Lenders Facing Repurchase Demands from Investors

re: Lenders Facing Repurchase Demands from Investors

Gail — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:34:44 GMT

This "situation" has created, for better or worse, a significant number of career opportunities in the mortgage repurchase area. Many of you seem to be knowledgeable about the desired requirements for these kinds of roles. I think to the extent that new jobs are being created for individuals who may be out of work through no fault of their own, any ideas as to how to tap into this talent pool?

RE:Lenders Facing Repurchase Demands from Investors

huh... — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:00:00 GMT

I think David A. Yablonsky Sr. is bringing up a good point.. beneath the cliches, metaphors and "look what I say" comentary... Bernanke has been left with quite a mess to clean up. Here's hoping that he stands up and becomes the hero we need in that position, otherwise it's more goernment dollars poorly spent. I for one do not envy his job

RE:Lenders Facing Repurchase Demands from Investors

David A. Yablonsky Sr. — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:00:00 GMT

This is the Chicken Little Syndrome at work. The biggest panic since 1929. Chicken Little is Ben Bernanke. The guy that hit him in the head is Alan Greenspan. Greenspan's Fed created the financial environment that allowed subprime lending in the first place, and then allowed it to run rampant by keeping interest rates artificially low. Everybody got on the big-profits bandwagon from borrower to standard & Poors. Then, when Greenspan (who is no dummy) foresaw that the subprime lending scheme was going to collapse, he left Bernanke holding the subprime bag. Ben, when he realized the position in which he had been placed and not realizing the impact his words as Fed Chief would have, panicked and started the ball rolling by pointing the finger at subprime lenders for virtually all of the world's financial ills. Had he played it closer to the vest, economic, legislative and legal forces would have handled the subprime dilemma without all of the hoopla. The good news is that the economy is like one of those new flexible garbage bags that hold stuff in, even if it's sharp. There are lots of items in the economic garbage bag and if the built-in legal and economic forces are allowed to settle things, the integrity of the bag will remain unbroken, even though there will be losers. Happiness is having things your way 51% of the time. If you are ALWAYS happy, you are either a winner or a moron. If you are NEVER happy, you are either a loser or a dyed-in-the-wool pessimist. When the pendulum swings, it's not what happens at either extreme that counts. If the pendulum stopped at either end of the swing, the clock would stop. It's what happens in between the extremes that counts. That's where I figure I'm at. Sometimes a winner, sometimes a loser but at least I'm not stopped in my tracks....

RE:Lenders Facing Repurchase Demands from Investors

noslen — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:00:00 GMT

if you're not sure, take out a fixed rate. I have yet to hear from a victim why they want an ARM program in the first place. bad credit? lower payment? house will go up 50% in 2 yrs? You chose to have an ARM mortgage loan where a regular fixed rate is also readily available. what's up with that?

RE:Lenders Facing Repurchase Demands from Investors

Anonymous — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:00:00 GMT

Mike, This may or may not get any attention, since the original publish date on this article was 5/28/2008, but the American legal process will argue with you otherwise on the "legality" of a contract and on people's Civil Rights. First, Correspondents, NOT brokers, buy back loans. These are two different animals in the lending world. Second, if there is something "inequitable" about current law, anyone has the right to (or try to) persuade a judge and/or a jury otherwise. Laws are challenged and changed everyday. New ways of looking and reading the law are why we have the American legal system. To continually test and "balance" the laws for the benefit of people's Civil Rights as brought to us by the Constitution of the United States.

RE:Lenders Facing Repurchase Demands from Investors

John — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:00:00 GMT

I have read over all these tyrants of finger pointing and the funny thing is, everyone wants to point the finger and blame the other person. Take accountability and quit blaming everyone else for your shortcomings. Home ownerships is not a right, it's earned. Yes, there will be booms and busts but please quit listening to the other guy that has the hot tip or the current flavor of the month to invest in. Use common sense. When you purchase a home, this should be the biggest decision of your life so dont take it for granted. READ THE DISCLOSURES. Why on earth would anyone take out an adjustable rate mortgage? 'I dont need to hear the pros and cons like all the used car selling brokers and realtors used in the last several years to make a buck so save your post. Again, take accountability and use your head. Blaming someone else is simply arrogant especially in this day and age when all your information is a click away, "GOOGLE". To sum it up, I can only give one piece of advice when it comes to home loans, fixed. Guess what, you know what the payment is and guess what, if the payment shocks you, re- adjust your thinking and buy a smaller home or move to a more affordable area. Sounds pretty easy doesn't it? Quit blaming everyone else, IE investors, lenders and brokers and take accountability.

