This email was sent to you by: James |
|
Mortgage News Daily
|
Message: YOUR MESSAGE HERE |
Email alerts, such as this one, are a
free service provided by Mortgage News Daily. If you would like to receive an alert when
important news breaks please
register to join our community.
Nevada Supreme Court Upholds Two Trial Court Decisions in Favor of MERS
Three-Justice Panel, Citing Prior-Court Opinion Affirms MERS' Authority as Beneficiary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Jason Lobo Phone: 703.652.1660 Email: jasonl@mersinc.org Reston, Virginia, December 21, 2012 - MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. today announced that two recent opinions written by Nevada Supreme Court Justice Nancy M. Saitta affirmed trial court decisions holding that Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) is a valid beneficiary of deeds of trust in the state. Justices James W. Hardesty and Kristina Pickering also joined in each opinion. In Ashley v. MERS et al. , the three-justice panel relied on the Court's decision in Edelstein v. Bank of New York Mellon to affirm judgment in favor of MERS and two other defendants. In
More from MND:
If you would like to opt-out of receiving email forwards from this person please click here to remove your email address.
This email was sent to you by:
|
Mortgage News Daily
|
|
James Authentic Hermes Bags Handbags bsjuehynb Bowboro Village
Oakmere
Harrisonert Park
CA 123456 |
123456 |
Message:
YOUR MESSAGE HERE
Nevada Supreme Court Upholds Two Trial Court Decisions in Favor of MERS
Three-Justice Panel, Citing Prior-Court Opinion Affirms MERS' Authority as Beneficiary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Jason Lobo Phone: 703.652.1660 Email: jasonl@mersinc.org Reston, Virginia, December 21, 2012 - MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. today announced that two recent opinions written by Nevada Supreme Court Justice Nancy M. Saitta affirmed trial court decisions holding that Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) is a valid beneficiary of deeds of trust in the state. Justices James W. Hardesty and Kristina Pickering also joined in each opinion. In Ashley v. MERS et al. , the three-justice panel relied on the Court's decision in Edelstein v. Bank of New York Mellon to affirm judgment in favor of MERS and two other defendants. In
If you would like to opt-out of receiving email forwards from this person please click here to remove your email address.