Learn. Share. Connect. (54,654 Members)  - Join
 

Site Tools

Join Now or Sign In
for Full Access to All Features
Mortgage Rates
30 Yr FRM 5.01% 0.03%
15 Yr FRM 4.40% 0.01%
1 Yr ARM 4.22% -0.07%
5/1 Yr ARM 4.27% 0.02%
30 YR Tres 4.53% 0.04%
Fed Prime 3.25% 0.00%

Recent Video

President Obama is hosting Democratic and Republican...
A look at the health of the American consumer, with...
Receive Free Email Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news and blog posts with our free News Alert Service

HARP Guidelines Allow for 125% LTV. Originators Still Skeptical

by Adam Quinones on
 Email Page   |     Print   |     Bookmark

HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan today announced that the Federal Housing Finance Agency has authorized Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to raise the Home Affordable Refinance Program's (HARP) loan to value (LTV) ceiling from 105% to 125%.

The Home Affordable Refinance Program was designed to assist borrowers who have demonstrated an acceptable payment history on their existing Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac owned mortgage loan. Unfortunately due to rising unemployment levels and increasing foreclosure rates, demand for housing has weakened and property values have continued to decline, which has blocked many borrowers from utilizing HARP.

The expansion of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's LTV guideline aims to expand qualified homeowner's refinance opportunities. The underlying initiative is that lower monthly mortgage payments will raise real household incomes and therefore afford more spending power upon consumers. In a government press releases, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner stated...

"By expanding refinance eligibility, we can bring relief to more struggling homeowners more quickly. It's a crucial step in our broader efforts to get America's housing market and economy on the path to recovery."

Thus far the effectiveness of the HARP program has faced many barriers. Among these roadblocks: lenders adding underwriting overlays and guideline restrictions, lenders all together not participating in the program, difficulty determining if Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac own your mortgage because of addresses not exactly matching the original note, additional costs because of lender imposed risk based loan level price adjustments (on top of GSE LLPAs), the unwillingness of banks to subordinate second mortgages, reluctant mortgage insurers, and the Home Valuation Code of Conduct.

Kent Mikkola, a mortgage consultant from Roseville, Minnesota says "Overall, it is difficult to obtain a HARP approval. Furthermore,  it is even more difficult to find out why a seemingly eligible borrower has been denied"

Since the program was launched on April 1,2009 several updates have been made to counteract these roadblocks, however HARP remains unable to live up to the hype surrounding it. That said, today's announcement, although appreciated, was broadly overlooked by skeptical mortgage professionals. John Rodgers, president of Prime Mortgage Lending in Apex, North Carolina, had this to say:

"It appears that the Obama Administration is aware of the constraints blocking borrowers from lower mortgage payments. Unfortunately, today's update will likely prove ineffective in lowering those barriers. At this point granting appraisal waivers, allowing reduced documentation, and cutting loan level price adjusters appear to be the only way HARP will ever be effective. Otherwise HARP will turn out to be yet another loan program nobody can use, much like like FHA Secure and the Hope for Homeowners program."

Nonetheless, borrowers who are in trouble with their mortgage should find out if they are eligible for a refinance or loan modification. You can do so HERE

 


RESOURCES

Making Homes Affordable Homepage

Fannie Mae HARP Homepage

Fannie Mae Loan Look Up

Borrower FAQ

Lender FAQ

Fannie Mae Press Releases

Fannie Mae Loan Level Price Adjustments Table

Freddie Mac HARP Homepage

Freddic Mac Loan Look Up

Freddie Mac Information for Lenders

Freddie Mac Information for Borrowers


Comments

Join Now or Login to Post Comments

on
The real question is when do lenders begin to print paper on this program???
on
I could be wrong but I am assuming the 125% LTV will come at a cost. I had 2 appraisals done this spring, the second one came in 30 k less than the first and that brought our LTV >95% Fannie charges 1 point for > 95% .
on
I don't care the cost, to be honest. If lenders start endorsing this program it opens up an additonal avenue for business in an otherwise too strict market.
on
The costs are an issue. Freddie to freddie loans have restrictions on what can be rolled into the new loan. Also, with additional costs, consumers might be forced into premium pricing to cover those fees which will increase their mortgage rate and reducing or eliminating the benefit of refinancing. The biggest hurdle is the reluctance of 2nd lien lenders agreeing to the refinance by subordinating.
on
i agree with the cost comments,between llpas and appraisal issues,the industry is complicating the simple to the point where alot of work is done to determine that the borrower has no benefit.
on
I agree that cost is an issue. The point to expanding the LTV ratio to 125% is in hopes to reach more people but if there are going to be high costs involved than that could eliminate the benefit to refinance as well.
on
...though I understand the 'raise the Loan To Value to 125%' which is obvious, LTV been the front end; what will the CLTV, HCLTV and TLTV be...the back-enders? The same? 125% CLTV? Now, when the program first launched in April, one of the biggest selling points was the 110% but we soon found out that most lenders were unwilling to lend on that practice and some went as far as to ignore it all together while others lowered it to 95 on the front and 105 on the back. People, if properties have depreciated over 35% in some areas what will a 125 back end do especially with the turn times we're experiencing for re-subordinations? Better yet, HARP is a limited cash out program which means the only thing added to the outstanding balance is the closing cost which essentially defeats the whole purpose; how can you expect homeowners to have more discretionary income to boost the recovery and bottom out housing if you limit their savings to just $150.00 to $300.00 a month? Though that's something its really nothing! Make it a true program where borrowers who have demonstrated the ability to not only pay their mortgage on time but all their other debts consolidate ALL their debts should they choose and the LTV allowing into one monthly payment, in which case you can save a single household $1,000.00 to more than $2,500.00 a month in some cases. That's the real housing and economic boost. You can't say 110%, then 105% and then 125% and then guess what, you can't even include purchase money second...I think the whole thing's a wash...
on
I retract my earlier statement about the cost. Borrowing costs will definitely be an issue. I'll reserve my optimism until the full details of the program are layed out. The comments from everyone thus far indicate a lot of skepticsim as to whether this program can even truly benefit the borrower.
on
Re: Victor's comment about the hurdle still remaining with subordinating 2nd liens behind this new 125 program; I would imagince the CLTV is 125% no matter how you slice it - so subordination agreements will be a Non-issue over 125 regardless. Unless you do some crafty negotiating with the 2nd lien holder to short refi their principal by threatening Loan Mod if they don't allow your client to close the new 125 refi??
on
I would be able to help alot more borrowers if they enacted a law FORCING the subordinate lender to execute a subordination agreement under reasonable circumstances.