This email was sent to you by:
Anonymous |
|
Mortgage News Daily
|
Message: YOUR MESSAGE HERE |
Email alerts, such as this one, are a
free service provided by Mortgage News Daily. If you would like to receive an alert when important news breaks please
register to join our community.
Register with Mortgage News Daily - Registration is free and offers many benefits.
Manage your Email Alerts - Once you're registered, you can manage all MND email alerts on one page, turning subscriptions on or off with one click.
About MND:
Mortgage News Daily combines the expertise of some of the housing industry's leading minds with the power of social media to offer an always lively, constantly evolving web community. MND communicates breaking news, streams video, and provides expert opinion and commentary to a community of interested market professionals and curious consumers.Risk Retention and Transparency in the Mortgage Market
The House Financial Services Committee’s systemic regulator bill, HR 1754, is hung up this month on the proposed risk retention requirements.
The proposal requires creditors to retain 10 percent or more of credit for securitized loans and let regulators adjust that level to between 5 percent and 10 percent. Financial institutions prefer a 5 percent base. The argument over the specific number will be resolved.
The larger issue --- the need for “skin in the game” in the new mortgage lending paradigm --- no one disputes.
Risk retention will establish a necessary sense of ownership and responsibility at the origination end of the home loan process. But any risk retention debate is incomplete unless policymakers give equal weight to time to the need for transparency. One doesn’t work without the other.
Investors in mortgage securities, once that market begins to function on it's own again, will have to be able to look at the characteristics and performance of each loan that makes up the overall pool. Investors will need a reliable monitoring system that provides a view into the performance and payment stream of each mortgage.
That hasn’t existed in the past and the absence of transparency was as much a culprit in the housing collapse as the lack of skin in the game. Crafters of the systemic regulator bill should keep that in mind.
More from MND:
If you would like to opt-out of receiving email forwards from this person please click here to remove your email address.
This email was sent to you by:
|
Mortgage News Daily
|
 |
Anonymous Anonymous |
|
Message:
YOUR MESSAGE HERE
Risk Retention and Transparency in the Mortgage Market
The House Financial Services Committee’s systemic regulator bill, HR 1754, is hung up this month on the proposed risk retention requirements.
The proposal requires creditors to retain 10 percent or more of credit for securitized loans and let regulators adjust that level to between 5 percent and 10 percent. Financial institutions prefer a 5 percent base. The argument over the specific number will be resolved.
The larger issue --- the need for “skin in the game” in the new mortgage lending paradigm --- no one disputes.
Risk retention will establish a necessary sense of ownership and responsibility at the origination end of the home loan process. But any risk retention debate is incomplete unless policymakers give equal weight to time to the need for transparency. One doesn’t work without the other.
Investors in mortgage securities, once that market begins to function on it's own again, will have to be able to look at the characteristics and performance of each loan that makes up the overall pool. Investors will need a reliable monitoring system that provides a view into the performance and payment stream of each mortgage.
That hasn’t existed in the past and the absence of transparency was as much a culprit in the housing collapse as the lack of skin in the game. Crafters of the systemic regulator bill should keep that in mind.
If you would like to opt-out of receiving email forwards from this person please click here to remove your email address.