Register or Sign in        Email This Page     Link To This Page    
Visit MND at MBA in NYC!
# of User Comments
Select a Date
Use the calendar to view news headlines from a specific date.
Today  |  Yesterday  |  Random
Bottom Right Default
State Name: Connecticut
State Name underscore: Connecticut
State Name dash: Connecticut
State Name lower underscore: connecticut
State Name lower dash: connecticut
State Name lower: connecticut
State Abbreviation: CT
State Abbreviation Lower: ct
Suggest a Story
Paste the URL of the story below to submit for editorial review and possible inclusion in ATW.
Please add 7 and 4 and type the answer here:
Leave this field blank.
What is Around the Web?
It is a continuously updated stream of news from around the web
Visit throughout the day for the latest breaking news.
» Click any link below to read more.
  • Mon, Dec 22 2008
  • 10:51 AM » Homeowner Associations: Another Housing Minefield
    Published Mon, Dec 22 2008 10:51 AM by Seeking Alpha
    Tom Lindmark submits: The housing crisis keeps finding more ways to bite homeowners in the butt. The Arizona Republic has a couple of good articles on the problems that homeowners are facing with their homeowner associations. For those of you unfamiliar with the concept, most new subdivisions in the Sunbelt are governed by homeowners' associations, or HOAs. These associations are responsible for the maintenance of the common areas of the subdivision. Often that amounts to no more than a border fence and a small amount of landscaping but in some it includes parks, playgrounds, community centers and swimming pools. Fees for each homeowner can range from a couple of hundred dollars a year to as much as $200 or $300 per month. Many cities now mandate that any new subdivision include a HOA and that it construct parks, bike paths and other recreational facilities thus relieving the municipalities of a burden they used to shoulder.
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: Seeking Alpha
  • 8:46 AM » Morgan Stanley on Subprime (Still Hurting), Real Estate and More
    Published Mon, Dec 22 2008 8:46 AM by Seeking Alpha
    Key quotes from Morgan Stanley's (MS) : Subprime; where it all began, and where it still is:
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: Seeking Alpha
  • 8:30 AM » A Tale of Two Housing Bubbles
    Published Mon, Dec 22 2008 8:30 AM by Seeking Alpha
    submits: A good friend of mine named Steven loves the writings of , and has been sharing them with me. For those who do not know who Spengler is – welcome to the club. Steven claims: Spengler’s identity is not publicized. From comments he makes, he is well-connected. I don't know his real identity and I've never read anyone else who claims to know who he is but he is well-known by his columns.
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: Seeking Alpha
  • 8:30 AM » Property Developers Request Bailout: Report
    Published Mon, Dec 22 2008 8:30 AM by CNBC
    Some of the biggest U.S. property developers are asking for government money in the face of $160 billion in maturing commercial mortgages next year, the Wall Street Journal reported Monday. Topics: | | | | | Sectors: MEDIA:
  • 1:14 AM » National Penn Bank's Rare Customers: No Credit, No Defaults
    Published Mon, Dec 22 2008 1:14 AM by Seeking Alpha
    submits: by David Fessler No Credit… No License… No History? No Problem?
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: Seeking Alpha
  • 12:27 AM » AP study finds $1.6B went to bailed-out bank execs
    Published Mon, Dec 22 2008 12:27 AM by Washington Post
    -- Banks that are getting taxpayer bailouts awarded their top executives nearly $1.6 billion in salaries, bonuses, and other benefits in the calendar year 2007, an Associated Press analysis reveals.
