Learn. Share. Connect. (51,920 Members)  - Join
 


Site Tools

Join Now or Sign In
for Full Access to All Features
Mortgage Rates
30 Yr FRM 4.98% -0.05%
15 Yr FRM 4.40% -0.06%
1 Yr ARM 4.47% -0.10%
5/1 Yr ARM 4.35% -0.07%
30 YR Tres 4.40% -0.01%
Fed Prime 3.25% 0.00%
Receive Free Email Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news and blog posts with our free News Alert Service

Another Attempt to Ameliorate the Housing Situation Proposed

by Glenn Setzer on
 Email Page (New!)   |     Print   |     Bookmark

It took a while to saddle up the horses, but now it seems as though everyone is riding to the rescue.

Senate Democrats Thursday announced The Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008 which is intended to address the national housing crisis, help homeowners avoid foreclosure and assist communities that have already been harmed by foreclosures to recover.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) in announcing the package stated that "Since last year Senate Democrats have been moving quickly to ensure more Americans will be able to stay in their homes and we have made some progress. But in the face of an uncertain economy and with so many Americans struggling, we know that more needs to be done to address the housing crisis." He estimated that the provisions planned for the legislation will help over 1 million people stay in their homes and help families and communities avoid problems in the future.

The proposed legislation will increase available funds for pre-foreclosure counseling by $200 million. This, according to Reid's website, should assist as many as one-half million additional families to connect with appropriate mortgage representatives and explore available options to keep them in their homes.

A second, potentially far-reaching provision would change the bankruptcy code to remove the prohibition on modifying the mortgages of debtors in bankruptcy. While the existing code allows judges to modify mortgages on vacation homes and family farms, they can not do this with a primary residence. Modifications would be done only for those who meet strict income and expense criteria but these changes, if enacted, might assist more than 600,000 families to keep their homes.

The current cap on Housing Finance Agencies (local entities) bonds would be raised by $10 billion. Proceeds from these mortgage revenue bonds can be used to refinance subprime loans, assist first-time home buyers with mortgages, and provide funding for multifamily rental housing. It is hoped that raising this cap will create new jobs, generate federal, state, and local revenues and stimulate home-related consumer spending.

Communities with the highest foreclosure rates will be able to access Community Development Block Grant funds to purchase homes that have been foreclosed and remain unsold, blighting neighborhoods and lowering property values. Funds will also be available to assist communities in rehabbing these homes if required and then to rent or re-sell them.

The proposed legislation also attempts to avoid similar foreclosure problems in the future by changing loan disclosures and timing on mortgage documents.

The changes would amend the Truth-in-Lending Act and improve the disclosures about loans that are given to homebuyers both when they apply for a purchase money mortgage and when they refinance. Firms would be required to disclose the terms of the mortgage loan within three days of application and at least 7 days before closing. The borrower would also be informed of the maximum payment the loan could ever require (also within the 3 and 7 day requirements) and would increase the damages for violating the Truth-in-Lending disclosure provisions from $2,000 to $5,000 per violation.

Senator Reid did not indicate how long he thought it would be before this legislation, provided it is passed by both Houses and signed by the President, takes effect or from where the funding would come.


