This email was sent to you by:
Anonymous |
|
Mortgage News Daily
|
Message: YOUR MESSAGE HERE |
Email alerts, such as this one, are a
free service provided by Mortgage News Daily. If you would like to receive an alert when
important news breaks please
register to join our community.
Fed Governor Says Housing and Banking Industry Owes America
Federal
Reserve Governor Sarah Bloom Raskin called out housing finance players in a
speech on Friday, reminding them of the "low road" they traveled
before the housing collapse and the debt they owe the American people for rescuing
them from their excesses. She also told
her audience that reforming the servicing industry is "the key to economic
recovery."
Speaking
to the Midwinter Housing Finance Conference in Park City Utah, Raskin said that
in an economic sense the recession is over, but "Americans still looking
for work, living in cars or motels, or trying to keep their businesses out of
bankruptcy would beg to disagree."
The lethargic pace of recovery has many causes but, in her view, the big
drag is the state of the housing sector.
Usually it is the first to recover because of low interest rates and
pent-up demand and is followed by consumer expenditures which magnifies and
multiples the effect of the housing recovery.
Today recovery is hampered both by losses in income and net worth and
by persistent unemployment. With the
pipeline full of distressed properties we might even see further downward
pressure on prices. Uncertainty about
prices destabilizes expectations outside of the sector as banks must increase
loss provisions, reducing their ability to lend. Raskin quoting a Census Bureau study finding that
falling homeownership rates have more than wiped out the increase in
homeownership that had taken place between 2000 and 2007. This is not only a drag on the recovery but
means millions of American families have lost their homes and their hopes and the
impact is felt by the broader community as business investment is undermined,
homelessness increases, and health problems multiply.
To see the kind of economic recovery we want we should start at the
ground level to prevent additional foreclosures; make sure they "take
place only when there is no option available that would be preferable to both
the borrower and the investor."
Servicers must review all options before deciding that foreclosure is
the best course of action and investors need to be supportive of these efforts.
For those in the servicing industry this means difficult changes and
significant investments to rectify broken systems. "For those servicers
who are subsidiaries or affiliates of a broader parent financial institution, the
responsibility for change and further investment absolutely extends up to that
parent company, many of which have enjoyed substantial profits while their
servicing arms have been run on the cheap."
Raskin recalled a speech
she gave in November about the servicing problems that were undermining the performance
of the industry and said they remain unaddressed. Late last year, the federal
banking agencies began a targeted review of loan servicing practices at those large
financial institutions that are heavily into servicing and found widespread
weaknesses that risk mortgage servicing and foreclosure processes, impair the
functioning of mortgage markets, and diminish overall accountability to
homeowners. "I have seen little to no evidence of improvement in the
operational performance of servicers since the onset of the crisis in 2007:
Until these operational problems are addressed once and for all, the
foreclosure crisis will continue and the housing sector will languish."
She called for strong corporate governance servicer procedures that are
monitored and enforced system wide and sound policies and procedures against
which internal operations are assessed. Senior leadership must communicate
performance expectations that hold all business lines accountable to strong
procedural controls. When errors occur, servicers must act swiftly to contain
the damage and they must foster an operational environment that reflects safe
and sound banking principals. Regulators
must be prepared to monitor servicing functions on an ongoing basis. "When servicers misapply payments, lose
paperwork, file incorrect foreclosure affidavits, or simply do not answer the
phone or make available knowledgeable staff persons, there are consequences to
the consumer. With few adequate remedies to provide meaningful recourse in the
event errors occur--after all, it's not as if consumers have a choice regarding
who does their servicing--many consumers find themselves captive to practices
that have emphasized speed and aggressive timeframes over responsiveness,
accuracy, and completeness." "In my mind, massive foreclosures were
always a sign of an equally massive market failure. Well, now it seems to me we
have reached a point where this sign of failure is hindering our economy's
ability to rebound."
Participants in the servicing
industry must change the pricing model.
In addition to float income and ancillary fees, servicers earn money
through an annual fee on each loan which must cover some wildly varying costs. The current model is structured with the hope
that, over a given period of time, there are enough of the low-touch performing
loans to cross-subsidize the high-touch non-performing ones, so that the
overall pool of servicing fee revenue is sufficient to cover expenses and
return a reasonable profit. When that doesn't happen, servicers are either
being paid too much for their efforts or not enough.
The current model also rests on the expectation that, in good times,
servicers are using some of the residual income to build out systems and
procedures to handle the pressures that come with worse times. Unfortunately
this also has not happened.
Raskin called for a business model that would:
-
Closely tie expenses to compensation.
