Top News


Mortgage Rates
30 Yr FRM 5.32% -0.10%
15 Yr FRM 4.77% -0.10%
1 Yr ARM 4.94% 0.01%
5/1 Yr ARM 4.88% -0.11%
30 YR Tres 4.32% 0.00%
Fed Prime 3.25% 0.00%
Receive Free Email Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news and blog posts with our free News Alert Service.  Or if you are already a member, click here to login.

Tax Maven Warns of Problems with New Housing Bill

   |     Print   |     Bookmark

The Housing Assistance Act of 2008, finally passed by both houses of Congress and signed into law by President Bush this week, contains some not-to-pleasant surprises for the unwary taxpayer according to an article by Eva Rosenberg published this week in MarketWatch.

Rosenberg is the founder of TaxMama.Com, and is licensed to argue on behalf of taxpayers before the Internal Revenue Service. She has just written a new e-book entitled "The 100% Home-Based Business Tax Solution."

According to Rosenberg, the bill, which is intended to assist homeowners on the verge of losing their homes, "is likely to cause more upset than calm" for taxpayers.



She outlines several areas where the tax law was changed along with housing law and warns that there are pitfalls with each.

The bill grants a tax credit of up to $7,500 to new homeowners. Eligible recipients are those who have not owned a primary residence for three years (although they may own a vacation property or a time share). The tax credit represents an amount up to 10 percent of the purchase price and couples in commuting marriages can each purchase a home although they have to share the credit.

But the credit is not a gift from the government. It is actually a loan and must be repaid in 15 years, starting the second year after the home purchase. Granted it is an interest free loan but if the home is sold in less than 15 years the balance must be repaid immediately except in the case of the death of the homeowner or with some exceptions for divorce or other emergency situations.

The main downside to this provision is that it will require filing a tax return regardless of the status of the homeowner. The credit is added to any refund due the taxpayer and loan payments are deducted from refunds or added to the tax obligation. The credit and the obligation to file a refund to collect and repay it could affect seniors living on fixed incomes and Social Security and may require using a professional tax preparation service. Taxpayers who neglect repaying the "loan" will be subject to all of the usual IRS penalties for non-filing and non-payment.

There is also a change in the standard deduction for real property taxes. Couples may now deduct taxes up to $1,000 ($500 for singles) for "qualified" taxes, i.e. those that could have been deducted on Schedule A by those taxpayers who can itemize. This provision is intended to help those who cannot itemize, but if the deduction is taken based on the tax credit it can not be claimed on Schedule C, the home/office provision or any other schedule. Rosenberg does not specify whether the taxpayer can pick where to apply the deduction.

Owners of vacation homes or investment property are about to lose that juicy capital-gains exclusion when they sell the second home. For the last eight or nine years there has been a game where owners moved from principal residence to investment or recreation property to new personal residence to satisfy the requirements to qualify for the $250,000 ($500,000 for couples) exclusion of sale profits. Under the new law taxes will be levied on sale proceeds of second homes based on the number of days the house was not a qualified personal residence. Any gain resulting from appreciation on the property after May 6, 1997 will be taxed as ordinary income.

Starting in 2011, merchant banks will be required to send a report to the IRS itemizing income to every merchant account. This includes sales on eBay or from credit or debit card purchases for other goods or services. In the past the IRS had to obtain a subpoena to access this type of information ' now they can conduct an audit at almost any time. This is apparently intended to keep those who apply for the credit honest as eligibility phases out depending on income.

Many of the provisions of the housing rescue bill will not kick in for several years (while the tax credit expires on June 30, 2009) and many others will be refined by IRS regulations and ultimately case law. But anyone who plans to avail themselves of the tax credit or the ability to claim a property tax payment against income taxes should be aware that there are problems that could be costly and should contact a tax professional for assistance.


