<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Watters v. Wachoiva - Supreme Court Sides With Feds In Bank Preemption Case</title><link>http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/4202007_Watters_Wachovia.asp</link><description>The right of the federal banking oversight system to preempt any attempts by the various states' to regulate federally chartered financial systems has been discussed several times in these pages over the last month. That discussion centered on a nationwide</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP2 (Build: 31106.96)</generator><item><title>RE:Watters v. Wachoiva - Supreme Court Sides With Feds In Bank Preemption Case</title><link>http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/4202007_Watters_Wachovia.asp#10647</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2bb7a989-b681-446d-a7f2-bd5f0562f228:10647</guid><dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator><description>I think this 4-5 dis. on the nation highest court in this land really stinks. I want my wachovia account not in 20 years I mean 5-3 from Debbie (President Bush).&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10647" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE:Watters v. Wachoiva - Supreme Court Sides With Feds In Bank Preemption Case</title><link>http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/4202007_Watters_Wachovia.asp#10650</link><pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2bb7a989-b681-446d-a7f2-bd5f0562f228:10650</guid><dc:creator>Mom</dc:creator><description>The American Nightmare! Just ask me.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10650" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE:Watters v. Wachoiva - Supreme Court Sides With Feds In Bank Preemption Case</title><link>http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/4202007_Watters_Wachovia.asp#10649</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2bb7a989-b681-446d-a7f2-bd5f0562f228:10649</guid><dc:creator>cjh</dc:creator><description>It would be nice if the state and federal banking regulatory agencies had jurisdiction in all cases of mortgage fraud, but in the case of Ameriquest, Argent, ACC, AMC, Mortgage It, and Deutsche Bank, they have a very comfortable &amp;quot;gray&amp;quot; area. Deutsche Bank put up the front money, the others organized under their wing.When Deutsche Banks CEO stepped down in 2003 to become American ambasador to Netherlands, you kinda got the feeling he had ESP for prosecution.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10649" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE:Watters v. Wachoiva - Supreme Court Sides With Feds In Bank Preemption Case</title><link>http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/4202007_Watters_Wachovia.asp#10648</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2bb7a989-b681-446d-a7f2-bd5f0562f228:10648</guid><dc:creator>kennedy</dc:creator><description>If one were to read the recent case of Kennedy Scott v. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, it appears the eighth circuit denies the existence of such national banking systems, by declaring that the Federal Reserve banking system is not an agent or instrumentality of the federal government.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10648" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>