Learn. Share. Connect. (60,832 Members)  - Join
 

Site Tools

Join Now or Sign In
for Full Access to All Features
Mortgage Rates
30 Yr FRM 4.36% -0.06%
15 Yr FRM 3.86% -0.04%
1 Yr ARM 3.52% -0.01%
5/1 Yr ARM 3.56% 0.00%
30 YR Tres 3.72% 0.07%
Fed Prime 3.25% 0.00%

Recent Video

Fed chief Ben Bernanke is testifying today before the...
CNBC's Steve Liesman sat down with outgoing Federal...
Receive Free Email Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news and blog posts with our free News Alert Service
 

FHA Ready to Reduce Seller Concessions. HUD Invites Industry Comment Before Implementation

by Jann Swanson on
 Email Page   |     Print   |     Bookmark   |   Tweet This - New!

HUD is preparing to implement a few new policies that will no doubt affect your pipeline/loan application process.

Last week, HUD and the FHA invited public comment on three of those policy changes, which are part of FHA's strategy to "strengthen their capital reserves".

The proposed changes which are either tweaks to other recent revisions or have been telegraphed by FHA and HUD in earlier Congressional testimony, notices to lenders, or press releases will:

  1. Update the combination of credit and down payment requirements for new borrowers
  2. Reduce allowable seller concessions from six to three percent.
  3. Tighten underwriting standards for manually underwritten loans

FHA has been scrambling to strengthen its financial situation since an audit late in 2009 showed that the capital ratio of its Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund (MMIF) had fallen below its statutorily mandated threshold.  In recent months the Administration has raised premiums on its FHA insurance, prohibited seller-financed down payment assistance, stepped up enforcement of its regulations, tightened appraisal rules, banned several lenders from writing FHA guaranteed loans and brought suit against others. READ MORE

In announcing the current revisions FHA said it is concerned with the issue of layering risk.  The chance of default is compounded in loans where there are low credit scores, high loan to value ratios, high debt-to-income ratios, and low or zero cash reserves associated with a loan.

Under the proposed requirements for credit and down payments, new borrowers will be required to have a minimum FICO score of 580 to qualify for the popular 3.5 percent down payment program.  Borrowers with lower scores will have to put up at least 10 percent down to qualify for FHA guaranteed financing and those with scores below 500 will not be eligible for FHA guarantees of any type.

FHA said that few borrowers will be affected by the change as lenders themselves have primarily used higher qualifying scores.  In 2009, approximately 93 percent of FHA loans had loan values above 90 percent, and less than 2 percent of those borrowers had credit scores below the proposed credit score threshold of 580.  Those borrowers in the higher LTV/lower FICO category, however, have proven to be unacceptable risks.  Borrowers with LTVs over 90 percent and scores under 580 have a delinquency rate of  30 percent while those in with LTVs up to 90 percent and with scores under 500 have a rate of 35 percent.  Loans given to borrowers above the proposed credit score floors have a rate of 7.63 percent.  Among the comments sought by FHA regarding the above changes is suggestions for acceptable score ranges for lenders using scoring models other than FICO

FHA is considering providing a temporary exception to the credit/down payment changes in the case of a borrower who is refinancing to reduce indebtedness under earlier changes announced by FHA.

FHA has required that seller concessions to borrowers in excess of six percent be treated as an inducement to purchase and that the FHA mortgage amount be reduced accordingly.  The new rule would reduce that allowed concession to 3 percent, with the permitted mortgage amount reduced dollar for dollar where concessions are given above that level.  FHA said that this will bring the rule in line with the guidelines of most conventional lenders.  FHA said it has found that borrowers who had been allowed to take concessions above 3 percent had a significantly higher risk of losing their homes.  For example, loans written in 2008 with no concessions had a claim rate against the FHA guarantee of 1 percent; seller concessions up to 3 percent had a rate of 1.2 percent while those loans with concessions above 3 percent had a claim rate of 1.7 percent.

The third proposed change outlines compensating factors which can be used by lenders to qualify loans that, largely because of a limited or nontraditional credit history on the part of the borrower, may need to be manually underwritten.  Under the change, lenders will be required to consider those factors which are the best predictive indicators of loan performance.

Acceptable compensating factors include:

  • A documented significant decrease or minimal change in housing expense coupled with a documented 12 month housing payment record with no more than one 30-day late payment.
  • Documented significant additional income that is not considered effective income.
  • Documented cash reserves of at least 3 monthly mortgage payments including principal, interest, taxes, and insurance.
  • Special "stretch" debt ratio provisions for Energy Efficient Mortgages.

The comment period ends on August 16, 2010. Here’s how you can provide feedback:

  1. Visit http://www.regulations.gov
  2. Scroll down about 1/3rd of the page and you will see a link for “What’s Hot –Most Visited Regulations”
  3. Click on that link and you will see a list of pending regulation. Select the notice:  “Federal Housing Administration Risk Management Initiatives:  Reduction of Seller Concessions…”
  4. That will take you to a page where the document outlining these changes is available for review.  Towards the top right-hand of the page, you will see a link in light-blue ink that reads “Submit Comment”…click on that link and fill-in your information, and type-in your comment.
  5. Hit “submit” and let your voice be heard.

Comments

Join Now or Login to Post Comments

on
Here we are with housing prices at the bottom and we are tightening the credit standards. Can any of these government morons figure out that if they loosen standards a little and stimulate housing, then the existing underwater loans become homes with equity incentivizing the owners to keep them instead of walking away. Also what ever happened to CRA. It is incredible how the very people who elected Obama, are the ones getting totally dumped on. Incredible how go to the extremes on both sides of this equation. SEC watching porn at the top and screwing the industry at the bottom. Does anyone have any common sense anymore?
on
Mike....sorry.....not gonna happen. One may argue that if you loosen underwriting standards you simply kick the can down the road for those bad credit risks to default at a later date. Maybe I am crazy, but 3.5% down financing at great rates for marginal borrower's is not too bad. If you want to pick an area where some change would be welcome it is for the guys with 30-40% down payments and solid credit who cannot get a loan right now based on income verification issues. If we want FHA to be around...some basic tweeks are a reasonable concession. It could have been much worse...
on
Here's the problem, as I see it, and have commeted to HUD. 3% if not a problem for these guys in the DC area that are buying a $500K home with FHA financing. What they areforgetting is that the not everyone buys a $500k home. How about the low income borrower buying an affordable home that FHA is supposed to exist for? I commonly see deals that are less than $100K. 3% won't cover fees and escrows. They effectively would be raising the down payment requirement for low cost homes. This would severely impact these low cost neighborhoods. Here's another thing. Wasn't one of their issues to increase cash reserves? Wouldn't this measurewe totally counter-productive in that regards? I think this could have a devestating impact on the first time buyer market which in turn will have a down stream impact on the move up buyer market. Their timing couldn't be worse.
on
Tighten credit guidelines a bit, and then force mortgage cramdowns, force banks to release their shadow inventory onto the market, make it illegal for banks to flip foreclosures between each other, (one bank shows a loss, reimbursed by the Govt, the other has a nice profit to show to its investors.) We have to force values down, keep rates low, and see the market recover, at least better then it is now.