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: Washington Post
  • 12:11 AM » NYT: Blaming Bush for the Wrong Things
    Published Mon, Dec 22 2008 12:11 AM by The Big Picture
    The Sunday New York Times has a more or less blaming Bush for the housing and credit crisis. Its part of their “” series, and it is in some ways, off base. The long article (written by 3 people) comes close to some real truths, but it veers off, focusing on some minor and irrelevant elements. One side note : Critics of newspapers never seem to understand that headlines are not by the article’s author(s), but by an editor. Hence, why the headline focus is sometimes misplaced or emphasizes the wrong issue. This discussion is very nuanced, so if you get most of your news and information from talk radio or any of the Faux channels, well, you shouldn’t bother reading any further. Pursuing this will only hurt make your brain hurt, or make you angry, or both. Let’s start out with a brief excerpt from : From Reagan to George W. Bush, each President of the past 25 years bears some responsibility for contributing to the belief that we can let markets govern themselves. Of the four Presidents over that period of time, President George W. Bush is the one with the seemingly greatest culpability. Not just because this crisis happened on his watch — although that is reason enough to give him a fair share of responsibility. More significantly, the basis of his culpability is that he shared Greenspan’s and Gramm’s radical belief system — that markets could police themselves, and that all regulation was inherently bad. This philosophy colored all of the President’s appointments to key supervisory positions, as well as his legislative agenda. That philosophy, and the executive, administrative and legislative acts, including political appointments, is where we should focus our ire at the soon the be former-President Bush. The belief system that leads to the conclusion that really bad behavior in the corporate world needs no proscribing is where you should look to place blame. That Bush had as a goal increased home ownership is, quite bluntly, irrelevant. It is a worthy goal, and certainly...
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: The Big Picture
  • Sun, Dec 21 2008
  • 3:21 PM » White House & Housing Crisis: Timeline
    Published Sun, Dec 21 2008 3:21 PM by The Big Picture
    Timeline: > courtesy of > Source : JO BECKER, SHERYL GAY STOLBERG and STEPHEN LABATON NYT, December 20, 2008
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: The Big Picture
  • 3:21 PM » The Power of TARP
    Published Sun, Dec 21 2008 3:21 PM by Seeking Alpha
    I for one didn’t realize how over the banks who take TARP funds might end up being. In particular, one provision of the program gives the government the right to “unilaterally amend” the terms under which it hands out its cash. Whoa! When you have a counterparty that happens to be the federal government, and it has a unilateral power to amend its contract with you, you have one powerful counterparty! You’d think banks that don’t absolutely need an infusion would be more wary: The government could increase the dividend it’s being paid for preferred shares, require caps on executive compensation or force banks to halt foreclosures, said David Baris, executive director for the American Association of Bank Directors, in a Nov. 3 letter to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson. . . .
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: Seeking Alpha
  • 8:20 AM » CRA Reader Response
    Published Sun, Dec 21 2008 8:20 AM by Google News
    This is a reader response from Jim Brown (no relation) to our recent post: Jim Brown is a 25 year veteran of the mortgage business managing sales and marketing. If you’d like to respond at length to one of our posts send us an email at Please note responses may be edited for clarity and content. CRA is NOT responsible for this mortgage debacle. Absolutely not. These programs required full documentation at the time of origination. This means borrowers had jobs also known as employment, credit which also means 5 pieces of proven payment, and a down payment verified. Why is everyone looking back to 1977? The answer is right in front of us. Blame can go back to as early as 2000. Banks started the demise by offering option arms, negative amortization and started loosening underwriting eliminating the need for a down payment of 20%, waiving job verification, and accepting credit scores above 620 (today that won’t get you any kind of loan). And people thought “Hey, this Option ARM thing seems to be working,” and loans were coming in. People could afford to borrow more when they only had to pay at say 3% instead of a fully indexed 6.90%. And then what happened? Things started getting really good. The homeowners were losing equity on the low payment which everyone thought was no big deal in a rising market. But several years later they are now losing the equity due to the changes in the Real Estate market. No one was looking were they? In the mean time… The Wall Street companies came along and said we can enhance those old underwriting scenarios which now look like “tough underwriting requirements”. We will do loans to 100% as long as they have a credit score of 620. And if they don’t we can still give them a loan and just charge them higher fees to close. Hey when your down you need a punch to keep you down. This is exactly what a higher rate and more points did to those borrowers. You would also hear, we can do that loan self-employed too. Just get me...
  • 8:05 AM » Lawyers Sought to Help in Foreclosure Cases
    Published Sun, Dec 21 2008 8:05 AM by Washington Post
    When Maryland's chief judge asked the state's lawyers to help homeowners facing foreclosure over the summer, hundreds of lawyers across the state stepped forward, agreeing to provide free legal assistance.
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: Washington Post
  • 8:05 AM » Savers hit as banks slash rates
    Published Sun, Dec 21 2008 8:05 AM by
    Savers have been hit by the interest rate cuts with one in four deposit accounts now paying less than 1 per cent after banks reduced their rates this month, according...
