Learn. Share. Connect. (52,297 Members)  - Join
 

Site Tools

Join Now or Sign In
for Full Access to All Features

About This Commentary

The goal of the Community Commentary channel is to provide analysis and perspective on events affecting the mortgage and housing industry from members of our community that work in the marketplace on a daily basis.

Submit an Article      Why Contribute?
 

Editorial Disclaimer: The opinions and views expressed here are those of the contributing authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher, editor or the editorial staff of Mortgage News Daily.

Better Mortgage Origination: Financial Planning and Home Ownership Go Hand in Hand

Posted
 Email Page (New!)   |     Print   |     Bookmark

I recently attended an event called the Fiscal Wake-Up Tour, featuring former U.S. Comptroller General David Walker, an individual who I’m convinced has the most realistic and rational view of the U.S. economy.  The event educates and informs people about the state of our country’s finances.  Suffice to say we’re not in good shape.  I highly recommend visiting their website where you can access easy to understand and simplified details of the U.S. budget, how we have created future debt obligations that are unsustainable and why we are on track to rocket past historical trends and create massive debt burdens and higher taxes for generations to come.

What I found interesting about the event was that all of the solutions that were offered, (none of which are easy or palatable), were dependent on making changes at the government level.  Simultaneously, the panel admitted that our leaders only address big issues when they become big problems and that the current political system makes it highly unlikely that politicians will do anything until things are seriously bad.

I believe the roadblock to change is that politicians either can’t or won’t fix the problem because Americans are increasingly dependant on the benefits and entitlements from which the politicians derive their power and use to control votes.  Consequently, Americans can’t help themselves from voting short-term to protect their self-interests at the expense of their long-term interests and values.

As a group, Americans have lost their power to force politicians to legislate long-term.  For millions of Americans, balancing the federal budget is second or third on the list, after making sure that what-ever benefit, entitlement or pet issue they want gets approved.  There in lies the problem.

Until such time as more Americans become self-reliant, and capable of weathering the effect of forcing politicians to make tough fiscal decisions, the expectation that politicians will act sooner, rather than later out of forced and painful necessity, is fantasy.  In short, until we empower Americans to be self reliant the politics in Washington will continue as-is and use every crisis as an opportunity to further the interests of individual politicians. 

The solution is to help Americans re-establish a “thrift” mentality whereby we stop living for today at the expense of tomorrow.  Expecting politicians to be fiscally prudent and plan for the future, when the majority of their constituents are not, is unrealistic.  It’s like expecting a drug dealer to stop selling drugs when all a drug dealer hears are voices of people needing what he is selling.
 
Change will come about when people don’t need what the government is offering.   The solution is to help Americans hang on to more of the money that comes to them and the good news is that mortgage originators are in a unique position to help.
 
Roughly 70% of Americans own a home.  Eighty percent of wealth in America is created through real estate (i.e. home ownership).  Clearly home ownership and wealth creation go hand-in-hand and a solution which brings together financial planning and homeownership makes sense.

One very attractive solution is for the mortgage origination and underwriting process to include a standardized method of blending homeownership and the process of getting a mortgage with a personal finance education and a long-term financial and homeownership plan.

A solution of this kind would involve adding additional components to the mortgage underwriting guidelines which would assess an individual’s financial foundation for the purpose of determining whether the mortgage strategy puts a Borrower in a MORE safe financial position or a LESS safe financial position.  The criterion for making this judgment would include measuring if the loan put the Borrower in a better position to manage finances on a day-to-day basis, whether the loan helped eliminate or stay debt free and if the loan created opportunities to save and invest for the future.    

In the coming months the mortgage industry will be introduced to such a program and will be given an opportunity to take a lead role in revitalizing the American Dream and ushering in the return of thrift in America.  Are you ready for change?

Article by: Jeff Wirsing
If I can help you in any way I am happy to give it a try.

Comments

Join Now or Login to Post Comments

on
Couldn't agree with you more--but I'd say take it one step further. Non profit organizations like CCCS (Consumer Credit Counseling) have budgeting and basic homebuying courses offered for free every month. What if we started taking our clients to these classes as a show of good faith and transparency about our intentions? What if we agreed to submit a preclosing HUD to CCCS HUD certified counselors prior to closing so they could "check our work". After all--we've got nothing to hide, right? Seem crazy? We're already living through the alternative: HVCC,MDIA, HERA, proposed YSP elimination... are aimed at protecting the consumers--but isn't that our fiduciary responsibility as financial mortgage professionals? And if we actually FINANCIALLY EDUCATE future generations of homebuyers/homeowners, how many more referrals and repeat clients will we have? The 2008 Presidential Council on Financial Literacy graded 40,000 students on their basical financial knowledge--and they got a 53%. Absent a generous bell curve that's a big fat Fail. Perhaps a financial literacy initiative born from the same industry that nearly "brought the system down" could be just what we need to restore trust in eyes of consumers, the media and the government. Maybe the mandate should be a "C" grade on the next financial literacy test in 2010? Or at least a C on the mortgage literacy section? Maybe the intelligent, ethical and inspired minds that have brought us MND have already built the platform and community needed to make that mandate a reality. Thanks for the great post, and the great point. These kinds of ideas can truly revolutionalize our industry.
on
I could not agree more with this post. We have an extraordinary opportunity to promote our skills and expertise as we work with our borrowers.
on
Every person financing anything over $10,000 ought to review a household budget that considers their NET income along with ALL household expenses to determine if they can afford the item they are buying in a monthly payment. In fact I would welcome a new form added to mortgage disclosures that was a real budget signed by all parties involved in the transaction: Loan Officer, Realtor and Customer... Everyone aware of the exact financial picture and what the buyer can afford. Along with a underwriting requirement that used NET income...
on
Thank you for the underwriting guideline suggestion - recently took my townhome off the market due to slow and lowball offers (way below negotiation and/or by unqualified buyers). I refinanced five years ago to a 15 year in order to build enough equity to meet 20% criteria to purchase a stand-alone home within five years. I've also put $25K into upgrades. I'm in no hurry to move, and can stay another 1-2 years. I would now like to go back to a 30 year - low monthly payment to get myself in a stronger buying position when I do move. Problem #1 - since it was recently listed, they won't even look at refinancing for another 6 months; #2 - 70%/30% new criteria - just out of my reach by about 6% - or if FHA, they charge huge upfront pre-paid insurance fee which also reduces the equity plus forcing you to pay PMI for longer period of time (double-dipping?); #3 - neighboring properties desperate to sell or bank short-selling lower and lower - pulling my market value with it. I can't sell it, can't refinance it in order to lease; or even consider rent/rent until market improves, can't get lower monthly payments. Each loan should be considered individually - strong buyers with good credit are being penalized. Very frustrating. Clearly the good buyers are tapped to pay off all of the debt incurred by the poor lending choices.
on
I know we (and other lenders I assume) have removed the requirement to wait after pulling it off the market. In addition, you mention 70/30 on condos? Are you referring to LTV? Even with condos 75% gets you a good deal and 80% isn't half bad either. I would guess you might have more opportunity then you think...