<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>2012 On Pace to be Record Year for Housing Affordability</title><link>http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/01092013_housing_affordability.asp</link><description>Even though home prices have been rising, the National Association of Realtors&amp;reg; (NAR) said today that 2012 appears primed to set a record for housing affordability . With 11 months of data in, NAR's Housing Affordability Index was at 198.2 in November</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP2 (Build: 31106.96)</generator><item><title>re: 2012 On Pace to be Record Year for Housing Affordability</title><link>http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/01092013_housing_affordability.asp#290747</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 06:19:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2bb7a989-b681-446d-a7f2-bd5f0562f228:290747</guid><dc:creator>Frank Ceizyk</dc:creator><description>I wish we could get more details of the &amp;quot;excessively tight underwriting&amp;quot; Mr. Yun mentions that is stopping buyers who have 20% to put down, and a 25% front debt ratio  from getting mortgages.  Anybody have a link? A list?  Mr. Thomas: What does a more sensible lending environment look like, and what would the NAR suggest as rules for Fannie and Freddie buybacks? 
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=290747" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>