here with great opinions on this issue.  My questions is has anyone contacted your representatives with these great reasons to why the HVCC is not the solution?  I am in agreement with many of these posts and have emailed my representatives with my concerns.  Anyone know if Cuomo has some type of prior connection to the AMC's.

Page 1 of 5 (88 items) 1 2 3 4 5 Next >
X
Track Mortgage Rates Daily with our Free Daily Rate Updates. There are several ways to follow daily rate movements, including:
Email Address:   Zip Code:  
RSS - Subscribe to our Daily Rate Update RSS Feed.
Twitter - Follow our Daily Rate Update on Twitter.
Facebook - Follow our Daily Rate Update on Facebook.
Bookmark - Bookmark our rates page and visit daily for updates.
Mobile Apps - There's an App for this too. Learn more about our Mobile Apps.