This email was sent to you by: James |
|
Mortgage News Daily
|
Message: YOUR MESSAGE HERE |
Email alerts, such as this one, are a
free service provided by Mortgage News Daily. If you would like to receive an alert when
important news breaks please
register to join our community.
Another City Looks at Eminent Domain as Solution to Foreclosures
Another city hard hit by the housing
crisis has proposed exercising its power of eminent domain on behalf of its
underwater homeowners. The City Council
of Brockton, Massachusetts voted this week to commission a study into the
feasibility of such a move, joining several municipalities in California and the
City of Chicago which have already taken a look at such an undertaking.
Brockton, an old industrial city located
south of Boston, has seen the median price of its housing drop from $260,000 to
around $120,000 since the first quarter of 2007 and home sales during the same
period drop by about a third. The
proposed plan is designed to stabilize the housing market, curtail blight, and
return homeowners to a positive equity situation. If adopted, the City would use eminent domain
to take foreclosed properties (REO) from lenders and sell them to city
residents and non-profit organizations. Under
the plan the City could also seize underwater mortgages from the investors who hold
them, restructuring them to reflect the value of the underlying collateral then
reselling them to other investors at that new value.
In the middle of this plan is a new firm established for the sole purpose of
facilitating the mortgage purchases. Mortgage
Resolution Partners was founded last summer by Phil Angelides, formerly the
chairman of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission which investigated and
issued a lengthy report on the causes of the U.S. housing market collapse and a
former California state treasurer. According
to Reuters, Angelides is seeking financial backers for his company, telling
potential investors his plans to buy mortgages at a deep discount could
generate a 20 percent annual return.
Reuters offered this quote from a letter the company sent to prospective
investors. "We just might do a good
thing for America, and along the way get a great return on investment. If our hopes do not pan out, the amount
wagered should be a deductible loss."
When the plan first emerged in San Bernardino County California it got a lot
of push back. Objections have increased
over time. Almost immediately twenty
trade organizations led by SIFMA the lobbing group representing the securities
industry protested the proposals and made it clear they would litigate any
eminent domain action. Representative
John Campbell (R-CA) introduced a bill titled The Defending American Taxpayers from Abusive Government Takings Act
which would prohibit the four major government sponsored mortgage providers from
buying loans in any community and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) as
conservator for GSEs also joined in and conducted a period of public comment on
the subject. All of these opponents
argue that the idea of using eminent domain, especially to seize loans, would
constitute an unconstitutional seizure and an unwarranted abridgement of
investors' property rights and that lenders would effectively boycott any
community that adopted such a plan.
More from MND:
If you would like to opt-out of receiving email forwards from this person please click here to remove your email address.
This email was sent to you by:
|
Mortgage News Daily
|
|
James Authentic Hermes Bags Handbags bsjuehynb Bowboro Village
Oakmere
Harrisonert Park
CA 123456 |
123456 |
Message:
YOUR MESSAGE HERE
Another City Looks at Eminent Domain as Solution to Foreclosures
Another city hard hit by the housing
crisis has proposed exercising its power of eminent domain on behalf of its
underwater homeowners. The City Council
of Brockton, Massachusetts voted this week to commission a study into the
feasibility of such a move, joining several municipalities in California and the
City of Chicago which have already taken a look at such an undertaking.
Brockton, an old industrial city located
south of Boston, has seen the median price of its housing drop from $260,000 to
around $120,000 since the first quarter of 2007 and home sales during the same
period drop by about a third. The
proposed plan is designed to stabilize the housing market, curtail blight, and
return homeowners to a positive equity situation. If adopted, the City would use eminent domain
to take foreclosed properties (REO) from lenders and sell them to city
residents and non-profit organizations. Under
the plan the City could also seize underwater mortgages from the investors who hold
them, restructuring them to reflect the value of the underlying collateral then
reselling them to other investors at that new value.
In the middle of this plan is a new firm established for the sole purpose of
facilitating the mortgage purchases. Mortgage
Resolution Partners was founded last summer by Phil Angelides, formerly the
chairman of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission which investigated and
issued a lengthy report on the causes of the U.S. housing market collapse and a
former California state treasurer. According
to Reuters, Angelides is seeking financial backers for his company, telling
potential investors his plans to buy mortgages at a deep discount could
generate a 20 percent annual return.
Reuters offered this quote from a letter the company sent to prospective
investors. "We just might do a good
thing for America, and along the way get a great return on investment. If our hopes do not pan out, the amount
wagered should be a deductible loss."
When the plan first emerged in San Bernardino County California it got a lot
of push back. Objections have increased
over time. Almost immediately twenty
trade organizations led by SIFMA the lobbing group representing the securities
industry protested the proposals and made it clear they would litigate any
eminent domain action. Representative
John Campbell (R-CA) introduced a bill titled The Defending American Taxpayers from Abusive Government Takings Act
which would prohibit the four major government sponsored mortgage providers from
buying loans in any community and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) as
conservator for GSEs also joined in and conducted a period of public comment on
the subject. All of these opponents
argue that the idea of using eminent domain, especially to seize loans, would
constitute an unconstitutional seizure and an unwarranted abridgement of
investors' property rights and that lenders would effectively boycott any
community that adopted such a plan.
If you would like to opt-out of receiving email forwards from this person please click here to remove your email address.