When it comes to mortgage fraud, the
chickens are still coming home to roost from the housing boom of the last
decade. The Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network (FinCen) reported Wednesday that 81 percent of the 29,558 mortgage loan
fraud suspicious activity reports (MLF SARS) it received in the second quarter
of 2011 involved activities that occurred prior to 2008 and 63 percent involved
activities that happened more than four years ago.
Reports filed in the second quarter were
nearly double the 15,727 MLF SARs filed by financial institutions during the second
quarter of 2010. The report tied that spike
to mortgage repurchase demands and special filings generated by several
institutions.
"We're continuing to see a large number of SARs filed on activity that
occurred more than two years ago, an indication that financial institutions are
uncovering fraud as they sift through defaulted mortgages," said FinCEN
Director James H. Freis, Jr. "But we also continue to see indications of
ongoing mortgage fraud activities. FinCEN's report released today raises
awareness of the common scams that homeowners and lenders may encounter when
arranging or modifying home financing."
MLF SARs represented 15 percent of all SARS
filings made by financial institutions during the quarter, an increase from a 9
percent share one year ago. Total SARS
filings increased to 203,468, a 16 percent increase from the second quarter of
2010.
Eighty percent of MLF SARs filings
reported suspicious activity amounts under $500,000. Only 12 percent of filings in the second
quarter reported loss amounts but those were also generally under $500,000.
California and Florida ranked first and
second among the states by volume of mortgage loan fraud subjects and also on a
per capital basis. Nevada and Illinois
ranked third and fourth on a per capita basis and New York and Illinois were in
those positions when ranked by volume.
Filings for MLF activities that occurred
within the previous year represented 11 percent of MLF SARs filings and more
than half of those (6 percent) were for activities occurring less than 90 days
prior to the reporting date. The most
common reported activity was misrepresentation of borrower income, occupancy
status, debts, or income, accounting for 30 percent of the most recent reported
activity. Nineteen percent of reports
involved debt elimination scams, 11 percent fraud through misuse of Social
Security numbers. Identity theft, short
sale fraud, and appraisal fraud each accounted for 4 to 6 percent of the
reports.
Debt elimination scams involved numerous
bogus documents and payment methods that customers and third parties submitted
to financial institutions in attempts to have their mortgage obligations
eliminated. Report filers described
several "payment methods" for mortgage debt elimination not seen previously including
fraudulent bank checks, falsely purported deposits from a Federal Reserve Bank,
and "international Bills of Exchange."
False statements and documents involved
misrepresentations of income, employment, occupancy, assets, and/or
liabilities. Some SARS described scams
in which the subjects made multiple loan applications for the same property
even though there had been numerous denials because of previous
misrepresentations.
While short sale fraud represented only
six percent of reports, there were many methods employed. There were frequent attempts to short sell
between related parties and short sale flips (in one case for less than half
the appraised value.) In one scam a
third party claiming to work with the bank contacted the borrower to say the
sale was being pulled then extracted over $50,000 from the borrower to continue
the sale. Other attempted or actual short
sale scams used fraudulent letters of credit, suspicious broker price opinions,
and fraudulent short sale approval letters.