Mortgage News Home

Saturday May 17, 2008

Home Page   24,327 Active Members   Register Welcome, Guest    Sign In  

Home

Latest Headlines

Popular Stories

Bookmark Us

Reader Comments

SUBSCRIBE

SEARCH OUR SITE

RSS News

Mortgage Rates
  30 Yr Fix 6.01% -0.04%
  15 Yr Fix 5.60% 0.00%
  1 Yr ARM 5.18% -0.11%
  5/1 ARM 5.57% -0.10%
  30 Yr Tres 4.58% -0.06%
  Fed Prime 5.00% -0.25%
MND Features

- Wiki
- Video News
- Mortgage License Information
- Real Estate License Information
- Mortgage Content Syndication
- Mortgage Fraud
- Housing Bubble
News Archives

Submit A News Tip
or Story Idea
 

Free Subscription To News Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news with our free News Alert Service.


Mortgage Fraud In The News

13715 Views - Printer Friendly - Email This Story To A Friend
 
RSS COMMENTS(17) LINK HERE ADD NEWS TO YOUR WEBSITE

Mortgage fraud and mortgage lending practices have been in the news in the last few weeks as the U.S. District Court of appeals ruled on two controversial mortgage settlement charges and the FBI announced a striking increase in and a crackdown on mortgage related fraud.

And the bubble continues to float as the Commerce Department announces yet another month of strong new house sales.


Court Rules "Yes" and "No" in Wells Fargo Case.
September 10, 2004


The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (New York) split a decision regarding settlement charges in a class action suit brought on behalf of several borrowers against the holding company and several subsidiaries of Wells Fargo & Company.

The plaintiffs, in a suit originally decided in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, charged that Wells Fargo had levied excessive and unreasonable fees for settlement services and that it had also marked up fees charged the plaintiffs for services provided by third parties as part of the mortgage settlement process.

Specifically, the plaintiffs claimed that Wells Fargo overcharged for services required to be paid by borrowers as part of the underwriting or settlement process at rates many times the costs incurred, most particularly charges for analysis of the borrowers' ability to repay the loan so as to qualify it for resale on the secondary market. Such qualification was allegedly ascertained using software obtained from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae at a cost of $20 per loan underwritten. The plaintiffs claimed to have been charged up to 25 times that amount at settlement.

A second category of charges were termed by plaintiffs as "mark-ups" on required services performed by third parties. This would include appraisals, title examinations, and credit reports. It was alleged that Wells Forgo added a premium to charges for such services even though they performed no action that added value to those services. For example, a credit report which might cost $50 was charged to the borrower at $150 even though Wells Fargo had done nothing more than order such a report. The District Court found in favor of Wells Fargo on both issues.

The court based its decision largely on whether the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), in the absence of clear guidance in the statute (Real Estate Settlement and Procedures Act (RESPA), and in particular § 8(b) of that act, had authority to speak to these charges in its "Policy Statements" which sought to regulate such fees.

The Appeals Court upheld the District Court in the matter of "overcharges," finding that nothing in the language of the statute authorized courts to divide a "charge" into what they or some other..."entity deems to be its ‘reasonable'" and ‘unreasonable'" components." Nor did Congress empower HUD to determine such reasonable and unreasonable components. "Whatever its size, such a fee is ‘for' the services rendered by the institution and received by the borrower."

The 2nd District Appellate Court, however, reversed the District Court on the issue of "mark-ups." They found that a 1992 regulation issued by HUD stating that "A charge by a person for which no or nominal services are performed or for which duplicative fees are charged is an unearned fee and violates" RESPA § 8(b)" to be a response to an invitation by an (earlier) court for HUD to clarify its view on the matter. For this and several other reasons, the Court ruled that HUD's policy statements should be deferred to.

This decision may well set the stage for an eventual hearing in the Supreme Court about the legality of the "overcharges" and "mark-ups." In the meantime the case has been sent back to the District Court for further review. We will try to follow this, but you can read the entire decision at www.ca2.uscourts.gov; reference Kruse v Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Doc. # 03-7665.

THE FBI IS ON THE CASE.
September 17, 2004

On September 17, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) announced that mortgage fraud is running rampant in the United States, with reports of suspicious activity up three fold since 2001. The Bureau also trumpeted its progress in the largest nationwide crackdown in its history directed at persons and groups engaged in mortgage and allied fraud.

FBI Criminal Investigative Division's Assistant Director Chris Swecker stated that "Operation Continued Action reflects the FBI's..."effort to identify, target, disrupt, and dismantle…operations engaged in fraud schemes that target our nation's financial institutions." The FBI claims that, since the operation's inception in August, 2004 (sic), it has identified more than 245 subjects in 158 investigations resulting in more than 151 indictments, informations, and complaints filed to date.

