Learn. Share. Connect. (51,917 Members)  - Join
 


Site Tools

Join Now or Sign In
for Full Access to All Features
Mortgage Rates
30 Yr FRM 4.98% -0.05%
15 Yr FRM 4.40% -0.06%
1 Yr ARM 4.47% -0.10%
5/1 Yr ARM 4.35% -0.07%
30 YR Tres 4.40% -0.01%
Fed Prime 3.25% 0.00%
Receive Free Email Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news and blog posts with our free News Alert Service

Mortgage Rates Reset Shock Is The Latest Worry In Mortgage Markets

by Glenn Setzer on
 Email Page (New!)   |     Print   |     Bookmark

ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, has just issued the results or a large scale study of the potential impact of upcoming adjustments to adjustable rate mortgages. ACORN bills itself as the nation's largest community organization of low and moderate-income families. It advocates for better housing, more investment by banks and government in lower-income communities, and better schools.

The study used a sample of 275 subsidiary lenders owned by 15 of the largest lenders in the country. These lenders represent 65.5 percent of all residential mortgages that were originated in 2005 and 55 percent of the sub-prime market. Each of the lenders was asked to provide the public version of data they collected as mandated by the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) which includes information on the race, gender, and census tract of each applicant and whether the applicants received high-cost loans (those with an Annual Percentage Rate or APR 3 percent or more above the rate on comparable U.S. Treasury securities) or a sub-prime loan.

The study examined only first lien conventional purchase and refinance mortgages; no government guaranteed (i.e. VA or FHA) loans. 130 metropolitan areas were examined to determine the disparities between borrowers of different race and income levels to identify those areas and groups that may pose the greatest risk of "rate shock."

ACORN noted that, while ARMs represent about 24 percent of all home loans nationally, in some communities and among some demographic groups they account for a much larger percentage of the mortgage pool. ARMS also make up about 75 percent of all sub-prime loans, a 50 percent increase since 1999.

The report stated that "until this year there has been little recognition of the prevalence of adjustable interest rates in sub-prime loans and the danger posed by these ARMS." The focus instead has been on predatory practices such as excessive fees, high interest rates, and balloon payments.

Sub-prime loans are generally tailored for a market where people cannot obtain a conventional loan at a standard rate but Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae have estimated that at least one-third of sub-prime borrowers could actually have qualified for a lower cost mortgage so, it would seem that a "large number of the borrowers who have received ARMS should not have been in the sub-prime market."

The ACORN study found 32 markets where at least one out of three loans given out was high cost and thus subject to rate reset shock. In ten of these markets high cost loans represented two-fifths of the home purchase and refinance mortgages. The ten were Detroit and Flint Michigan; Memphis, Tennessee; Jackson, Mississippi; McAllen, El Paso, Laredo, and Brownsville, Texas; Springfield, Illinois; and Birmingham, Alabama.

ACORN also found that minority neighborhoods are at a great risk of payment shock because of the extent of high cost loans. More than half of the high-cost refinance loans in 67 of the areas examined in the study were in minority communities and in 44 of these areas over 50 percent of the purchase loans were high cost.

And the risk was not limited to the low income in minority areas. Upper-income minority borrowers were found to be at greater risk than white borrowers of similar income. In 12 metropolitan areas upper-income African-Americans were at least three times more likely than their white counterparts to receive high-cost refinance loans and in 15 metropolitan areas upper-income African-Americans were at least five times more likely to receive a high-cost purchase loan than upper-income whites. These areas are mostly southern or east coast (Atlanta, Baltimore, Charleston, Durham, Jackson, NYC, Washington, DC; but Milwaukee and San Francisco were included in the mix.

The ACORN report cited the phenomenon of "layered risk" where high cost loans are layered with multiple features such as interest only requirements, prepayment penalties, option payments where the borrower can choose each month whether to make a payment that will amortize the loan, pay interest only or make a minimum amount that will add interest on to the principal due. Such layering has the potential of increasing rate shock. Lenders are also offering low initial "teaser" rates which adjust to higher rates after the initial "introductory" period. In the latter case payments are nearly guaranteed to increase even if interest rates in general do not.

