<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Fannie Mae Fails To File Quarterly Report - Again</title><link>http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/8152005_Fannie_Mae_Earnings.asp</link><description>Fannie Mae continues to struggle with its massive accounting reinstatement and the New York Stock Exchange is getting restless.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP2 (Build: 31106.96)</generator><item><title>RE:Fannie Mae Fails To File Quarterly Report - Again</title><link>http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/8152005_Fannie_Mae_Earnings.asp#11073</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2bb7a989-b681-446d-a7f2-bd5f0562f228:11073</guid><dc:creator>sohonyc</dc:creator><description>The problem is that regardless of special treatment or not, Fannie Mae is a terrifyingly big business with real financial obligations that have implications for the security of the economy of the United States.  At this point its *very* clear that there is something very wrong up at Fannie Mae (they haven&amp;#39;t reported since 2004).  This isn&amp;#39;t just about &amp;quot;special treatment&amp;quot;  this is a &amp;quot;cover up&amp;quot; plain and simple.  Continuing this charade is patently dangerous.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11073" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE:Fannie Mae Fails To File Quarterly Report - Again</title><link>http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/8152005_Fannie_Mae_Earnings.asp#11072</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2bb7a989-b681-446d-a7f2-bd5f0562f228:11072</guid><dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator><description>Why should fannie get special treatment?  If they are too important to delist, why even have the requirement for an audit in the first place?  Its because they are so large that they need special scrutiny.  Perhaps they figure its better for their short term incentives to release nothing rather than something that looks bad.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11072" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>