RE:Lenders Facing Repurchase Demands from Investors

Douglas M. Thomson Sr. — Fri, 30 May 2008 11:00:00 GMT

When the loan was Originated the Loan Broker made false statements to Home Owners at the start of the loan application. Low 1-2% interest teaser rate payments looked great and the loan broker made the false promise that your payment would go down. When in fact the additional unpaid interest was added to the back of the loan. How can you build equity this way? The Loan Broker said that in 1-2 years the lender would let you refinance to a much lower interest rate. This was not true at all. The Broker made it sound as if your lender would agree to reduse your interest rate in 1-2 years. The fact is your lender does not have to do anything. The Loan Broker made a false promise, projecting equity growth and decreased interest rates during a time of inflated home values. Most Loan Brokers failed to mention the added unpaid interest may eat up any equity you may have achieved if any during this short period of time. If the lender was to go back to the meeting with the home owner and the loan broker they would hear over and over again this same false statements. The Loan Broker earned the highest commision knowing that in 1-2 years the lender would not agree to do anything. By this time the Loan Broker is gone with 2-3% of the home loan value paid to them in commisions. To add insult to injury. Now investors of are paying the price again as home values have dropped. Home owners owe more then the home is worth and many have walked away from their homes are worth, as a result of the increased mortgage payments due to higher interest charges and growing loan amounts. What do you do at this point? Damage control is the only solution. However the investors still don't have enough control over the loan servicing companies. As a result of these unqualified loan servicers delay and threaten home owners that they will start forclosure. Loan Servicers do not have the authority to initiate forclosure. Only the lender does after several months of failed attempts working with the home owners. Home Owners trying to get help can not make the high payment and the service company is now getting in the way of any real help. The Home Owner can not get the help they need so they walk away when they realize they can rent for less and can now buy the same home for 20-40% less then they now owe on their current home. Whats the solution you ask? The Lender instructs loan servicer to Freez interest rates at a 5% interest only payment to start with. Inform the Home Owner that they are very important to them and that they be able to remain in their home. Inform the Home Owner they will be contacted by a Loan Negotiator to help them modify their home loan so that they can afford to make their mortgage payment and stay in their home. If the lender is smart they will do everything in their power to cut their loss and still keep the home owner in their home. Even if this means lowering the interest rate and redusing the loan amount. After a qualified loan negotiator has looked at the home value, the home owner, and their ablility to pay. A modification can be made to insure the home owner stays in the home if at all possible. Not all home owners will meet the investor guide line. At this point then the Home Owner would be sent to the Consumer Credit Counsel for help.

RE:Lenders Facing Repurchase Demands from Investors

Miranda — Fri, 30 May 2008 11:00:00 GMT

It seems as though there is plenty of blame to go around. But when did investment not become about risk? Any investment carries risk especially bad investments. I feel worse for those victims who are losing their homes than for investors. I think that better financial education is needed in this country. More people need to be taught how to make better financial decisions.

RE:Lenders Facing Repurchase Demands from Investors

noslen — Thu, 29 May 2008 11:00:00 GMT

Pat: you're in your 60's, living on disability and take a cash out mortgage for about say $240k?

RE:Lenders Facing Repurchase Demands from Investors

Cindy — Thu, 29 May 2008 11:00:00 GMT

How can any one of you sit here and say that this mortgage mess is the borrowers fault because of bad decisions? The "bad decisions" from the borrowers came from the brokers and lenders in the first place. If they had not been so greedy with wanting so much money, it probably would have eliminated fraud and predatory lending to some degree anyway. Investors should have checked more thoroughly on what they were investing in. If they had, they would have found out a long time ago that there was fraud involved in most of the subprime loans. Justice is here, it just needs to be enforced and it is just a matter of time now that these people will loose their big time mortgage broker jobs or even go to jail for something that they knew was wrong in the first place. They all led borrowers down the paths to financial destruction so they could reap the big payoffs in the end and it is finally catching up with them. And, as for the 1%foreclosure, I do not know what planet you live on, but you need to wake up and smell the coffee!

RE:Lenders Facing Repurchase Demands from Investors

Dennis Anderson — Wed, 28 May 2008 11:00:00 GMT

As a Realtor, I have worked with the good, the bad, and the ugly! A few of the brokers were bottom feeders and bent or broke the rules to close the deal. Those are the ones that are quickly disappearing from the scene as the investors begin to require buy-backs. This will eventually clean things up, but it will also cause undue delays and rejections as more lenders over react and become too cautious.

RE:Lenders Facing Repurchase Demands from Investors

Jose M. — Wed, 28 May 2008 11:00:00 GMT

Those lenders that engaged in falsifying work and proof of funds documentation simply to provide a bad loan, have no business staying in that business. In fact, they should all be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Theyâ€™ve caused the break down in the economy that we are all experiencing today.

RE:Lenders Facing Repurchase Demands from Investors

anonymous — Wed, 28 May 2008 11:00:00 GMT

the best way to fix this housing problem,i believe that instead of foreclose and loose almost half of the mortgage and live the people homeless,banks should work with the homeowners to try to refy the loan to a rate and amount that the owner can pay for the time been instead of leaving those houses destroy and unsold and ruin the neighborhood with devaluation.

RE:Lenders Facing Repurchase Demands from Investors

Anonymous — Wed, 28 May 2008 11:00:00 GMT

Lenders made huge profits during the boom. If they don't have reserves to handle this, they will go out of business, the strong will remain strong and will make it through. As a mortgage broker, I am fully aware of the buy-back provision in each of my broker agreements and have been very careful to stay as far from fraud as possible. Some will go out of business because of buy-backs, but they deserve it. They (and the borrowers who took loans they can't afford) are part of the cause. Why should government or anyone else remove the consequences of their actions? Some people act 80% or 90% of homes are going into foreclosure - it's actually less than 1%!!! (http://realestate.msn.com/buying/articlenewhome.aspx?cp-documentid=340866) Life will go on...Even if some people (and lenders) have to pay consequences for bad decisions.

RE:Lenders Facing Repurchase Demands from Investors

David L. Skibowski — Wed, 28 May 2008 11:00:00 GMT

Anonymous, I'm sure everything in your world is fair. When people break the rules you foregive them and say that's OK. Maybe in your world that's the way things are, and I presume that's what you're teaching your kids, but let me tell you a plain hard truth, that's not the real world! There are laws and they should be followed. If the contract is good, abide by it. Greedy people are to blame for the situation, Borrowers to Brokers to Investors. If they broke the law they should pay.