Interest rates for sub-prime ARMs are usually tied to the London Inter-Bank Offer Rate (LIBOR) with a margin of about 5.5 percent added on. The LIBOR has increased from 1.21 percent in January 2004 to 5.64 percent in June 2006. While many ARMs have rate caps that limit the amount that a rate can adjust on each anniversary and over the life of the loan, many sub-prime loans do not - or else have caps that allow very large increases. Even a typical 2 percent cap on a $150,000 loan would allow an increase in the monthly payment of $212.

The study quoted a Federal Reserve report that found an estimated 35 percent of ARM borrowers did not understand the maximum amount their rate could rise at one time or even how to calculate what the maximum rate would be. Another survey by Public Opinion Strategies found that lower-income people did not think that traditional mortgages were an option for them and we also less informed about reset shock and the debt risks.

Borrowers with prepayment penalties and minimum equity may be unable to refinance out of a loan that, once it readjusts, they can no longer afford. The study quotes research by First American Real Estate Solutions that up to 1 million households are in danger of losing their homes through foreclosure aver the next five years because they will not be able to afford new payment levels and will owe more on their homes than they can recoup through a sale or refinance. The ACORN report indicates that the impact of rate reset shock may be concentrated in certain metropolitan areas, neighborhoods, and among certain demographic groups. This might possibly magnify the impact as forced sales and foreclosures flood the market and further drive down prices.


