Top News


Mortgage Rates
30 Yr FRM 5.32% -0.10%
15 Yr FRM 4.77% -0.10%
1 Yr ARM 4.94% 0.01%
5/1 Yr ARM 4.88% -0.11%
30 YR Tres 4.32% 0.00%
Fed Prime 3.25% 0.00%
Receive Free Email Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news and blog posts with our free News Alert Service.  Or if you are already a member, click here to login.

Treasury Secretary Advocates GSE Assistance for High-End Borrowers

   |     Print   |     Bookmark

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced Monday that he was in favor of temporarily lifting the dollar limit on loans purchased by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, allowing them to provide a market for so-called "jumbo mortgages."

Under current rules, the two government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) cannot purchase loans that exceed $417,000. Paulson is advocating that this limit be lifted and appeared not to disagree with earlier suggestions by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke that the new limit could be as much as $1 million. Paulson stressed, however, that he did not favor raising the loan limits forever, only until the current credit crunch eases.



Such a change, Paulson said, may help "jump start" the market for the largest home loans and would be part of a package of legislative changes which the administration has long sought to reform federal regulation of the two corporations by strengthening the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight.

Paulson suggested the changes during a speech in Orlando, Florida which is part of a three-state swing to quiet critics who have said that he did not act quickly enough to aid borrowers at risk of defaulting as their home values dropped and their interest rates reset.

The Treasury Secretary, however, did not address other limits on the GSE's lending ability. Freddie and Fannie are both working under caps on their portfolios which they say are hampering their ability to assist borrowers and lenders in the current credit crisis. Under the current rules Freddie and Fannie can facilitate the sale of mortgage loans to secondary market investors but cannot keep loans for their own portfolios above a level tied to their capital reserves. At first glance it would seem that increasing the limits on individual loans would mean that the GSE's would be able to fund fewer loans before hitting those portfolio caps.
The Treasury chief rejected recent suggestions by former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan that government money be used to rescue Americans at risk of losing their homes. "This program is attempting to prevent a market failure and do so without government money," he said. "We are not touching the contracts in place."


Comments

Join Now to Post Comments

Anonymous
on Fri, Dec 21 2007 8:00 AM
Oh goodie! Just what I wanted for Christmas to pay for someone else's million dollar home. To the commenter above, get a clue, if the money to purchase these homes isn't available the prices will have to come down.
reality
on Fri, Dec 21 2007 8:00 AM
This is another bad idea. If a loan is worth writing then the private sector will do it. All this does is to allow more bad loans to be guaranteed by the U.S. tax payer. In my opinion they should close all of these government (Tax Payer guaranteed) programs before they become defaulting loan garbage dumps! The loan underwriting will only change if there is no bailout!
Connie
on Fri, Dec 21 2007 8:00 AM
It is about time for them to start thinking about this, but they should stop thinking and do it! California should be a high market state and the limits should reflect this.
Austrian School
on Sat, Dec 22 2007 8:00 AM
The GSE charter was for affordable housing, not bailing out private banks at the tax payers expense on million dollar loans. The market needs even more artifically cheap loans like a drunk needs more booze. Its policies like these that make housing prices high in the first place, and now they want inflate prices even more?
mortgage chic
on Sun, Jan 6 2008 8:00 AM
Yes, it IS about time to raise the GSE limits. The secondary market is pretty much non existant right now... they aren't buying good loans OR bad loans. The lenders are depleting their liquidity by keeping these jumbos on their books, and soon, even the most eligible and deserving borrowers are going to have even more difficulty purchasing or refinancing. The ROE on government loans is nowhere near what it is when they are sold to secondary, but at least it's something...
Alex
on Tue, Jul 8 2008 7:00 AM
I dont know where you all live, but where I live the only house you can buy with the current limits are for the people with poor credit anyways. We have to pay about 750k for a nice home.(3000ft. 4 bed 21/2 bath) I dont believe we should be financing super homes, but why should we have to pay over 7% when they pay 6% or less. 1% difference pays for half of the prop. tax on the place. It makes a difference to us too!