  • Sat, Dec 20 2008
  • 9:13 PM » NY Times: Ideologues Aided Mortgage Crisis
    Published Sat, Dec 20 2008 9:13 PM by Calculated Risk Blog
    From the NY Times: The global financial system was teetering on the edge of collapse when President Bush and his economics team huddled in the Roosevelt Room of the White House for a briefing that, in the words of one participant, “scared the hell out of everybody.” ... Mr. Bush, according to several people in the room, paused for a single, stunned moment to take it all in. “How,” he wondered aloud, “did we get here?” This article makes some interesting points, but misses some of the key causes of the crisis. As an example then Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan isn't even mentioned in the article, and he was counseling Mr. Bush on reducing regulations. The article incorrectly focuses on minority ownership and Fannie and Freddie (a small role in the crisis) and barely touches on Wall Street - and completely ignores the securitization process (a major enabler to the crisis). But there are some interesting quotes: "There is no question we did not recognize the severity of the problems,” said Al Hubbard, Mr. Bush’s former chief economics adviser, who left the White House in December 2007. “Had we, we would have attacked them.” Looking back, Keith B. Hennessey, Mr. Bush’s current chief economics adviser, says he and his colleagues did the best they could “with the information we had at the time.” But Mr. Hennessey did say he regretted that the administration did not pay more heed to the dangers of easy lending practices. And both Mr. Paulson and his predecessor, John W. Snow, say the housing push went too far. “The Bush administration took a lot of pride that homeownership had reached historic highs,” Mr. Snow said in an interview. “But what we forgot in the process was that it has to be done in the context of people being able to afford their house. We now realize there was a high cost.” I'd like to see a mea culpa from Greg Mankiw and few others too. Even this story is from early 2007 when the crisis should have been obvious to everyone: Jason Thomas had a nagging...
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: Calculated Risk Blog
  • 9:13 PM » Executive Pay: Will inflated pay packages get slashed?
    Published Sat, Dec 20 2008 9:13 PM by Washington Post
    A ngelo R. Mozilo, whose Countrywide Financial came to symbolize the failings of the mortgage industry, took home more than half a billion dollars from 1998 to 2007, including $121.7 million from cashing in options last year alone. · Charles O. Prince, who led Citigroup to the brink of disaster, was awarded a retirement deal worth $28 million. · Now, in a show of purported restraint, top Wall Street executives are going without bonuses. · What are we to make of all this? · If you're angry that so many executives got paid so much for screwing up so spectacularly, you might take solace in the fact that shares they still hold have lost value, too. · But if you think executive pay is finally succumbing to the force of gravity -- if you'd like to believe that an epic destruction of investor wealth will fundamentally and permanently change the way chief executives are paid, or that you, dear shareholder, have the power to join forces with others just like you and create a more rational order -- don't bet on it. · The nation's financial crisis could change the rules of executive pay, but if history is any guide, you'll have a lot more to complain about in the years ahead.
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: Washington Post
  • 10:19 AM » So Now We Are Trying to Emulate Japan's Lost Decade?
    Published Sat, Dec 20 2008 10:19 AM by Google News
    US economists have relentlessly harangued the Japanese for their supposed mismanagement of their post bubble era, which has lead to nearly 20 years of low growth, borderline deflation, with a not-much-discussed, robust export sector. Along with others, we complained in the early days of the Fed/Treasury emergency response that they were taking one of the worst elements of the Japanese playbook, namely, trying to prop up the value of dud assets, rather than figuring out how to do more price discovery and ameliorate the attendant reaction (not damage, mind you, the damage was already done when the bad loans were made). Yes, the Treasury has made some capital injections into banks, but without cleaning up the balance sheets, the benefits are limited. Even with supposedly more aggressive action on realizing losses, our banks act a lot like their Japanese pre-writedown zombie counterparts. So in yet another "putting lipstick on a pig" initiatives, the authorities, having unwittingly copied the heretofore-seen-as-failed Japanese playbook, are now trying to reposition Japan as a source of valuable lessons. Trust me, you would never have seen anything along these lines two year ago, starting with the title of the New York Times story "" Pretty soon, we'll have our very own Ministry of Truth (I kid you not, read the article). From the New York Times: The Bank of Japan kept rates near zero for most of the last decade in an effort to end a long economic stagnation, and raised them only two years ago. Many economists say they believe that the zero interest-rate policy finally worked in Japan after regulators took aggressive steps that succeeded in restoring faith in Japan’s financial system and Tokyo’s ability to oversee it. Now, with the Fed and President-elect Barack Obama turning to the same sorts of unconventional policy tools to battle the worst global economic crisis since the Depression, economists and bankers say they hope that Japan’s lessons are...