Comments

Join Now or Login to Post Comments

Kathy
on
Home ownership is a privelege not a right. The government should stop forcing lenders to create programs designed to attract low income families, or families with very bad credit that shows a long history of non-payment. Some people just aren't ready to own homes. And with 100% financing, the borrowers have no investment to protect. If times get tough, it's easy to walk. The foreclosures have only just begun!
T J
on
If you have an ARM that will or has increased your monthly payment,you are not alone. Don't panic, shop around for a fixed price Mortgage, contact your current lender and ask to refinance through them as well they will usually wave the prepayment penalties if you have them. Don't be late on any Mortgage payments, it's one of the first things most lenders will look at. Also if they run a credit report on you, get a copy of it for yourself. A good FICO will help you negotiate a good loan.
Tim
on
As a Mortgage Professional for many years I have seen multiple changes in the lending industry and been on several sides of it. While many loans do not seem to be "priced" correctly they are all done at a lenders risk. As long as someone wants a home there will be a lender, no one is forced to close a loan....they can keep paying rent and never own a home. Compare now to 10 yrs ago and look at own vs. rent stats. Bad Credit=Risk=Cost, as with any business. My 2 cents.
Anonymous
on
I am a single mother who came to the US 5 years ago. I thought that my dream came true when a year ago I bought a condo in the Washington, DC area on my own, with no money down. I worked hard to build my credit to get a loan. So I got 80/20 split to 5/1 ARM fixed and adjustable rate mortgage tailored to the prime rate. Now I am in for foreclosure/bankruptcy in 4 years when my ARM will adjust and I will have no equity to refinance the loan.
Anonymous
on
My American dream was to own a home which I did. But being a first time buyer a fell prey to these Lenders who are just out there looking to make good money out of hidden fees and prepayment penalities. It cost me almost $15,000 in closing costs and later found out about unecessary lender fees. The Government must really control these Lenders who throw in all kinds of hidden and uneccessary charges.
Martin
on
Dear Single Mother in DC, your comment is without merit. If you are in a panic now, about something that may or may not happen in four years from now, then perhaps you should not have purchased at all. Housing expenses always increase (taxes, utilities, etc.) You have four more years to refinance (equity likely). Four more years to pay against the balance. Four moure years to prepare for the "possible" increase in payments. Welcome to the American Dream, responsibility is NOT an option.
Anonymous Also
on
Attention "single mother" Wake up and smell the coffee. IF you want to own something, and not have IT own you, then investigate prior to investing. Home ownership is EARNED. The federal government should be for national defense and very little else. IF you do not understand, then find someone knowledgeable with nothing to gain by sharing information with you and ask them. Remember, 95 percent is perspiration, only 6 percent is inspiration.
Gary Anderson
on
Anonymous also, the government doesn't even do a good job regarding national defense. But it has been really efficient at dispersing easy money to single mothers in an effort to smooth over the dot com crash of 2001 with a housing bubble that is now crashing. Monetary irresponsibility starts with the fed, and the single mom is the victim.
anonymous
on
As a mortgage professional I feel that part of the responsibility lies with us. We should not be helping people to get into houses that we know they can not afford. What happened to the days when we were just as concerned about the borrower's ability to pay, instead of just figuring out a way to get them in anyway so that we can make a paycheck?
Sam
on
The 'close at any cost' mentality that permeates some sectors of the lending industry is to blame for a lot of the problems. Borrowers rarely know where their income needs to be to get approved. When it comes time to inflate or create income, it is generally an industry professional who is behind those false numbers. Combine falsified income with a resetting loan and you can see why consumers are in jeopardy. Martin, I hope you sleep well at night. Nice attitude
anonymous
on
The housing industry sectors that supports affordable housing initiatives do so in an effort to provide families and individuals with the opportunity to own a home. Families and individuals from lower income brackets should have equal opportunity to enjoy the wealth creation and social benefits realized more easily by people in higher income brackets. Responsible, sustainable homeownership is the goal. The problem comes when mortgage professionals act with careless disregard and greed.
Matt
on
I agree with Gary, we as mortgage professionals are setting some up for foreclosures and failure. Unfortunately we are in a market that rewards us more for subprime loans. I have called previous clients of old, to find out that half of them had hard times, lates, foreclosures! How many loans have you done with 580 scores and a 55dti???
wh15k3y
on
When was the last time ANY of you "mortgage professionals" offered someone post purchase counseling, when you knew that you were doing an "at risk" loan?............my guess? NEVER! So put your professionalism where your "better than thou" attitude is and lets help people become succesful homeowners by being responsible mortgage brokers.
rparker
on
Despite what people say I doubt that there will be a huge level of shock. I say this because inflation is always kept in check which by me means that interest rates will always move in tandem which in this case mean slowly.
MJ
on
One-year adjustment on my ARM is approaching. Spotless credit and good job did not help me on application. Averge one-income homeowner can't afford payments on conventional loans. The real issue lurking underneath ARMs: One income homeowners can't afford payments on a conventional loan, even with large down payment. The monthly on my house would have been double that of a conventional. House prices have reached a level where the working person can't afford a home. That American Dream is gone.
Donall
on
I agree with MJ ! Rates are outrageous and I pay double that of what everyone else I know pays. And thats even with a hard working broker "on my side". Single income, hard working guys get breaks? Unheard of.
Anonymous
on
I have an excellent credit rating, a very good job and salary and still cannot afford the ARM on my property due to increase this year because of unscrupulous mortgage lenders and appraisers who in collaboration with the mortgage broker appraised my home at 35K more than it is really worth. Then came the housing downturn. l have to sell at a loss in order to protect my credit rating. I'm mad as hell-don't know where to turn. I'd like an investigation of these brokers -they should go to prison.
Viva
on
I am curious about the folks who find themselves in mortgage trouble. Did you use mortgage brokers? Were you steered to the loan you have now? Were you aware that the loan payments would increase? What sort of due diligence did you do? Did you explore many options and compare them? It's natural to want to blame others but we need to educate ourselves since we are the only ones on our side.
Steve
on
I agree with you Kathy. Owning a home is definitely a privilege but what about those that can't afford an apartment or any place to live at all?
Melissa
on
Answering Viva, I have this exact type of loan. It's a 80/20 subprime with the 80% being a 2/28 ARM (6 mo LIBOR, 6.1% margin) and the 20% being a 12yr fixed IO. The rates are 8.5% and 12.65% respectively. I did it because I make good money and have no debt, but had bad credit in the past. This was to "rebuild" my credit. I knew all this going in and my $2000 payment is about to adjust to $2600/month. I can pay it but I see where others with less income/research would be shocked...