Top News


Mortgage Rates
30 Yr FRM 5.32% -0.10%
15 Yr FRM 4.77% -0.10%
1 Yr ARM 4.94% 0.01%
5/1 Yr ARM 4.88% -0.11%
30 YR Tres 4.32% 0.00%
Fed Prime 3.25% 0.00%
Receive Free Email Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news and blog posts with our free News Alert Service.  Or if you are already a member, click here to login.

Paulson Says GSEs Need a Strong Regulator

   |     Print   |     Bookmark

Speaking to the Senate Banking Committee as part of the Humphrey-Hawkins testimony, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) need a strong regulator.

"Market stability and support for housing finance are among my highest priorities during this time of stress in our markets. Therefore, after consultations with the Federal Reserve, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Congressional leaders, we are asking Congress, as it completes its work on a stronger GSE regulatory structure, to also enact a three-part plan to address the current situation," Paulson said.

Paulson said Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose systemic risks, adding that the GSE backstop was not prompted by a sudden decline in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.



The Treasury secretary went on to say that an appropriate size of GSE credit line is difficult to gauge and that there were no immediate plans by GSEs to access the credit line.

"Given the difficulty in determining the appropriate size of the credit line we are not proposing a particular dollar amount. Flexibility is the best means of increasing market confidence in the GSEs, and also the best means of minimizing taxpayer risk," Paulson said.

In a Q&A session preceding his testimony, Paulson addressed questions concerning the GSE bailout plan.

Paulson said that the unlimited credit line would provide flexibility to GSEs, and that he hopes the authority would not have to be used.

He told the senate committee that 18 months should be a sufficient period for the turmoil to end. "The treasury has no plans currently to invest in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac," he said.

The proposal is aimed at increasing confidence in the GSEs and can address short-term and long-term issues, Paulson said. He added that limiting equity purchases and aid to GSEs would affect confidence and prove to be a self-defeating action in the end.

Paulson told the senate committee that confidence in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are essential to confidence in the U.S. markets.

An overarching regulator would give "great confidence" to the market, Paulson said, and confirmed that the unlimited line of credit will minimize the cost to taxpayers. Paulson added the current credit line is outdated.

Paulson said that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will have strong shares, but that it will take time for the market to evaluate the value of the shares. He vehemently denied any intentions of nationalizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Paulson added that the Presidents Working Group recommendation is to strengthen infrastructure and that action on GSE's should be taken quickly. He commented that the President is highly committed to passing GSE reform and has also been a vocal supporter of the measures taken by the SEC.

When discussing the role that Treasury should play, Paulson noted that the Fed should have a regulatory role, while Treasury should maintain a consultative role.

Joining the testimony, Securities Exchange Commissioner Christopher Cox told the Senate Banking Committee that the SEC will prosecute those short-selling and spreading false rumours.

The SEC has invoked emergency rules on shor- selling Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares to remain in effect for 30-days. Cox said that the combination of short-selling and rumours spreading can be dangerous.

Cox told the committee that the SEC is getting better at prosecuting those who spread false rumours. He added that management should be held accountable to shareholders.

By Steve Stecyk, Sarah Sussman, Nancy Girgis
©CEP News Ltd.


Comments

Join Now to Post Comments

M Calvit
on Tue, Jul 15 2008 7:00 AM
Nobody has been able or willing to mark to market. At this time it is impossible. From what I understand about Paulson, his approach will bankrupt this country soner than later. Throwing more laws at the problem a only a bandage for a gushing wound. I am a Florida lawyer working with more and more people every day trying to keep them in their homes. There are already laws in place to defend most of the folks I represent. Many of them come to me with perfect credit and are paid up on their loans, however they are having trouble buying anything else like food and gas to go to work. They want to do the right thing and try to modify their loans before they go into default but the lenders are telling them they are great customers and there is nothing they can do! Even after they go into foreclosure the lenders are unwilling to mitigate the loss. I have had people in their homes for over 2 years and have not made a single payment. This is not for lack of trying, but the lenders refuse to do anything about it, even though we have judges sympathetic to the problem and are doing everything they can to "encourage" lenders to come to the table. The lenders don't care about their borrowers, the economy or even taking back properties which mean even more expense and diminished investor value. The CEOs will take their golden parachutes of 30 million or more and leave the problem behind for all of us to deal with waiting for the bailouts. In 2002, Bush promised that by 2006 over 500,000 low income people would own their own homes. Well...here we are. Whoever becomes the next president will inherit one monsterous pile of steaming poop.