  • 10:19 AM » M&T Agrees to Buy Provident Bank
    Published Sat, Dec 20 2008 10:19 AM by Washington Post
    M&T Bank has agreed to buy Baltimore's Provident Bankshares for stock valued at $401 million in a deal that will give the merged company a leading market position in Maryland and an expanded presence in Virginia.
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: Washington Post
  • 10:03 AM » Retail Space to be Vacated
    Published Sat, Dec 20 2008 10:03 AM by Calculated Risk Blog
    Back in October, the WSJ that mall vacancy rates increase sharply in Q3: For strip centers and other open-air shopping venues, the vacancy rate climbed to 8.4% in the third quarter from 8.1% in the second quarter. That marks the highest rate since 1994, according to Reis. Meanwhile, retailers' closures outpaced new leases by 2.8 million square feet in U.S. strip centers in the third quarter, the third consecutive quarterly net decline. It is the first nine-month period of so-called negative net absorption since Reis started tracking the data in 1980. ... The vacancy rate at malls in the top 76 U.S. markets rose to 6.6% in the third quarter, up from 6.3% in the previous quarter, to its highest level since late 2001, according to Reis. Click on image for larger graph in new window. This graph shows the strip mall vacancy rate since Q2 2007. Note that the graph doesn't start at zero to better show the change. But clearly it is about to get much worse. Hat tip wc for the following! Pre black Friday closing & liquidation announcements have come from Shoe Pavilion, Steve & Barry's, Gordman's, Radio Shack, JoAnn Fabric, Boscov's, Bennigan's, Winn Dixie, Office Max, Comp USA, Pier 1, and Sigrid Olsen. Of the 2 billion square feet of community/neighborhood retail space in the largest 76 metropolitan areas, vacancy has increased by 0.75% so far in 2008 (source: REIS). This list isn't exhaustive - we could add other retailers closing stores, filing bankruptcy or going out of business such as Sharper Image, Starbucks, The Disney Store, Wilson's Leather, Talbots, Ann Taylor, Bombay Co. and more. In the last 2 months the number and severity of announcements from retailers has gotten worse. Based on press releases, and an estimate of average store size, I believe these 9 retailers [alone] will be leaving about 47 million square feet of space: From the WSJ: Linens 10/14/2008 From MarketWatch: 10/30/2008 From the Consumerist: 12/11/2008 From the...
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: Calculated Risk Blog
  • 10:03 AM » Credit Suisse bankers are livid over getting bonus payments in toxic debt
    Published Sat, Dec 20 2008 10:03 AM by
    Apparently senior bankers at Credit Suisse are none too pleased that much of their bonuses will be paid in some of the toxic assets on the banks books. According to the Wall Street Journal: The announcement elicited livid reactions from...
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

  • 9:48 AM » Loan officers help your clients with their loan modifications
    Published Sat, Dec 20 2008 9:48 AM by Google News
    Disclosure: This post is about a loan modification program I participate in and get paid for. FACT: There’s a huge need out there for people who are experts at loan modifications. Every day more than 500 people visit from the Google search term “loan modification”. Those people need help and I can’t give it to them. They all come to an article I wrote for homeowners, a year ago. Loan officers, are you doing loan modifications as part of your mortgage business? If not you’re throwing away two very valuable things: 1) income and more importantly 2) satisfied customers who can refer you to other folks you can help. Imagine getting 500 leads a day for your business. What would you do with all of them? For me, I share with them an opportunity to do . It’s an ebook that I’m an affiliate for, that I’ve read and used the techniques in and believe in. The man who wrote the book is smart, ethical and experienced. I’ve heard nothing but good things from the people who have bought the book. If loans were my full-time business I’d be doing loan modifications non-stop. If you’re a mortgage broker, loan officer, loan processor, underwriter or account executive who is looking to make additional income you owe it to yourself to check out Richard Geller’s program. He helps you get setup to help others with their loan modifications. It’s easy to get started. You get a full 365-day trial of the program and you get all the tools and techniques you need to be a success and get people the help they need. . Yes, I get paid if you sign up, but I wouldn’t be recommending it if I didn’t think it was a good program. So try it now for 365 days for free. PS. If you’d rather just be an ebook affiliate like me you can sign up here to resell the Loan Mod Magic ebook which is a tremendous resource to anyone looking to do their .