Comments

Join Now to Post Comments

Wayne
on Fri, Aug 1 2008 7:00 AM
There is one thing you can always count on with the U.S. Gov't and Congress. They represent the special interests and deep pockets, so it's now surprise this bill is a mess. There must have been dozens of lawyers involved in writing this bill with their own agendas who had to answer to higher ups. On the bright side, when there are too many cooks in the kitchen, there will be unintended consquences and loopholes that can be taken advantage of by the taxpayer. I firmly believe nothing happens in this country by accident, especially in politics or when there is money involved. The dollar bill will always rule until it's destroyed by greed, taxes and special interests that are not necessarily loyal to this country.
Cody The Credit Cowboy
on Fri, Aug 1 2008 7:00 AM
There is a answer to credit issues. 100% legal credit repair!
Larry
on Fri, Aug 1 2008 7:00 AM
Wow ! This home owner bailout seems to be more trouble than it's worth ! No wonder Bush signed it so fast . It's a rip off ! Almost useless to the average home owner on the brink ! You would have to be in very desperate conditions to even consider it. It seems too complicated : as usual and as expected. They have danced around and done everything they could to keep from forcing the mortgage companies to lower their rates (mandatory), to a place where the borrower could live with . Which would have been the simplest thing to do. Something we all could use ! I'll be curious to see how many of the 400 (some) million people actually benefit from the mess Congress has labeled "help" ! What a Joke ! Yet another one I mean !
borr
on Fri, Aug 1 2008 7:00 AM
Countrywide -Learn to make a decision in 30 days, not 150 days on short sales. Buyers walk, the value drops even more. Surely Countrywide you know the market by now. Stop with the $1,000 offers to the junior lienholders. Try to use someone's head to figure out the best deal, it does not always mean the one where Countrywide gets the most money. Example of Countrywide-decision- a customer is out of work for a year. he was a mortgage broker. countrywide starts fc, sale date is 8/31/08. the man gets a job 2 weeks prior to sale date making $10,000 per month. He can now 2 1/2 of the payment , Countrywide refuses to work with him. He owes 450,000 on the house. The present value is 230,000. and countrywide has six other properties in the same neighborhood that have been setting for 6 plus months. Please tell me what part of this makes any sense. The said thing countrywide believes that are doing a good job. Wake up and smell the weeds.
Paul
on Sat, Aug 2 2008 7:00 AM
It never fails, just another blow for the little man.
Matt Gerchow
on Tue, Aug 5 2008 7:00 AM
Did any of you read this correctly? Can you believe this was snuck in on a housing bill? "Starting in 2011, merchant banks will be required to send a report to the IRS itemizing income to every merchant account. This includes sales on eBay or from credit or debit card purchases for other goods or services. In the past the IRS had to obtain a subpoena to access this type of information - now they can conduct an audit at almost any time. This is apparently intended to keep those who apply for the credit honest as eligibility phases out depending on income." This sounds like another attempt at regulating the internet and looking after possible tax dollars that it might be missing. Do you remember when the post office was going to try to get a nickel per email? It reminds me of the line Princess Leah said in Star Wars...Lord Vader, the tighter you make your grip, the more that slips right through your fingers. This will cause a whole new wave of people banking off shore and transferring citizenship to countries where taxation is less. To all of the people out there that have been expecting the government to get involved and solve this housing crisis...I hope you are happy.
Anonymous
on Fri, Aug 8 2008 7:00 AM
The question is how will this work out for those getting a divorce and the mortgage is upside down? Will it allow the new mortgage to have only 1 name on it?
cjh
on Wed, Aug 13 2008 7:00 AM
When will the lenders stop? According to an aquaintance, her mother's home was held in lieu of her own when she lost her home to a lender who was not upfront about what they would do on the interest rate. When lender foreclosed on my friend's home, she went to live with her mother, whose home was paid for. Because the daughter's name was on the deed, the daughter's lender is now threatening to attach a lein the mother's home. It seems just when you think you have landed on your feet the roof literally comes crashing down. How can this continue to happen? When grand ma's house isn't a safe haven where will we go?
Mark
on Fri, Aug 22 2008 7:00 AM
Short sales are nothing more then a scam by Realtors to get their sign in the yard. They offer false hope to the owners and create an unrealistic expectation of value/cost to the perspective buyer. This only serves to prolong the recovery. I imagine that most lenders have no idea that their collateral is offered as a short sale. The properties must be foreclosed on and the title washed at the trustee sale, then offered for sale.