Comments

Join Now or Login to Post Comments

vak
on
This legislation is a joke. It is selective. Reid should stay out of things he knows nothing about.
anonymous
on
Regarding the "improvement" in the truth-in-lending act how is it proposed to disclose the "highest payment that could ever be required"? Adjustable mortages rely on indices that we cannont predict what the rate will be 5 years from now. Unless they are proposing a crystal ball so we can all know the future movement and rate of all indices this improvement seems a bit impossible. I do agree with simplification of the current disclosures and not adding more verbage that will not be read or understood.
Patti
on
When is someone out ther going to offer up a program to help the people that have already gone through a loan adjustment. Our mortgage went from 1054.00 to 1577.61 and if the rate go back up we are looking at a payment of around 1900.00. My husband is a 100% permanent and totally disabled veteran, he suffer a catastrophic illness one month after we purchased our home, we fell behind in the payments caught back 7 months ago have not been late since that time, and still we cannot refinance due to our scores. so pretty soon we will be one of the loans in forclosure. Is there someone out there that can address this please. Thanks
steve gatter
on
Please, no more disclosures. Borrowers are buried with them now. The too many disclosures already required are too often not read and when read, not understood. Instead can we think in terms of simplification - fewer disclosures with fewer words in borrower friendly format.
hosanna
on
We need more stated loans and of course lower rates and we need wisdom on how the value of the properties will not go down so that people can refinance their house especially loans with option arm programs... thanks...
Gary
on
Has anyone considered the proposed act's effect on future borrowing costs for homebuyers and whether and to what extent this and similar efforts to modify mortgage terms (e.g., interest rate freeze, principal reduction) contribute to the inability of banks and investors to value securities linked to residential mortgage loans? and, whether and to what extent banks and investors' inability to value securities linked to mortgages contributes to illiquidity in the secondary market? it seems everyone agrees illiquidity in the secondary mortgage market exacerbated the current stress, yet this and similar legislation fail to consider their impact in restoring confidence in the secondary market of investors and therefore liqudity in the secondary market. liquidity will not return to the secondary market without eliminating the uncertainties surrounding potential loan modifications.
Summer
on
I definitely agree with you Steve. Our huge stack of disclosures keeps getting larger b/c no one wants to take responsibility for their actions and decisions. They sue on a whim and thus creates another disclosure that says the same thing as the others but changes the wording for those that like to play on words. I believe the problem is not the disclosures, it is partially frivolous loan officers that were seeking to get deals done fast and not taking into consideration what is best for their customer. A good loan officer would take their job seriously and take the time to thoroughly explain to the borrower the terms of the financing so there is no confusion. However, it is an overall epidemic crisis that is largely responsible which is none other than GREED. We, Americans, want what we can't afford and we want it now. The subprime loan were largely for the market of people that either had credit flaws or could not really afford the payments on conventional loan products for the the house they wanted. This attitude is what I largely attribute the problem to what we are seeing. At what point does one consider that when they sign the dotted line, it should be well thought out and calculated understanding the terms. Where does personal responsibility come into play? It boiled to down to supply and demand. The consumer demands that they want a certain lifestyle....the look of the "American Dream" and the mortgage companies and the investors that backed them took the risk and took advantage of consumers by offering bogus terms to supply the consumers demand. None of it is right and it is why this economy is in the trouble it is in overall. We as American are not taught to live with in our means but to do whatever we have to do to get what we want! At the end of the day, there is also great responsibility that should fall on the consumer to read and seek to understand before they sign any legally binding contract. Most do not read b/c they are overwhelmed by their excitement. Because of this, I talk my customer through the disclosures and make sure they are aware of the terms. Consumers need to be realistic about their financial situation and know what payment they can afford and look for a house with that in mind. So many times it is hard to get a client to ureason this out because they don't like the houses in there price range and they end up maxing out on there ratio's instead to have instant satisfaction. As a loan officer, we should try to be a voice of reason because the client is emotionally thinking. We need to present options to them such as renovating and building equity for a second home. What happened to planning and goal setting? Yes, it means we must be educators and counselors but your clients will appreciate it after it is all said and done and you will create customers for life. You benefit in the long run with this approach!
JOHN TAYLOR
on
I live in Los Angeles, CA where the conforming loan limit will increase. I know this will have an affect on refinancing but will it also drive up equity as well? Can someone advise of this? Thank You
Richard
on
BAIL-OUT!!! Why don't we allow people to suffer the consequences of their actions . . . it is a foreign concept called PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY! So, those of use that were fiscally responsible and live within our means will end up paying (through taxation) for the homes of those individuals that chose to buy more house than they could afford through "creative" mortgages . . . sickening!!!
Anonymous
on
These "helps" are not reaching a sector of people with rate adjustment problems. There are people with excellent credit scores who bought in the past 3 years, their rate adjusted on Dec 31st, their home equity is now zero or minus zero.. They cannot refinance, because not 80% LTV, they are not eligible for the rate freeze unless they miss 3 house payments, they are not eligible for anything, except pay the payments, they did not intend on living there past their rate adjustment date, but due to the market diving, they could/can not sell. THEY ARE STUFFED. ALL they can do is pay or walk away off into the sunset. They call their lender...the lender says if you don't pay 3 payments, we can help you, if you are current, we cannot do a thing.
anonymous
on
Why cant there be a program that is a modification agreement for anyone that has an MTA program or adjustable program, that they can refinance on a graduated payment program or freeze the rate for like 3 years. The client can take out payments for principal, interest, taxes and insurance and these amounts to be put in a bank account that cannot be withdrawn. The only withdrawal is to make mortgage payments as a direct deposit. The banks will have moneys deposited into their account and at the same time the house values would not be coming down. This would help the stabilization of value of homes. Foreclosures or delinquencies does not help anyone......These refinances or modifications would be called " a roll over" no credit, no income....it would be only for homestead exemption properties. There are a lot of families that both are in either mortgages or real estate that are having issues and they are spending everything they have saved to pay their mortgage. Please help out....These types of loans would not cost the taxpayers. The banks are paying the attorneys for foreclosures, reducing values of houses on short sales and then they have to pay the realtor commission. Let's put money back into our economy and not have values of homes go down more. Good hard working people are being hurt.
Ike
on
There isn't a perfect solution for the housing crisis, but I am offering a few that might help alleviate the situation: 1. No matter what happens, a majority of the subprime loans will go into foreclosure, but with some due deligence and early intervention, lenders can lessen their losses. Foreclosures will happen because the balk of the users of those types of loans purchase because they wanted to take advantage of the easy credit being offered by the overzealous lenders to buy properties they hope would go up in value and benefit thorough a quick resale or a line of credit within 1 or 2 yrs. This applies even with the so-called owner occupied homes. If you noticed, during the housing BOOM people moved more often to take advantage of the equity in their homes. With the help of local non-profit organizations, we need to re-qualify borrowers, Establish the ability for continued payments on their primary homes, only this time we'll go non-traditional in the qualification process. I mean that we will use spousal income or a qualified co-borrower's income to help qualify without having to pull a credit history again on either party. Next time I'll give suggestions on special terms that would lessen the risk of future delinquencies. Those who prove ineligible (maybe the ones who should not have had a mortgage in the first place) will be asked to sign over the deed and given 30 days to move out. This would eliminate the long and time consuming foreclosure process and cut lenders's losses. To be continued. Ike
Rob
on
I have been in banking for 22 years and I have never sold one MTA or negative amoritization product. When a client ask for one of those after I explained how the loan could modify or recast the client chose an ARM or fixed rate no negative am product. I believe it is 100% the fault of the Lender and or the Broker for not qualifing the borrower properly to see if indeed they were able to handle these types of mortgages or for even offering the product to begin with. They just saw the 3 points or more they were making in YSP and slammed them into these loans. Unfortunatley this industry is getting exactly what it deserves and most lenders who closed their doors for preditory lending I say good riddens. Brokers are one step below Laywers and car salesman as they prey on their next victim. This industry got the douche it needed and gave congress the wake up call it need, but it did so on the backs of the American Public.
Anonymous
on
Patti - Have you looked in to a VA Loan? You may be able to refinance that way, even with a low credit score.