  • 9:48 AM » Stop the FHA Subprime End Run
    Published Sat, Dec 20 2008 9:48 AM by Google News
    Our Friends over at the Mortgage Lender Implode-O-Meter have issed a statement regarding the fishy-smelling goings-on regarding the uncertain future of . Here’s a bit of : The SFDPA practice was completely banned by the July 2008 housing bill, effective October 1st. However, new legislation (HR 6694) is pending to re-enable this form of lending. Bill sponsors claim the loosened rules will help first-time home buyers and the housing market. SFDPA companies, builders, and Realtors have launched a major PR and lobbying campaign to generate support for HR 6694. The ML-Implode statement warns of the risks of creating large amounts of new loans with a negative equity position, which are much more likely to default. It also draws alarming parallels between SFDPA loans (particularly as provided in HR 6694) and zero-down subprime lending. ML-Implode warns that such lending is likely to cause even more damage to the economy than in the recent past, given the current environment of generally-falling home prices. While SFDPA loans may appear to help slow the decline, the site argues they will likely lead to a larger crash in the near future, as the underwater borrowers will default and foreclose at high rates. The program, which was banned earlier this year, is getting funding and lobbying from the usual suspects, Realtors, home builders, etc. And why? Because they stand to gain financially by increasing the pool of eligible home buyers. This is recklessly myopic. The problems with the housing market stem from the endless stream of unqualified buyers and easy credit which artificially inflated demand driving up prices and building massive systemic risk. The ongoing collapse is a testament to the dangers of this type of loose lending. Now, with taxpayers shelling out $700 billion to “save” our economy special interests are trying to make an end run and loosen up FHA. Once again, a government (read: taxpayer) institution is being put at risk by greedy and short-sighted people who...
  • Fri, Dec 19 2008
  • 4:08 PM » Home Builders Wants Mortgage Rates at 2.9 Percent
    Published Fri, Dec 19 2008 4:08 PM by
    The chief executive of the National Association of Home Builders reportedly wants a government program launched to lower interest rates on home loans to 2.9 percent, along with an expanded homebuyer tax credit. With these two initiatives in place, NAHB boss Jerry Howard believes the glut of unsold housing inventory could be off the market in [...]
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

  • 2:50 PM » Q3 2008: Mortgage Equity Extraction Strongly Negative
    Published Fri, Dec 19 2008 2:50 PM by Calculated Risk Blog
    Here are the Kennedy-Greenspan estimates (NSA - not seasonally adjusted) of home equity extraction for Q3 2008, provided by Jim Kennedy based on the mortgage system presented in "," Alan Greenspan and James Kennedy, Federal Reserve Board FEDS working paper no. 2005-41. Click on graph for larger image in new window. For Q3 2008, Dr. Kennedy has calculated Net Equity Extraction as minus $64.1 billion, or negative 2.4% of Disposable Personal Income (DPI). This graph shows the net equity extraction, or mortgage equity withdrawal (MEW), results, both in billions of dollars quarterly (not annual rate), and as a percent of personal disposable income. Dr. Kennedy provides several other measures of equity extraction. The second graph shows what Dr. Kennedy calls "active MEW" (Mortgage Equity Withdrawal). This is defined as "Gross cash out" plus the change in the balance of "Home equity loans". This measure is also slightly negative. The Fed's Flow of Funds report shows the amount of mortgages outstanding is declining, and this is partially because of debt cancellation per foreclosure sales, and partially due to homeowners paying down their mortgages (as opposed to borrowing more). Note: most homeowners pay down their principal a little each month (unless they have an IO or Neg AM loan), so with no new borrowing, equity extraction would always be negative. But this suggests that the Home ATM is closed, and MEW is no longer supporting consumption.