* * * *

Mortgage fraud is a complex issue, one that has many facets. The most costly impact is on lending institutions, but there are many types of fraud and predatory lending practices that victimize individuals, even whole neighborhoods and communities. We will soon present a multi-part series of articles on mortgage fraud; what it is, federal and state programs to combat it, and how you can recognize it and protect your home, your finances, and your credit.


And the Beat Goes On
September 27, 2004

After a downward blip in July, new home sales resumed its seemingly endless climb in August, rising 9.4 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.18 million units. The annual adjusted rate in July was 1.08 million homes according to a monthly report issued Monday by the U.S. Department of Commerce.

The fast growing Southern and Western regions of the country led the pace with double-digit increases (12.6% and 19.5% respectively) but sales in the Northeast were also up by a more modest 6%. Sales in the Midwest slowed by 8.3%.

The average sales price nationwide was $267,000.

* * * *

Have a question or comment or maybe a topic you would like to see addressed in this space? Contact us. We welcome all submissions and will do our best to incorporate your suggestions, publish your comments, and either answer your questions or point you to a source that can.



Story Views: 13715 | Permalink

Story Tools



Email This Story To A Friend

Subscribe To News Alerts
 

Related Tags

Select a Tag for more information related to that Tag. (View All Tags)
 

Related Stories:
Mortgage Fraud and Predatory Lending Practices
Mortgage Fraud Part 2 - More Predatory Lending Practices
Mortgage Fraud Part 3 -Two More Predatory Lender Practices

Comments (17)

Post Comment Comments RSS


I am in need of an attorney in the Houston Tx area, for predatory Lending fraud. If anyone can help me find a good attorney, please post. It would be so appreciated.

Above Posted By: angel | Tue, 8 Jan 2008 22:19:28 EST

WOW!!!!! I've just come across a big scam what should I do?

Above Posted By: Anonymous | Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:10:48 EST

Everyone in the real estate industry, including the government and the media for failing to educate and bring to light the unforeseeable, should bear responsibility more so than the buyer for I would venture to say that the agents and loan officers were fully aware that those individuals that had access to subprime loans would not be able to afford those homes.

Above Posted By: Jose | Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:27:59 EST

Those individuals that were enticed into purchasing ridiculously priced properties simply because the money was available are now faced with the reality that they cannot sell those over priced property to avoid foreclosure. Now qualified buyers are suffering the consequences and are unable to purchase a primary residence to be owner occupied because they were pushed out of the market.

Above Posted By: Jose | Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:27:25 EST

As a result of the Subprime Lending, 5 year Interest Only Loans, ARM's and Stated Income Loans combined with the unscrupulous Real Estate Agents, Loan Officers and Real Estate Brokers that developed schemes to suddenly become Investors and flipped properties, the inventory of affordable existing housing was depleted. Hence the cost of existing properties in some instances doubled and tripled in price within a period of a year.

Above Posted By: Jose | Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:26:53 EST

I am involved in a recent investment mortgage scam. A man we've known since he was a teenager, now a broker, told us he would refi our home, reinvest our money and would make the house payments for us for 36 months and then refund the amounts in full that was taken out. He took $233,000 and now won't tell us where the money went. Our payments are now $4000 a month, were $1000 a month. We can't pay it. We live on Social Security. He also took all my daughter's equity of her home - $108,000.

Above Posted By: Anonymous | Sat, 11 Aug 2007 00:10:34 EST

I am in the mortgage business, I think the biggest predatory lending comes from builders given so many incentives, that people buy just to get money back and closing and then they cannot pay the mortgage. Now that is abusive.

Above Posted By: Adrian | Sun, 5 Aug 2007 03:02:35 EST

I am in the mortgage industry. I've seen borrowers who may have overstated their income, have been making interest only or minimum payments, (i.e. 1% start rate) and now that the loan is adjusting (& they can't refinance because stated won't get to 100% LTV, or the property has LOST VALUE) they're scurrying to find someone other then themselves to blame for what I call "predatory borrowing".

Above Posted By: Deb | Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:36:19 EST

Solution to predatory lending and the tsunami of foreclosures it has caused: 1. Homeowners sue the predatory lenders/brokers under the Truth-in-Lending statues. 2. Audit mortgage documents for Truth-in-Lending compliance on settlement, as soon as the mortgage docs are signed. Brokers/loan officers, seek to have your GFE audited for Truth-in-Lending compliance before closing, that will prevent your being swept up in the predatory lending law suit frenzy that's just warming up.

