Mortgage News Home

Tuesday October 7, 2008

Home Page   28,684 Active Members   Register Welcome, Guest    Sign In  

Home

Latest Headlines

Popular Stories

Bookmark Us

Reader Comments

SUBSCRIBE

SEARCH OUR SITE

RSS News

Mortgage Rates
  30 Yr Fix 6.10% 0.01%
  15 Yr Fix 5.78% 0.01%
  1 Yr ARM 5.12% -0.04%
  5/1 ARM 6.00% -0.02%
  30 Yr Tres 4.31% 0.15%
  Fed Prime 5.00% -0.25%
MND Features

- Wiki
- Video News
- Mortgage License Information
- Real Estate License Information
- Mortgage Content Syndication
- Mortgage Fraud
- Housing Bubble
News Archives

Submit A News Tip
or Story Idea
 

Free Subscription To News Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news with our free News Alert Service.


So Should You Pay PMI or Take Out a Piggyback Mortgage?

21780 Views - Printer Friendly - Email This Story To A Friend
 
RSS COMMENTS(12) LINK HERE ADD NEWS TO YOUR WEBSITE

If you are buying a house with only enough cash to put five or ten percent down, what is the better deal, private mortgage insurance or a piggyback mortgage?

The numbers say piggybacks, not by a large margin, at least at the present time, but still enough difference to make the idea of a blended situation appealing. Higher interest rates could tilt things in favor of PMI as could the enactment of proposed regulations that will allow PMI premiums to be deductible in the same manner as mortgage interest rates.


We looked at two scenarios based on current conditions. Our first example is the purchase of a $200,000 house with a 10 percent down payment and a mortgage of $180,000 at 5.5 percent. The monthly payment on the mortgage would be $1,022 (principal and interest) and the PMI premium based on information from mtgprofessor.com, would be $78.00 (at 0.52 of the mortgage loan) for a total payment of $1,100.

The second scenario is based on the same purchase, but this time using a piggyback loan to supplement the borrower's down payment. Under this scenario, the first mortgage will be reduced to $160,000 (80 percent LTV), there will be no PMI required, and the piggyback second mortgage will be in the amount of $20,000 at 8 percent. The first mortgage payment will be 908.00 and the payment on the second, a 15 year loan, will be $191.00, $133 of which is tax deductible interest. The total payment will thus be $1,099 - $1 less than the combined first mortgage payment and PMI premium in the first scenario. So, at this point we have cash savings of $1 per month plus whatever the tax advantage is from the deductibility of second mortgage interest; an advantage that, should the above referenced legislation pass Congress, might disappear.

At the end of five years the borrower in Scenario One will have accrued $13,571 in equity payments (assuming no appreciation in house value) and will have a first mortgage balance of $166,429 for total equity of $33,571. Note that this is not enough to allow the borrower to get rid of the private mortgage insurance. The borrower in scenario two will owe $163.689; $15,753 on the second mortgage and $147,936 on the first for total equity of $36,311. Score one for piggy backs.

During these five years, PMI payments will have totaled $4,680, not a cent of which has contributed to the borrower's financial well being or sense of security, and at this point those payments have returned no tax benefits.

Some private mortgage insurance companies have recently been emphasizing the risk of piggyback mortgages. That may be true from the lenders' standpoint but probably not from the borrowers. As shown above, the difference in payment between carrying a first and PMI or a first and a piggyback second is, with current interest rates, usually negligible. If a borrower can afford one, he can probably afford the other.

Lenders have the assurance of extra collateral in the case of a piggy back which offsets, at least in part, the security of PMI. This extra security, however, may disappear in a declining market, leaving the lender with exposure in the case of a foreclosure. A lender will probably view PMI as providing a greater chance of full recovery, especially in a declining market. From a borrower's perspective, a foreclosure is a foreclosure; PMI, piggyback, either way a foreclosure will cost them their home and their credit rating.

As a risk factor, the piggy back presents the most exposure to the second mortgagee which will probably see its collateral and any chance of recovery wiped out in a foreclosure. Yet these lenders seem very anxious to assume this risk.

As stated earlier, if you are in an area of rapidly increasing home prices then that also must be factored in. Will you be able to document your home value and ditch PMI in a few years? If so that may be a better solution than a second mortgage that will stay with you for ten or 15 years. Remember, you can't count on refinancing the first and second mortgages as your equity increases; rising interest rates may eliminate that possibility.

If you are confronted with the decision between piggyback and PMI you should evaluate your choices carefully. Talk to your loan officer about your options. Run the numbers on each and every option. Ask yourself how long you will stay in the house; if the combined first and second mortgage payments or the first mortgage payment plus PMI premiums are manageable under your current financial situation (just because your loan officer says you can afford them doesn't mean you really can), and how much wiggle room you have should your financial situation suddenly change. Finally, how much real difference does the tax deductibility of a second mortgage make to your bottom line?



Story Views: 21780 | Permalink

Story Tools



Email This Story To A Friend

Subscribe To News Alerts
 

Related Tags

Select a Tag for more information related to that Tag. (View All Tags)
 

 

Comments (12)

Post Comment Comments RSS


should i double my piggyback loan on my 80/20 mortgage,or just pay the regular payment.

Above Posted By: tom | Sun, 26 Aug 2007 14:59:25 EST

My mortage loan was 339000 and my PMI is 400 monthly. Is this high or average for the loan amount?