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: Calculated Risk Blog
  • 11:25 AM » Record low mortgage rates toss housing market a lifeline
    Published Fri, Dec 19 2008 11:25 AM by Reuters
    NEW YORK (Reuters) - With the $500 of monthly savings Jim Hennessy just gained by cutting the rate on his $417,000 mortgage in San Diego, he plans on rebuilding his beaten-up retirement savings and maybe even taking a cruise.
  • 10:39 AM » Nothing But Trouble In Store For Investors In This Retail REIT
    Published Fri, Dec 19 2008 10:39 AM by
    BOSTON -- When a stock gets badly beaten down, but has some attractive assets and a big yield, investors have to decide if they want to stick around waiting for a bounce-back. What they often miss out on is the potential for today's big loser to become tomorrow's bankruptcy case and total loss. Simply put, most investors have a hard time believing they could have picked anything that was destined to go to zero, and a tougher time swallowing their pride and recognizing their mistake. And that's why investors stick around with issues like General Growth Properties, a former highflier that has just enough going for it to give a faint sense of hope, but enough going against it to foresee those prayers being crushed. That's why General Growth Properties (GGP) is the Stupid Investment of the Week. Stupid Investment of the Week highlights the conditions and characteristics that make an investment less than ideal for average investors, and is written in the hope that spotlighting flawed thinking in one case will help investors avoid similar missteps elsewhere. Typically, to be included in this column there must be a case for buying the investment in question. In this kind of market, however, buying is off the table for many people, and their bigger choice involves whether to continue or end a buy-and-hold play they made long before the market ever soured. If an investor would not buy an issue again today, there's a good question why it should be held onto in hopes for a return to glory, or at least break-even. In the case of General Growth Properties, about the only good news the company has had recently is that the firm's lenders extended the repayment deadline on $900 million in past-due debt to mid-February. Had that agreement not been reached, the company would have been forced to file for bankruptcy protection. Temporary breathing room is one thing, hope for a comeback is something altogether different. General Growth stock is down more than 95%...
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

  • 10:39 AM » General Growth puts more high-end malls on sale
    Published Fri, Dec 19 2008 10:39 AM by Reuters
    (Reuters) - Mall giant General Growth Properties Inc has put three of its high-end shopping malls -- in Boston, New York, and Baltimore -- up for sale as it moves to pay off about $22 billion of debt within four years.
  • 9:53 AM » SunTrust: Business as Usual?
    Published Fri, Dec 19 2008 9:53 AM by Seeking Alpha
    submits: SunTrust (STI) is a major Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern regional bank. The company has $175 billion in assets with a large residential and commercial real estate involvement. There are close to 1,700 retail branches throughout 9 states. The bank has significant holdings in Coca Cola (KO), which along with SunTrust is based in Atlanta. I deal frequently with SunTrust. We have had accounts with them for several years. The company prides itself on excellent customer service. It is our experience that they do that very well. Personnel are unfailingly helpful and courteous.
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: Seeking Alpha
  • 9:52 AM » The Blame Game Continued: Is CRA at Fault?
    Published Fri, Dec 19 2008 9:52 AM by Google News
    Is it possible that a law enacted to ensure banks serve the needs of the communities the are located in might be at the root of the current financial crisis? The idea that any one thing, be it an agency, a law, an event or a person, bears total responsibility for the situation is patently false. It is, however, important to understand what role each played in getting us here. Preferably before taking drastic measures to repair what may never have been broken or worse, break one of the few things still working. When the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) was enacted in 1977 it was intended to curtail a practice called red-lining in which banks and other depository institutions were reluctant or refused to make loans based the borrowers address. It didn’t matter if the borrower was could repay the loan, nor did it matter whether the loan was a mortgage, home-improvement loan or small-business loan. If the borrower resided or intended the loan to be used in an area the lender did not wish to lend in, such as a low or moderate income neighborhood, small town or rural area, well then the borrower faced significant challenges in getting a loan if they could get one at all. As a result, potential borrowers in these areas relied heavily on mortgage banking companies for financing. As it was originally written, the CRA was a very general piece of legislation. So of course, scarcely a year has gone by that legislators, regulators or the financial industry have not tried tinkering with it. None of these subsequent adjustments ever required depository institutions to make loans that were unsound. “ Any loan that is made must be mindful of the sacred obligations in preserving the integrity of funds,” Robert Buchard, then executive vice president of Keycorp, a holding company based in Albany, NY told ABA Banking Journal in 1989. “These can be self-serving investments in our communities, but it isn’t a hand-out program.” How then did we reach the point where the CRA is a potential scapegoat...
