Learn. Share. Connect. (52,391 Members)  - Join
 


Site Tools

Join Now or Sign In
for Full Access to All Features
Mortgage Rates
30 Yr FRM 4.78% -0.05%
15 Yr FRM 4.29% -0.03%
1 Yr ARM 4.35% 0.00%
5/1 Yr ARM 4.18% -0.07%
30 YR Tres 4.23% -0.02%
Fed Prime 3.25% 0.00%
Receive Free Email Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news and blog posts with our free News Alert Service

Home Prices Higher in August. Will Housing Continue to Stabilize?

by Adam Quinones on
 Email Page (New!)   |     Print   |     Bookmark

Standard and Poor's released the Case Shiller Home Price Index this morning.

The S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices are constructed to accurately track the price path of typical single-family homes located in each metropolitan area provided. Each index combines matched price pairs for thousands of individual houses from the available universe of arms-length single family homes sales data. The indices have a base value of 100 in January 2000; thus, for example, a current index value of 150 translates to a 50% appreciation rate since January 2000 for a typical home located within the subject market.

The size of the housing market combined with the broad influences it has over the economy make the real estate sector a reliable leading indicator of economic activity. Real estate is one of the first sectors to contract when a recession is looming and one of the first to show signs of recovery when economic activity begins to improve.

Last month, S&P Case/Shiller Home Price data indicated the housing market continued to stabilize in 18 of the 20 metropolitan areas surveyed in July. Thirteen of the 20 metro areas saw prices increase for three or more consecutive months, this trend indicated that the deflationary spiral in the housing market may have come to an end. In July the 20 city index rose 1.6% and the 10 city composite increased by 1.7%.

This month, the S&P Case Shiller Home Price Index continued to improve as prices in 17 of 20 metro cities increased in August, albeit at a slower pace than July. Overall, the 20-city index rose 1.2%, better than economist expectations for a read of +0.7% and the 10-city home price index increased at a rate of 1.3%. Year over year the 20-city index is 11.3% lower, again better than the market's expectation of -11.9%.

From the S&P/Case Shiller Press Release...

Data through August 2009, released today by Standard & Poor’s for its S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices, the leading measure of U.S. home prices, show that the annual rate of decline of the 10-City and 20-City Composites improved compared to last month’s reading. This marks approximately seven months of improved readings in these statistics, beginning in early 2009.

The chart above depicts the annual returns of the 10-City and 20-City Composite Home Price Indices, declining 10.6% and 11.3%, respectively, in August compared to the same month last year. Nineteen of the 20 metro areas and both Composites showed an improvement in the annual rates of decline with August’s readings compared to July. Cleveland was the only exception.

Broadly speaking, the rate of annual decline in home price values continues to improve” says David M. Blitzer, Chairman of the Index Committee at Standard & Poor’s. “The two Composites and 19 of the 20 metro areas showed an improvement in the annual rates of return, as seen through a moderation in their annual declines. Looking at the monthly data, 17 of the MSAs and both Composites saw price increasesed in August over July. While many of the markets remain down versus this time last year, the relative rate of decline has shown some real improvement. California, in particular, has seen some real positive prints in recent months. We see this general trend whether you look at the as-reported data or the seasonally adjusted figures. Once again, however, we do want to remind people of the upcoming expiration of the Federal First-Time Buyer’s Tax Credit in November and anticipated higher unemployment rates through year-end. Both may have a dampening effect on home prices.”

The chart above shows the index levels for the 10-City and 20-City Composite Indices. As of August 2009, average home prices across the United States are at similar levels to where they were in the autumn of 2003. From the peak in the second quarter of 2006 through the trough in April 2009, the 10-City Composite is down 33.5% and the 20-City Composite is down 32.6%. With the relative improvement of the past few months, the peak-to-date figures through August 2009 are -30.2% and -29.3%, respectively.

In terms of annual declines, all metro areas and the two composites remain in negative territory, albeit most showing an improvement over the previous month’s figures. Dallas and Denver are continuing their trend from the past month, edging closer into positive territory with August figures of -1.2% and -1.9%, respectively. In addition, both New York and San Diego have emerged out of double-digit declines. New York was down 9.6% in August and San Diego was down 8.9%.

In the monthly data, only Charlotte, Cleveland and Las Vegas reported monthly declines in August over July. Minneapolis and San Francisco reported positive returns greater than +2.0%, and nine of the MSAs plus the two Composites reported monthly returns greater than +1.0%.

Since its launch in early 2006, the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices have published, and the markets have followed and reported on, the non-seasonally adjusted data set used in the headline indices. For analytical purposes, Standard & Poor’s does publish a seasonally adjusted data set covered in the headline indices, as well as for the 17 of 20 markets with tiered price indices and the five condo markets that are tracked. A summary of the monthly changes using the seasonally adjusted (SA) and non-seasonally adjusted (NSA) data can be found in the table below.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Another report that indicates the housing market continues to stabilize.

Just as we discussed in the two most recent housing data releases,Existing Home Sales and Housing Starts, while we are encouraged by the trend of rising home price, we are unable to provide a forward looking outlook that does not include skepticism regarding the extent to which the perceived recovery will continue.

Indeed, falling home prices have rebounded as home sales increased thanks to historically low mortgage rates, the FTHB tax credit, and record home affordability. However, when looking ahead, economic assumptions are distorted by the question: Can Housing Continue to Stabilize?

