Learn. Share. Connect. (54,654 Members)  - Join
 

Site Tools

Join Now or Sign In
for Full Access to All Features
Mortgage Rates
30 Yr FRM 5.01% 0.03%
15 Yr FRM 4.40% 0.01%
1 Yr ARM 4.22% -0.07%
5/1 Yr ARM 4.27% 0.02%
30 YR Tres 4.55% 0.05%
Fed Prime 3.25% 0.00%

Recent Video

President Obama is hosting Democratic and Republican...
A look at the health of the American consumer, with...
Receive Free Email Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news and blog posts with our free News Alert Service

Another Dramatic Downturn in Mortgage Rates

by Glenn Setzer on
 Email Page   |     Print   |     Bookmark

Even before the Federal Reserve's half point rate cut on Tuesday Freddie Mac's Primary Mortgage Market Survey showed another dramatic downturn in both long and short term interest rates for conventional mortgages.

The Federal Funds, the rate impacted by the Federal Reserve's action on Tuesday actually has no direct relation to Treasury rates which tend to determine mortgage interest. Still there is a synchronicity between the two and it is likely that interest rates will come down further next week and, given the mid-week dates of the Freddie Mac and Mortgage Bankers Association Survey, probably the week after that.

According to Freddie Mac, the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) averaged 6.31 percent with an average of 0.5 point for the previous week. This was 15 basis points lower than the average for the previous week when fees and points were also an average of 0.5 point. This is the lowest rate since the week ended May 17 when the average was 6.21 with 0.04 point. One year ago the 30-year averaged 6.43 percent.

The 15-year FRM carried an average interest rate of 5.97 percent with 0.4 point, down from 6.15 percent with 0.5 point during the week ended September 6. This is, again, the lowest rate since May 17 when the 15-year averaged 5.92 percent. One year ago the average was 6.11 percent.

Five-year Treasury-indexed hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) had an average contract interest rate of 6.27 percent with 0.6 point. After the recent sudden spike in short term rates the average last week was 6.32 percent also with 0.6 point. One year ago the rate was 6.10 percent.

One-year Treasury-indexed ARMS were down 12 basis points from the 5.74 percent average a week ago. Fees and points, however, jumped from 0.6 to 0.8 for this product.

"Interest rates on prime conforming loans fell across the board in the past week, with rates on 30-year fixed mortgages averaging 0.15 percentage points below the previous week's level", said Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac vice president and chief economist. "The drop in mortgage rates may give some relief to borrowers who are looking to refinance or purchase a home.

"As a matter of fact, all the mortgage products in Freddie Mac's survey this week were lower than they were at the same time last year."
The Mortgage Bankers Association had less good news for borrowers from its Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ended September 14.

The MBA reported that all rates were up even if only slightly for the week. The 30-year FRM, for example, increased to 6.29 percent from 6.25 percent with points including the origination fee going from 1.0 to 1.02.

15-year FRMs had an average contract interest rate of 5.99 percent compared to 5.90 percent the previous week with fees and points increasing from 1.03 to 1.09.

The interest rate for one-year ARMS increased 5 basis points to 6.39 percent with points nudging up from 0.93 to 0.95.

Mortgage activity was up 2.4 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from the previous week which was shortened by the Labor Day Holiday. However, on an unadjusted basis it rose 25.6 percent and was up 12.8 percent compared to the same week in 2006.

Refinances as a share of total mortgage activity increased from 42.1 percent to 43.5 percent while the ARM share of mortgage applications dropped once again from 13.2 percent to 12.6 percent.


Comments

Join Now or Login to Post Comments

Mike Wolpin
on
This will have absolutely no affect on the real challeges for middle american consumers. A. Home prices in growth areas are grossly over inflated and equity is artificial. B. Underwriting criterion restricts qualification. C. Average people can't afford houses. D. Average people are loosing their homes in foreclosure. E. Average people whom have lost their homes due to sub prime and adjustable loans, no longer have good credit. F. Average people don't qualify to be renters.
Chris
on
When will the media "Get It" that a cut in short term rates does not mean a cut in long term rates, and generally the opposite? Long term rates follow the bond market generally, when the Fed cuts short termm rates it rallies the stocks, which means bond yields (and long term rates) increase. I have had about half a dozen people call thus week asking how low mortgage rates went...and for the most part they have increased.
Anony
on
Rate, rates , rates...the problem is not with rates. There are no programs. Loan requirements are so strict that no one qualifies for the loan... Homes are appraising for less then the purchase price from a year ago and the minimum credit score requirement has gone up to over what the average american has. If you don't have 10%down or in equity, and a 680 score...forget it. IT IS ALL ABOUT THE PROGRAMS.
Anonymous
on
People entered creative financing schemes like the 3-1 ARM with hopes that housing prices would continue to rise, and that they would be able to cash in, at someones else's expense, before their mortgages went up. These people were greedy and irresponsible, and don't deserve any pity. We should stop painting these foreclosure casualties as "victims." Because of them, responsible home buyers must now pay the price in this difficult lending market.
Chris
on
About 8 years ago underwriting guidelines starting relaxing to the point that as long as you had good credit the ability to pay didn't matter. Then on top of that, you start lowering the credit standards on borrowers that clearly cannot afford the home. The guidelines were relaxed only to the point of what the investor would buy. While home values were increasing and the borrower got in trouble, he could just sell. Now everyone knows that is not so easy, if not impossible. But wait a minute...if I know I make $5000 a month and can only afford a $1500 house payment, I don't buy a home that will cost me $3000 a month. Like I wouldn't buy a Mercedez Benz if my range is more Ford Escort. People have to be responsible for their own decisions. I am losing money on my 401K, should I say "who can I blame" or "who can bail me out?"