  • 9:52 AM » Has the Housing Price Bubble Deflated?
    Published Fri, Dec 19 2008 9:52 AM by Seeking Alpha
    submits: Interesting set of charts from a by Columbia's real estate guru Chris Mayer showing house prices relative to 50-year trends:
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: Seeking Alpha
  • 9:52 AM » New Limits on Credit Card Companies: Is Hell Freezing Over?
    Published Fri, Dec 19 2008 9:52 AM by Seeking Alpha
    submits: The End of Days must be approaching; for one of the few times I can remember in the past two decades, regulators in the United States of Corporations instead of the corporation. Of course, credit card companies claim this will restrict many from the constant flow of credit. Considering this was the lobby that made bankruptcy far more expensive 2-3 years ago, it's a big change in the atmosphere. Thank you Federal Reserve for doing something for the American people for once. Now, what will be more interesting to find out is, after rules were altered in favor of corporations for a few decades, if this is a short-term stance change or the beginning of an era where the actual citizens of the country matter more than the political donors. Either way, the ethos of "light" or "self" regulation, after burning down the country, seems to be out the door. Let's see if we overreact in the other direction. Surely there is some fair middle ground, but we'll probably miss it. We shall see in a few years.
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: Seeking Alpha
  • Thu, Dec 18 2008
  • 7:49 PM » Banks lent billions to Madoff 'feeder funds'
    Published Thu, Dec 18 2008 7:49 PM by
    Big banks from the UK, France and Japan helped investors treble or quadruple their bets on Bernard Madoff by lending billions of dollars to 'feeder' funds, which placed their money with the alleged fraudster
  • 5:45 PM » Angelo Mozilo Email on Loan Safe Voted #1 Business Blunder in 08′
    Published Thu, Dec 18 2008 5:45 PM by
    Choosing only 10 this year was next to impossible, but somehow we managed. Incidentally, we’d like to throw a special shout out to Angelo Mozilo of Countrywide for making this year’s list extra debacle-riffic. Thanks! – The Consumerist It’s nice to know that our work at Loan Safe and Loan Workout has somewhat of an effect [...]
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

  • 5:29 PM » Hedge fund graveyard: 693 and counting
    Published Thu, Dec 18 2008 5:29 PM by CNN
    A record number of hedge funds went bust during the third quarter, a report showed Thursday, as shaky markets and tight credit drove investors away from risky investments.
  • 5:29 PM » Fed’s Rate Moves Fail to Spur Home Buying
    Published Thu, Dec 18 2008 5:29 PM by The Big Picture
    Refinancing seems to be the only game in town! The Federal Reserve’s efforts to make homes more affordable have yet to bolster buying and instead are fueling a surge in refinancing, according to data compiled by the Mortgage Bankers Association. As the CHART OF THE DAY shows, the association’s index of mortgage applications for home purchases has fallen this year. A similar refinancing gauge has more than doubled in the past month. Last week’s figures came out today. Source: David Wilson Bloomberg, Dec. 17 2008
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: The Big Picture
  • 5:29 PM » Mortgage Related Exec Compensation
    Published Thu, Dec 18 2008 5:29 PM by The Big Picture
    Courtesy of > Source: LOUISE STORY NYT, December 17, 2008
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: The Big Picture
  • 4:12 PM » Treasury sued by Fox Business Network over rescue plan info
    Published Thu, Dec 18 2008 4:12 PM by Market Watch
    WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- FOX Business Network said Thursday it has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Treasury Department for being slow to provide information on the $700 billion financial rescue plan. The television network, a unit of News Corp. , said in a release that Treasury has not responded to two Freedom of Information Act requests, one on Nov. 25 and one on Dec. 1, regarding the use of funds for Citigroup Inc. (C), American International Group Inc.