Above Posted By: Mark | Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:21:30 EST

This 2007 PMI is already tax deductible but not sure if in 2008 it will be the same. Is PMI better than 80-20 if it's tax deductible as well? Thanks!

Above Posted By: Ronnie | Sat, 14 Apr 2007 09:51:00 EST

Is it true that with the 80-20, if you're paying the 20 you can pay the interest and cut a check for the principal separately little by little so that later on the principal & interest will get lower? Our plan is to stay 3-5 years in our 1st home then have someone rent it or sell it and then buy new one. Help! Thanks!

Above Posted By: Maria | Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:48:10 EST

Now that the PMI is tax deductible for 2007 is it better to take than the piggyback loan? My husband and I are going to buy our 1st home and we are confused whether to get the PMI or the 80-20. Esp when it gets to building the equity on the home.

Above Posted By: Maria | Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:47:59 EST

So is PMI better now that it will have the same tax advantages as interest?

Above Posted By: Anonymous | Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:15:24 EST

Most importantly PMI is determined by loan program that borrower qualifies for. PMI that is much higher as much as double or triple the amount stated in this scenario, for as many as 50% of borrowers. Further more any lender that can offer 5.5% on a fixed loan (no lender can) would definitely be in the 6's for a second making this scenario very unlikely. 5.5 +8%? More like 6.625+ 8% or 5.5 + 6.2%

In total PMI makes no financial sense, and the likelihood that any person would continue on in the same mortgage for 5 years +, considering current American trends, is not high. Considering that most Americans stay in their homes for 5 years and the avarage turn time on a mortgage is between 3 and 5 years depending on the area.

Above Posted By: Lender | Wed, 3 May 2006 12:26:15 EST

If in theory it would take 7 years to pay back enough of your home loan to remove PMI, wouldn't it also be fair to say that rates will go both up and down during that time. The chances then are VERY good considering the current rate market (6.5-7% on a 30 year) that rates will actually fall lower then they are today at some point during the next 84monts. IF this is true, the borrower then refinances the two loans together they will blend the rates into a significantly lower interest rate.

As far as the tax benefit posted on 4/9 the benefits are actually better in the 80/10 because 100% of finance charges are tax deductible where in the 90% situation $78.00 is not.

Continued....

Above Posted By: Lender | Wed, 3 May 2006 12:24:49 EST

The tax benefit would actually be the same with either option, the pmi loan simply doesn't give you additional tax benefit. The premiums are not deductible, but the underlying loan amount is the same as with the piggyback and therefore gives the same tax benefit.

Above Posted By: John | Sun, 9 Apr 2006 20:29:12 EST

Forgive the comment from the second post, the reader obviously is not in the mortgage industry and does not understand that the second senerio clearly points out a first mortgage of $160K and a second mortgage of $20K. In the lending industry this is known as an 8010 and equals 90% of the value of the home.

Above Posted By: Anonymous | Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:20:35 EST

Your two examples that compare monthly payments neglects to address the fact that in scenario #1 your payment is for the financing of only 90% of the purchase price, while in scenario #2 the payment is obviously to finance 100% of the purchase price. In order to truly compare the two scenarios, you would have to consider all of the implications of what you do with the $20,000 that you don't use as a down-payment (e.g. earned interest, tax ramifications, etc.)

Above Posted By: Anonymous | Fri, 7 Oct 2005 01:06:24 EST

You should consider the cost of removing the second mortgage vs. the PMI. With appreciation the PMI can be eliminated with little more than an appraisal. Without appreciation it will typically come off around 7 years. To get the second off at 7 years the borrower has to refinance the loans or pay a higher bleneded rate until the second is paid off. It would also be interesting to look at an analysis of lender paid mortgage insurance where the pmi is financed in the rate.

Above Posted By: Anonymous | Thu, 22 Sep 2005 08:34:29 EST


Post A Comment

Please fill out the form below to submit a comment.

Name: 
(Required - Type Anonymous or Use First Name Only if Private)
Email Address: 
(Not Required So No Fake Emails Please.)
URL or Weblog:
(Leave Blank If You Don't Have One - Use http://)
Comments: 
(Please keep comments on topic. No HTML Allowed. No Advertisng.)
Please Note: Due to Comment Spam, all comments are reviewed by hand. Most comments will appear shortly after submission but it may take up to 12 hours to appear. If you would like to come back, click here to Bookmark the page.
PLEASE DO NOT USE ALL CAPS


Character Count =     (5000 Character Limit)

If you would like to leave a longer comment, please submit your comments in 5000 character increments and we will merge your comments.
Notify me via email when my comment is approved.


Note: Please don't bother spamming. All submissions are reviewed by our our editorial staff. Comment spam and irrelevant links will not be approved.

 




NEW VIDEO
(5 New Today)
NEW! 0% Interest Rates -- The Answer?
NEW! Ackman on Short Selling


Reader Comments (More)
As Realtor I applaud the move to stabilize markets and confidence as this affects my livelihood but will this just bail out banks ...
Read
It seems to me that possibly the people with Freddie Mac finally admit there is a problem of a legal nature with most "sub-prime" ...
Read
What is truly disgusting and aggravating is the fact that most of the professionals in the mortgage and real estate industry obvio...
Read
Home - Contact - Sitemap - Disclaimer - Privacy Statement - Advertising
All Content Copyright © 2003 - 2008 Brown House Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form without the express written permission of MortgageNewsDaily.com is prohibited.