Servicers could be compensated modestly for routine processing of payments
and required to have either sufficient capacity for loss mitigation or
contracts with third parties that do.
-
Require contracts that obligate the investor to pay higher and more
direct compensation for the labor-intensive work involved in delinquent loans
without incentivizing them to encourage delinquency.
-
Provide more clarity and specificity about loss mitigation standards
and systems for auditing internal procedures.
-
Limit the extent to which servicers have to advance principal and
interest on non-performing loans.
-
Set up more detailed pooling and servicing agreements that provide
clarity about what a servicer can and cannot do and that the servicer is
expected to work in the aggregate best interest of the investor regardless of
tranche.
-
Find ways to deal with conflicting interests of senior and junior lien
holders.
Raskin said, "Too many of the practices in the mortgage servicing
industry have been developed and defended solely on the basis of "standard
industry practice," but many practices were not only standard but shoddy,"
and we now see courts rejecting some of those practices.
To rebuild the system we must all play a role. The Federal Reserve needs to consider reforms
that are needed in the realm of strong mortgage lending, but government can
only do so much. Private sector actors
must think beyond their bottom line and focus on how their firms' actions are
or are not contributing to recovery. "It will be essential for each of us
to commit to furthering the good of our nation, our neighborhoods, and our
fellow citizens."
In concluding her speech, Raskin took on the past performance of the housing
industry saying there were too many players in all "functional component
parts" from origination to servicing, "who were interested only in
making their own profits and were indifferent to the consequences of their
actions for homeowners and communities, much less the nation as a whole. This
selfish free-for-all ultimately led to an economic slide the effects of which
are still visible in the boarded-up houses and sheriffs' foreclosure notices
posted all over America."
Only the massive infusion of public dollars into the banking system
prevented collapse. "In other words, the public was forced into a position
where it had to put a lot on the line to save the financial system from its own
follies and from total ruin. And many were bitter about having to do so."
She called on the industry to pay back the American citizenry in full
by supporting those who have been buffeted and injured by the housing
crisis. "When we traveled the low road," she said, "the only
question was: Will this practice make me rich? Taking the high road means we
continually ask: Do our financial and legal arrangements contribute to the
public welfare and the common good?
More from MND:
If you would like to opt-out of receiving email forwards from this person please click here to remove your email address.
This email was sent to you by:
|
Mortgage News Daily
|
 |
Anonymous Loan Representative University Mortgage Hackensack NJ 07601 |
(201) 820-4420 |
Message:
YOUR MESSAGE HERE
Fed Governor Says Housing and Banking Industry Owes America
Federal
Reserve Governor Sarah Bloom Raskin called out housing finance players in a
speech on Friday, reminding them of the "low road" they traveled
before the housing collapse and the debt they owe the American people for rescuing
them from their excesses. She also told
her audience that reforming the servicing industry is "the key to economic
recovery."
Speaking
to the Midwinter Housing Finance Conference in Park City Utah, Raskin said that
in an economic sense the recession is over, but "Americans still looking
for work, living in cars or motels, or trying to keep their businesses out of
bankruptcy would beg to disagree."
The lethargic pace of recovery has many causes but, in her view, the big
drag is the state of the housing sector.
Usually it is the first to recover because of low interest rates and
pent-up demand and is followed by consumer expenditures which magnifies and
multiples the effect of the housing recovery.
Today recovery is hampered both by losses in income and net worth and
by persistent unemployment. With the
pipeline full of distressed properties we might even see further downward
pressure on prices. Uncertainty about
prices destabilizes expectations outside of the sector as banks must increase
loss provisions, reducing their ability to lend. Raskin quoting a Census Bureau study finding that
falling homeownership rates have more than wiped out the increase in
homeownership that had taken place between 2000 and 2007. This is not only a drag on the recovery but
means millions of American families have lost their homes and their hopes and the
impact is felt by the broader community as business investment is undermined,
homelessness increases, and health problems multiply.
To see the kind of economic recovery we want we should start at the
ground level to prevent additional foreclosures; make sure they "take
place only when there is no option available that would be preferable to both
the borrower and the investor."
Servicers must review all options before deciding that foreclosure is
the best course of action and investors need to be supportive of these efforts.
For those in the servicing industry this means difficult changes and
significant investments to rectify broken systems. "For those servicers
who are subsidiaries or affiliates of a broader parent financial institution, the
responsibility for change and further investment absolutely extends up to that
parent company, many of which have enjoyed substantial profits while their
servicing arms have been run on the cheap."