  • 4:12 PM » Loan Modification Process: It's Still Not Making Sense
    Published Thu, Dec 18 2008 4:12 PM by CNBC
    Posted By: The fact is, modification programs won't work unless the principal on the loan is written down, giving the homeowner at least some financial stake in the house. But we all know how willing lenders are to write down principal. Topics: | | Sectors: | Companies: | MEDIA:
  • 2:53 PM » DataQuick: Almost 50% of Home Sales are Foreclosure Resales in California Bay Area
    Published Thu, Dec 18 2008 2:53 PM by Calculated Risk Blog
    NOTE from CR: be careful with median prices. This doesn't mean prices have fallen to an eight year low - this means that a combination of price declines and a significant change in mix (to lower priced homes) has happened. The Case-Shiller repeat sales index is a better measure of actual price declines. From DataQuick: Bay Area home sales decelerated in November but beat the year-ago mark for the third consecutive month. The allure of discounted foreclosures continued to drive sales in affordable inland markets, which helped push the median sale price down to its lowest point since former President Bill Clinton was in the White House. The median price paid for all new and resale houses and condos combined in the nine-county Bay Area fell to $350,000 last month. That was down 6.7 percent from $375,000 in October and down a record 44.4 percent from $629,000 in November 2007, according to MDA DataQuick, a San Diego-based real estate information service. The November median sale price - the point where half of the homes sold for more and half for less - stood at its lowest since it was $350,000 in September 2000. It was 47.4 percent below the peak median of $665,000 reached last year in June, July and August. ... A total of 5,756 new and resale houses and condos closed escrow in the region last month. That was down 24.4 percent from 7,613 sales in October but up 12.3 percent from 5,127 sales in November 2007. Last month's tally was still the second-lowest for a November since at least 1988, when DataQuick's statistics begin. ... Last month 47.6 percent of all homes that resold in the Bay Area had been foreclosed on at some point in the prior 12 months, up from 44.0 percent in October and 10.1 percent a year ago. ... In November, use of FHA, government-insured mortgages allowing a down payment of as little as 3 percent rose to 20.6 percent of Bay Area home purchase loans. That's a record in DataQuick's statistics and up from less than 1.0 percent a year...
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

    Source: Calculated Risk Blog
  • 1:03 PM » War College IMF, warns military must prep for unrest; economic riots
    Published Thu, Dec 18 2008 1:03 PM by
    "A new report by the U.S. Army War College talks about the possibility of Pentagon resources and troops being used should the economic crisis lead to civil unrest, such as protests against businesses and government or runs on beleaguered banks"
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

  • 11:45 AM » Citigroup says increasing its lending
    Published Thu, Dec 18 2008 11:45 AM by Reuters
    NEW YORK (Reuters) - Citigroup Inc has boosted its lending after receiving government money and has set up a committee of senior executives to make sure it is using those funds properly, according to an internal memo obtained by Reuters.
  • 11:30 AM » Fed Loans Guided by Raters Grading Subprime Debt AAA
    Published Thu, Dec 18 2008 11:30 AM by
    And another glaring absurdity finally gets some media attention: Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke is basing hundreds of billions in emergency lending on credit ratings from companies that gave AAA grades to toxic securities. The Fed has purchased $308.5 billion in commercial paper and lent $631.8 billion under eight credit programs, most of which require appraisals of short-term debt and loan collateral by “major nationally recognized statistical ratings organizations.” That, in effect, means Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings. It is foolhardy to rely on the three New York-based companies, said Keith Allman, chief executive officer of Enstruct Corp., which trains investors in financial modeling and asset valuation. The major raters issued top marks to $3.2 trillion in subprime mortgage-backed securities at the root of the financial crisis. “They’re outsourcing the credit assessment to a group of people whose recent performance has been unbelievably bad,” said Allman, the New York-based author of three books on structured finance and a former vice president in Citigroup Inc.’s securitized markets unit. “If their goal is to not take a loss on these assets, they should be hiring independent analysts.”
    Click Here to Read the Full Article

Did you know?
You can see a list of all comments on MND by clicking the 'Read the Latest Comments' option under the 'Community' menu.

More From MND

Mortgage Rates:
  • 30 Yr FRM 3.04%
  • |
  • 15 Yr FRM 2.67%
  • |
  • Jumbo 30 Year Fixed 3.38%
MBS Prices:
  • 30YR FNMA 4.5 108-05 (0-01)
  • |
  • 30YR FNMA 5.0 109-18 (-0-01)
  • |
  • 30YR FNMA 5.5 111-05 (0-10)
Recent Housing Data:
  • Mortgage Apps 6.77%
  • |
  • Refinance Index 8.83%
  • |
  • Purchase Index 3.42%