Top News


Mortgage Rates
30 Yr FRM 5.32% -0.10%
15 Yr FRM 4.77% -0.10%
1 Yr ARM 4.94% 0.01%
5/1 Yr ARM 4.88% -0.11%
30 YR Tres 4.32% 0.00%
Fed Prime 3.25% 0.00%
Receive Free Email Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news and blog posts with our free News Alert Service.  Or if you are already a member, click here to login.

Efforts Made To Help Borrowers Avoid Foreclosure

   |     Print   |     Bookmark

A few things have happened in the last few days that may ultimately ease what many are calling an onrushing foreclosure train wreck.

While some attempts are more meaningful and far-reaching than others, at least a couple of institutions which can do something to avert any coming catastrophe appear to be moving in that direction and it is heartening to see that the system may be capable of responding to trouble.

The Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) and the American Association of Residential Mortgage Regulators (AARMR) just issued a joint consumer alert on mortgage payment increases. The alert urged homeowners with adjustable rate mortgages and especially those with the non-traditional types such as interest only or payment option mortgages to plan immediately for any resets of their rates in the coming year.



The advisory states that borrowers should seek information on the characteristics of their mortgages and begin to budget to meet any future rate shocks. Consumers are also urged to contact their mortgage servicers immediately if they anticipate problems or are already having difficulty with their payments.

The two organizations also issued a letter to mortgage servicers and providers urging them to reach out to their borrowers to provide appropriate loan information and to work with them to prevent the loss of their homes.

CSBS Senior Vice President for Regulatory Affairs Michael Stevens said, "Servicers should provide information on when the recast will occur and how much the monthly payment will adjust. Should the loan go into default, servicers should consider workout arrangements to prevent foreclosures."

Freddie Mac is also touting its foreclosure avoidance activities. The corporation, along with Fannie Mae, the Mortgage Bankers Association, and 20 other mortgage industry leaders has established NeighborWorks America which is sponsoring a public service advertising campaign on television urging troubled homeowners to face their problems and seek help. Two of the ads can be viewed on the Freddie Mac website (www.freddiemac.com).

A Freddie-sponsored survey conducted by Roper Public Affairs and Media found that 74 percent of home mortgage borrowers were very interested in seeking the assistance of housing counselors in avoiding foreclosure yet only 64 percent had been aware of the existence of such counselors. Only 61 percent of borrowers who were already late on mortgage payments were even aware that there was help available to them.

Freddie Mac is working with its servicers to establish and enforce guidelines for avoiding foreclosure and offering incentives to servicers who are proactive in this regard. Freddie, however, also wants its servicers to conclude the legal proceedings in a timely manner if the loan can not be salvaged. The corporation has a complicated schedule of rewards (some quite substantial) and penalties for servicers who follow or fail to follow the various standards.

Perhaps the most far-reaching housing effort was announced on Thursday by Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) although it is designed to make housing more affordable going forward rather than reducing the problems with existing mortgages.

Frank, who is chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, has introduced a bill which would put $1 billion into a fund to build affordable housing. The money, which would be partially funded by profits from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, would go directly to local communities, states, and other recipients to build or rehabilitate 1.5 million housing units in the next 10 years.

In announcing the new legislation Frank laid part of the blame for the current subprime mortgage problems on the lack of affordable housing, saying that lack pushed many people into purchasing homes they could not afford.

Hearings on the proposed legislation will begin on July 12.

In related news, Caliber Global Investment Ltd., a fund listed on the London Stock Exchange announced on Thursday that it is closing down due to the turmoil in the subprime market. The fund which is managed by Cambridge Place Investment Management hopes to sell all of its assets over the next year and return as much money as possible to its investors.

Caliber controlled almost $1 billion in assets. More than half of the assets were residential mortgage-backed securities, the majority of which were from the U.S.


Comments

Join Now to Post Comments

Mark Hastert
on Fri, Jun 29 2007 7:00 AM
Has it occured to the lenders and powers that control lending policy & practices that just maybe the problem is that the subprime borrower is allowed to take on more than they can afford? The borrower has already demonstrated their poor credit worthiness so they simply should not be borrowing as much money. Why is this so hard to understand?
CWolford
on Mon, Jul 2 2007 7:00 AM
I think the problem moreso is that there exists a mindset of entitlement without personal responsibility. I have been a mortgage banker for nearly 10 years, and it amazes me how people blame lenders for offering them products that they have demanded we provide. The subprime guidelines were liberal, but how many people can really afford to pay out 50% of their gross income to their mortgage? Just because you qualify, doesn't mean it's the right decision. What ever happened to common sense?
Mortgage 101
on Mon, Jul 2 2007 7:00 AM
I would like to remind you that it also has to deal with MANY people are losing, have lost their jobs. Hence they can not afford their payment. At least in MI that is the current case. Values of their homes have gone down, they can not afford to bring in the extra monies in the case if they did want to refinance say out of a option arm and or regular arm product.
Anonymous
on Wed, Jul 4 2007 7:00 AM
Response to CWolford. How about the responsibility of mortgage originators who put people (most of whom do not understand the mortgage product they are sold) into loans that require 50% of their gross income? Commission based origination, LO selection of appraisers and the wink, wink sell, sell attitude of lenders has corrupted the origination process. Many noob LO's are taught that unethical practices are business as usual. Regulation, licensing and accountability are coming...sleep in it.
Jane
on Mon, Aug 20 2007 7:00 AM
In response to Mortgage 101: I've also been in the mortgage business for 10 plus years and I have seen only a handful of times a lender who has advised a borrower to not purchase a home that they qualified for. Regardless of whether the borrower qualifies at 30% or at 55% of their income there are few loan officers that would turn away a purchase because it wasn't the smart thing for the borrower to do. Esp. in a market where the competition for realtor business is fierce.