Congressman Elijah E. Cummings recently
introduced a bill that would create an independent monitor to oversee the
distribution of funds paid by mortgage services to borrowers to compensate for illegal
foreclosures and other abuses.
The bill, HR 1706, The Mortgage
Settlement Monitoring Act of 2013, was crafted by Cummings, Ranking Member of
the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, because of what he views
as a lack of transparency and accountability on the part of federal regulators,
banks and their servicing subsidiaries.
As background, in 2012 the Federal
Reserve and the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) ordered 14 banks to
begin individual case-by-case reviews (at the request of borrowers) of files
relating to alleged servicing abuses. At
issue were illegal foreclosures, modification problems, dual tracking of
remediation and foreclosures, improper fees and other violations. Thousands of reviews were requested and the
banks hired independent firms to conduct them.
After several months it became
apparent that the reviews were taking an inordinate amount of time and costing
huge amounts of money (the consultant firms were being paid as much as $250 per
hour). In February 2013 the regulators settled with 13 of the 14 banks for an aggregate
of $3.5 billion in cash to end the reviews.
The money was to be allocated to 4.2 million borrowers whose homes were
in any state of foreclosure in 2009 or 2010 and serviced by one of the 13 banks
or their subsidiaries regardless of whether or not they had requested a review.
Last month the Fed and OCC released a
payment schedule for benefits from 11 of the banks. Amounts to be paid were
based on a formula which appeared to set a value based on inconvenience and
financial loss and ranged from $300 to $125,000 per borrower. For example, where a servicer initiated a
foreclosure against a borrower who was performing all requirements of a written
trial-period modification plan and that foreclosure was rescinded the payment
would be $6,000; if completed, $50,000.
Most of the largest payments ($125,000)
are going to members of the military who were foreclosed despite protections
afforded them under federal law. Except
for benefits designated for military personnel, amounts are halved if the
borrower had not requested to be part of the original independent review. Information on benefit criteria, payment
amounts, and the numbers of borrowers affected can be reviewed here.
While there was some comment at the
time, largely in politically oriented media, about the seemingly paltry amounts
paid to many borrowers, especially those who lost their homes, the announcement
passed quietly. Payments started to roll
out on April 12 and to date $1.6 million in checks have been cashed or
NBC and MSNBC aired a report on the
payouts this morning and Cummings appeared on the latter to discuss it and his
bill. He blasted regulators,
particularly OCC, for accepting the settlement amount and for the methods used in
determining the criteria for the payouts, the amounts of the individual
payments, and for refusing to give Congress information on how these decisions
Cummings said he felt the settlement
amount had been set by how much the banks were willing to pay. They alone established the categories for
payment he said, and made the determination as to how borrowers fit into those
has been joined in his criticism about the settlement by Senator Elizabeth
Warren (D-MA), a member of the Senate Banking Committee and the two launched a joint investigation of
the settlement in January. At that time
they requested that the Fed and OCC provide documents relating to illegal
actions by mortgage servicers during the Independent Foreclosure Review. Both
agencies refused to provide these documents, arguing that they are the "trade
secrets" of mortgage servicers.
Cummings' bill would create an
Independent Monitor appointed by the President to review the compliance of all
parties to the settlement, both servicers and regulators, and issue quarterly
reports to Congress and the public. These reports must include:
A description of the criteria and
methodology used to determine eligibility for direct and indirect relief and a
description of due process protections for recipients;
Information on borrowers who receive
relief by mortgage servicer including demographic information, the level of
direct compensation for similarly situated borrowers, and the number and
amounts of principal reduction loan modifications and other types of borrower
Information on the credit given to
mortgage servicers for direct and indirect compensation provided to borrowers;
A list of instances in which
mortgage servicers or regulators fail to comply with the terms of the
settlement, and a list of actions taken by regulators to compel compliance.
"Mortgage servicers have now
admitted that they broke the law by illegally foreclosing on American families
and committing numerous other abuses, but regulators refuse to provide even the
most basic information about the extent of the abuses that were uncovered,"
said Cummings. "Since federal regulators now plan to rely on these same
banks to determine payouts and deliver settlement funds to borrowers, we need
an Independent Monitor to bring transparency and accountability to this