Raskin recalled a speech
she gave in November about the servicing problems that were undermining the performance
of the industry and said they remain unaddressed. Late last year, the federal
banking agencies began a targeted review of loan servicing practices at those large
financial institutions that are heavily into servicing and found widespread
weaknesses that risk mortgage servicing and foreclosure processes, impair the
functioning of mortgage markets, and diminish overall accountability to
homeowners. "I have seen little to no evidence of improvement in the
operational performance of servicers since the onset of the crisis in 2007:
Until these operational problems are addressed once and for all, the
foreclosure crisis will continue and the housing sector will languish."
She called for strong corporate governance servicer procedures that are
monitored and enforced system wide and sound policies and procedures against
which internal operations are assessed. Senior leadership must communicate
performance expectations that hold all business lines accountable to strong
procedural controls. When errors occur, servicers must act swiftly to contain
the damage and they must foster an operational environment that reflects safe
and sound banking principals. Regulators
must be prepared to monitor servicing functions on an ongoing basis. "When servicers misapply payments, lose
paperwork, file incorrect foreclosure affidavits, or simply do not answer the
phone or make available knowledgeable staff persons, there are consequences to
the consumer. With few adequate remedies to provide meaningful recourse in the
event errors occur--after all, it's not as if consumers have a choice regarding
who does their servicing--many consumers find themselves captive to practices
that have emphasized speed and aggressive timeframes over responsiveness,
accuracy, and completeness." "In my mind, massive foreclosures were
always a sign of an equally massive market failure. Well, now it seems to me we
have reached a point where this sign of failure is hindering our economy's
ability to rebound."
Participants in the servicing
industry must change the pricing model.
In addition to float income and ancillary fees, servicers earn money
through an annual fee on each loan which must cover some wildly varying costs. The current model is structured with the hope
that, over a given period of time, there are enough of the low-touch performing
loans to cross-subsidize the high-touch non-performing ones, so that the
overall pool of servicing fee revenue is sufficient to cover expenses and
return a reasonable profit. When that doesn't happen, servicers are either
being paid too much for their efforts or not enough.
The current model also rests on the expectation that, in good times,
servicers are using some of the residual income to build out systems and
procedures to handle the pressures that come with worse times. Unfortunately
this also has not happened.
Raskin called for a business model that would:
-
Closely tie expenses to compensation.
Servicers could be compensated modestly for routine processing of payments
and required to have either sufficient capacity for loss mitigation or
contracts with third parties that do.
-
Require contracts that obligate the investor to pay higher and more
direct compensation for the labor-intensive work involved in delinquent loans
without incentivizing them to encourage delinquency.
-
Provide more clarity and specificity about loss mitigation standards
and systems for auditing internal procedures.
-
Limit the extent to which servicers have to advance principal and
interest on non-performing loans.
-
Set up more detailed pooling and servicing agreements that provide
clarity about what a servicer can and cannot do and that the servicer is
expected to work in the aggregate best interest of the investor regardless of
tranche.
-
Find ways to deal with conflicting interests of senior and junior lien
holders.
Raskin said, "Too many of the practices in the mortgage servicing
industry have been developed and defended solely on the basis of "standard
industry practice," but many practices were not only standard but shoddy,"
and we now see courts rejecting some of those practices.
To rebuild the system we must all play a role. The Federal Reserve needs to consider reforms
that are needed in the realm of strong mortgage lending, but government can
only do so much. Private sector actors
must think beyond their bottom line and focus on how their firms' actions are
or are not contributing to recovery. "It will be essential for each of us
to commit to furthering the good of our nation, our neighborhoods, and our
fellow citizens."
In concluding her speech, Raskin took on the past performance of the housing
industry saying there were too many players in all "functional component
parts" from origination to servicing, "who were interested only in
making their own profits and were indifferent to the consequences of their
actions for homeowners and communities, much less the nation as a whole. This
selfish free-for-all ultimately led to an economic slide the effects of which
are still visible in the boarded-up houses and sheriffs' foreclosure notices
posted all over America."
Only the massive infusion of public dollars into the banking system
prevented collapse. "In other words, the public was forced into a position
where it had to put a lot on the line to save the financial system from its own
follies and from total ruin. And many were bitter about having to do so."
She called on the industry to pay back the American citizenry in full
by supporting those who have been buffeted and injured by the housing
crisis. "When we traveled the low road," she said, "the only
question was: Will this practice make me rich? Taking the high road means we
continually ask: Do our financial and legal arrangements contribute to the
public welfare and the common good?
If you would like to opt-out of receiving email forwards from this person please click here to remove your email address.