Based on complaints from the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) a California court has shut down the
operations of two alleged loan modification scams based in the state but operating
throughout the U.S. CFPB said it believes that thousands of
homeowners were defrauded of more than $10 million by the Gordon Law Firm and
the National Legal Help Center.
CFPB's complaints allege violations of
the Dodd-Frank Act and Regulation O, formerly
known as the Mortgage Assistance Relief Services Rule. These laws prohibit
unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices and protect distressed
homeowners from mortgage relief scams. Both complaints allege that the defendants:
-
Illegally charged large upfront fees
before services were provided. The
defendants in both cases allegedly collected fees typically ranging between
$1,000 and $4,500 early in the process for services that seldom materialized.
-
Used deceptive language and mailings
with government logos and other markings in order to appear their mortgage
relief services were sponsored by or associated with government programs or
agencies.
-
Misrepresented
their qualifications, claiming they were experienced negotiators who would substantially reduce mortgage
payments, and that they would identify legal violations by consumers' banks or
mortgage companies to use as leverage in loan modification negotiations.
However, it appears that defendants failed to provide meaningful relief for
consumers.
-
Told financially distressed
consumers to avoid interactions with their lenders and to stop mortgage
payments because the defendants would provide relief, potentially putting the
consumers unknowingly at risk of losing their homes and/or ruining their credit
scores.
The CFPB also alleges that,
after the fees were illegally collected the defendants in both cases typically
stopped returning consumers' phone calls and emails. In the end, many consumers
learned that the defendants had not contacted their lenders or obtained any
meaningful relief for them. Ultimately, homeowners across the country lost
thousands of dollars each and suffered significant economic injury, including
losing their homes.
The CFPB is targeting loan
modification operations that attempt to disguise their false promises of relief
for struggling homeowners with claims that they are performing legal work or
are a law firm. The Bureau is also particularly concerned with schemes that
attract victims with false claims that they are endorsed by or represent the
government. These tactics are used by mortgage relief scams to attract victims,
add credibility to their schemes, or exploit certain legal exemptions for the
practice of law.
CFPB sought an injunction
against National Legal Help Center and its principals Najia Jalan and Richard
K. Nelson on December 3. The two
California residents appear to have targeted consumers in all 50 states,
falsely claiming they would provide legal representation even though the
individual defendants are not attorneys and consumers received no actual legal
representation. They also falsely claimed that, for a fee, they could
help consumers get benefits from government-affiliated programs including the
nationwide mortgage servicing settlement and that they were associated with the
Independent Foreclosure Review program overseen by the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Reserve. . The accused
were initially brought to the attention of CFPB by the Office of the Special
Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program and Treasury's Office
of Financial Stability.
Action was brought against the
Gordon Law Firm and California residents Chance Edward Gordon and Abraham
Michael Pessar and their companies last July. The CFPB alleges they are
responsible for operating a network of mortgage loan modification businesses
that targeted consumers in over 25 states. The defendants allegedly gained
homeowners' trust by using Gordon's "law firm" status and led consumers to
believe that a law firm was working with their banks and mortgage companies to
modify mortgage loans or provide foreclosure relief, while the defendants
typically failed to deliver relief.