Above Posted By: Jim | Sat, 28 Jul 2007 20:01:55 EST

I am involved in a recent investment mortgage fraud scam. I was used as a straw borrower. I earn only 42K, however, a particular mortgage borker approved me for 917,000 in loans on my credit. It appears as though the loan officer, mortgage broker, title company, the perpertrators themselves all took second loan proceeds exceeding $190,000 and less that a year later the loans are moving toward foreclosure, taxes unpaid. I reported it to the FBI and other Texas agencies.

I believe that many other persons are involved. I was able to get an attorney and we are dealing with the situation on a day to day basis.

Above Posted By: Michael | Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:28:46 EST

I know this guy that works for ********* Mortgage as a loan officer that is a total fraud. He has used an alias to gain two properties. This mortgage fraud must be stopped.

Above Posted By: Anonymous | Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:37:03 EST

I've been finding it increasingly difficult to compete with all of the fraud and misrepresentation in the marketplace. Most people don't want to hear the truth. People seem to believe the guy who is telling them what they want to hear regardless of the facts. I know loan officers that take 20-30 applications a month but only fund 8-10. That's a lot of people not getting what they were promised and guess who's taking home the fatter paycheck.

Above Posted By: Anonymous | Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:55:52 EST

In response to the post from anonymous on oct 23...Well put! I have been in the industry for long enough to hear of a lot of borrowers participating in fraud, even lying to their loan officer and giving them fraudulent info and docs. They are only hurting themselves by lying.

Above Posted By: anonymous | Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:13:49 EST

I am an honest mortgage broker and it has become tough to compete with fraud. While I feel for the buyers who are really victims I must reserve comment on most. The majority I have been in contact with were aware they were participating in fraud but don't want to be accountable for their decision to participate. I still try to help these people but they usually aren't happy with the terms they really deserve, which is what got them in their mess in the first place.

Above Posted By: anonymous | Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:52:28 EST

I am reading about subprime lenders and the reason they are SP lenders. I am a single black women with a credit score that was in the high 600's and now I found that I could have quailified for a prime loan. I 'm in foreclosure because the Lender, Mortgage Broker, Title Company, and the apprasier were a one-stop-shop for fraud. But it is said Mortgage Fraud is rampant and I am one of many victims across this Country, Just look at ripoff.com. I met my neighbor today he's a victim too. Now what?

Above Posted By: Anonymous | Sun, 15 Oct 2006 13:56:22 EST

It is a shame that some mortgage brokers do fraudulent activity because then we all look like used car salesmen. They ruin it for the brokers that are actually trying to put people in better financial positions but because the last person they dealt with put them in a two piece we all have a target on us. thanks.

Above Posted By: john | Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:37:10 EST

I am in the mortgage industry and was supposed to do a purchase loan for a client for a condo conversion. He informed me that the seller was only allowing them to go through ***** ***** because they were calling the condos a new construction, so they could get around the occupancy percentage. This sounded fishy. Is this legal? The condos were built in the 1970's and were subsidized housing until now. They are not new construction.

Above Posted By: Liz | Tue, 4 Apr 2006 11:47:02 EST


Post A Comment

Please fill out the form below to submit a comment.

Name: 
(Required - Type Anonymous or Use First Name Only if Private)
Email Address: 
(Not Required So No Fake Emails Please.)
URL or Weblog:
(Leave Blank If You Don't Have One - Use http://)
Comments: 
(Please keep comments on topic. No HTML Allowed. No Advertisng.)
Please Note: Due to Comment Spam, all comments are reviewed by hand. Most comments will appear shortly after submission but it may take up to 12 hours to appear. If you would like to come back, click here to Bookmark the page.
PLEASE DO NOT USE ALL CAPS


Character Count =     (5000 Character Limit)

If you would like to leave a longer comment, please submit your comments in 5000 character increments and we will merge your comments.
Notify me via email when my comment is approved.


Note: Please don't bother spamming. All submissions are reviewed by our our editorial staff. Comment spam and irrelevant links will not be approved.

 



NEW VIDEO
A New Civil War in Banking
Atlanta Fed President on Banking


Reader Comments (More)
The legislation powers are barking up the wrong tree. It comes about as to why people are using their home equity values instead o...
Read
With the many inaccuracies on credit reports and the strict credit score guidelines the lenders impose, I would think that the cre...
Read
What is accomplished here? Does the Fed's think those with poorer credit management should be given the same options as an excelle...
Read
Home - Contact - Sitemap - Disclaimer - Privacy Statement - Advertising
All Content Copyright © 2003 - 2008 Brown House Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form without the express written permission of MortgageNewsDaily.com is prohibited.