While the true test of stabilization will come in the near future when the tax credit expires, there several long term 'issues' that must be overcome before a housing stabilization can sustain momentum and evolve into a widely accepted recovery (accepted by home buyers, economists, and the market).

Just a few: Pending foreclosures, HAMP re-defaults, tightening lending guidelines, further job losses, a lack of new job creation, weaker borrower credit profiles, appraisal discrepancies, shadow inventory, the Federal Reserve's exit from the secondary mortgage market....

FEEL FREE TO ADD TO THE LIST!

READ MORE ON OUR EXPECTATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OF THE HOUSING MARKET


Comments

Join Now or Login to Post Comments

on
Back to the YSP issue. I have racked my brains in trying to find one possible reason that YSP is detrimental for a consumer. Can anyone enlighten me on this? Thinking totally unbiasedly, I can only think of positive results from YSP. Please someone tell me one good reason why YSP should go. Does anyone think that some of the huge lending institutions may be lobbying for this to eliminate competition through wholesale. I just dont get it.
on

The general consensus is that YSP results in a higher rate than the consumer actually qualifies for being sold to the consumer for the sake of profit..... Thus the consumer is paying more in interest than they should.... What they are not taking into account is the competition, quality of service and cost offsetting that YSP provides..... If it goes away then the consumer will have higher rates, get less service, and pay more for their rates... The credit card legislation is a perfect example...politicians think they are doing good by the consumer but what has happened with that? Higher rates to everyone, higher costs to everyone, and you got it poor service levels..... Another example of politicians trying to fix something that A) is not broken and B) as a majority they know nothing about... It all comes down to the fact that the average consumer is partially educated and entirely uninformed when it comes to financial matters.....why do politicians care when they get special loans from Leo anyway!!!!! My rant for the day...

on
Good rant, however, I strongly disagree that YSP results in a higher rate, especially when the consumer has the choice of no closing cost loans, low closing cost loans, and buydowns. YSP created competition, thus the ability to find a lower rate in the market. Instead of the government eliminating YSP due to higher costs, why dont they eliminate all these risk based pricing through Fannie and Freddie. Ive alwas thought of YSP as a tool to drive down the cost to consumers. On a last note, politicians get compensated for "working", why shouldnt we have the ability to support our families in this industry. The eliination of YSP will surely raise costs for the consumer, without a doubt!!!!!! It seems that everything Uncle Sam is trying to do to help consumers is hurting them and the housing industry. I think they are essentially trying put a band-aid over the original problem of shady loans from over 2 years ago. The gov't has used a reactive approach to this mess rather than a proactive one. There my rant for the day.
on
Stuart, The abuses of YSP have been at the forefront of media--Option ARMs sold with 3 year prepays to garner a 4% yield spread with no recognizable borrower benefit and higher margin upon reset--borrowers put into 2/28 option ARMS with 2 year prepays with 2-3% YSPs where the YSP was not used to reduce costs. But you're on the right track: we have to bang the drum of how this benefits consumers and educate the media and politicians that all YSP is not bad. Politicians don't care about our ability to support our families in this industry when their perception is that we created the monster that has devastated the household wealth of so many families across the country. Challenge is changing that mindset --and at this point I think we do it one honest loan at at time...defining the borrower benefit all along....
on
There is a lot of hype being given to recent reports on the housing market but unfortunately I don't think this is really the beginning of the housing market recovery...The housing market is being propped up with tax credits and other incentives...plus, as Charles Hugh Smith wrote today, "Beneath the hype that housing has bottomed is an ugly little scenario: lending standards are still loose and the low-down payment, high-risk loans being guaranteed by government agencies are setting up the next giant wave of defaults and foreclosures." The complete story is at: http://realestateconsumernews.com/financing/setting-up-the-next-leg-down-in-housing/
on
My point is that the government should induce stricter guidelines on borrower approvability. This is the most proactive approach in taming the beast. Yes, there were some really bad loans in the past, which are no longer available. The gov't is quick to lay blame to brokers selling products that the governemnt allowed. If the government legalized cocaine and a quarter of the population became addicted, who is to blame, the pharmacist or the government? Putting bandaids over problems of the past and using brokers as scapegoats will not help the problem. Its finger pointing and isolating us as bad guys. What about the huge institutions that bought and backed these loans? They get billions in bailout and we get the shaft. Sorry guys, Im still ranting!!!!
on

Nothing wrong with ranting. However, government implementing stricter guidelines--you really think they could come up with something valid given their track record of implementing and enforcing guidelines in the financial industry the past 10 years? Brokers are the easy target because as an industry we were completely egocentric and self assured about our survival, and as the bankers love to say--had no "skin in the game". Just because the government allowed "cocaine" like destructive programs to be sold, didnt' we have a fiduciary obligation to keep our customers out of them (as many of us did?) The finger pointing and isolating us as bad guys won't end until we educate consumers, media, and government about our future value. What future value you ask?: As an industry, we have an opportunity now to sell ourselves as the most transparent industry on the face of the earth. What other service or product discloses all of its profit up front, with tons of opportunities for the consumer to bail out of if they decide they're getting a bad deal. If we embrace all the changes rather than ranting about the unfairness perhaps we can use our new found environment of transparency to encourage the too big to fail banks, and behind closed door deal making politicians to follow OUR example of upfront full disclosure in all things financial. .