Learn. Share. Connect. (54,646 Members)  - Join
 

Site Tools

Join Now or Sign In
for Full Access to All Features
Mortgage Rates
30 Yr FRM 5.01% 0.03%
15 Yr FRM 4.40% 0.01%
1 Yr ARM 4.22% -0.07%
5/1 Yr ARM 4.27% 0.02%
30 YR Tres 4.51% 0.01%
Fed Prime 3.25% 0.00%

Recent Video

The Senate is crafting jobs legislation, and Sen. Charles...
Feb. 9 (Bloomberg) -- Bloomberg's Sara Eisen reports...
Receive Free Email Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news and blog posts with our free News Alert Service

NAHB Green Building Legislation Offers Incentives to Lenders

by Glenn Setzer on
 Email Page   |     Print   |     Bookmark

The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) urged Congress this week to move forward on legislation to improve energy efficiency and sustainability in housing without driving costs above manageable levels.

Jerry Howard, NAHB executive vice president and CEO testified before a House Financial Services Committee hearing on H.R. 6078, the Green Resources for Energy Efficient Neighborhood Act (or the GREEN Act) of 2008.

NAHB has been involved in voluntary green building since the early 1990s. Currently, the association is working with the International Code Council to complete a rigorous standards-developing process that will produce the first standard approved by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for green residential construction and remodeling ' the National Green Building Standard'.

The GREEN Act, sponsored by Rep. Ed Perlmutter, (D-CO) provides incentives to lenders to provide lower interest loans and other benefits to consumers who build, buy, or remodel their homes or businesses to improve energy efficiency.

In addition the law would require Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to finance energy efficient and location efficient mortgages such as buildings located near mass transit.

In prepared remarks for the Committee, Rep Perlmutter said that his bill's goal is to create a market for energy efficient and location efficient mortgages by making the GSE's, FHA and HUD eager to collect them.

This would be accomplished by amending the charters for Fannie and Freddie to buy, sell, service and otherwise deal in energy and location efficient mortgages and amending the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act to require data information for the number of and dollar amount of mortgages of single-family and multi-family housing which meet these standards.

HR 6078 would also require the FHA to insure $1 billion worth of energy efficient homes.

NAHB's Howard spoke to the Committee about ways to improve sustainability and energy efficiency in housing while still supporting housing affordability.

"Because federal housing programs are such a critical component of the nation's housing system, NAHB believes that it is important to ensure that the incorporation of sustainable building practices for these programs is accomplished in a thoughtful and practical manner," said Howard. "Also, it is important to maintain a balance between the goals of affordable housing development and maximizing energy efficiency."

Howard cautioned that setting overly stringent standards or unrealistic goals could boost the cost of building affordable housing to a level that is not sustainable over the long term.

He urged the members of the committee to keep certain principles in mind as they worked to adopt green criteria for federally assisted housing programs:

  • Avoid naming specific green criteria in federal legislation that may seem sufficient today, but that could become quickly outdated or unworkable in the very near term.
  • Provide necessary resources, including the additional staff and technology needed to implement the programs, as well as appropriations to help support the additional costs of building green.
  • Structure new programs in a manner that allows them to be used easily with other housing programs without duplicative rules and regulations.
  • Provide financial and other incentives to developers and builders of affordable housing to help them meet and even exceed green building goals.
  • Work with builders, lenders, the GSEs, nonprofits, community groups, appraisers and others to develop attainable goals for supportive financing mechanisms such as energy-efficient and location-efficient mortgages as well as appraisal standards that appropriately recognize the value of green building.
  • Develop educational materials to communicate best practices and promote sustainable federally assisted housing.

Comments

Join Now or Login to Post Comments

Larry
on
Nice : More help for lenders : No help for consumers ! Why not give energy incentive rebates to consumers who build or remodel or add energy efficent devices such as solar or wind generated electric to their houses ? It is so expensive to do these things now that it hardly works out as a savings. Also legislation concerning the Electric companies exegious and over blown costs to consumers who want to hook up to the electrical grid and sell energy back to the company using wind generators and other means ! In a time of energy crisis like we are in and the cost of everything going through the roof it is time to re-examine what oil , electric and gas companies are doing to block alternative energy usage and stop them cold : Give the incentive to the customer ! Lenders get enough free rides !
Harlan Cooper
on
Larry, You asked "Why not give energy incentive rebates to consumers who build or remodel or add energy efficient devices such as solar or wind generated electric to their houses?" There are incentives and rebates available to consumers for energy efficient and renewable energy improvements. Here is a website provided by the NC State University, College of Engineering where you can see what is available Federally and also in your specific state and area: http://www.dsireusa.org/ Unfortunately the individual Federal Tax rebate for certain improvements expired 12/31/2007. There is however still an individual Federal Tax rebate for up to $2,000 for solar energy improvements that is available until 12/31/2008. Regarding your characterization of lenders getting a "free ride." The incentives given a lender to provide mortgages on energy efficient housing typically do not involve a payment or tax break directly to the lender. The incentives are more liberal underwriting guidelines and increased demand/liquidity for energy efficient mortgages. This results in more consumers qualifying for these loans and lower cost and interest rates on these loans. These energy efficient mortgages can then be marketed to consumers at a lower rate and cost that helps to make up for the increased cost to the consumer of green building. The lender wins by increased production, i.e. is able to make more loans to more people and therefore make more money. The consumer wins by getting loans at a lower rate and/or cost to purchase homes with energy efficient improvements. Harlan M. Cooper, President TransNet Mortgage Corporation
on
We have a historic opportunity to retrofit our existing housing stock by having lenders who have taken homes back to add energy improvements. Lenders are busy as heck with refinances but very, very few lenders are offering the EIM (Energy Improvement Mortgage) to add energy improvements to their homes. We need to start looking at the borrowers’ ability to repay based on PITI-UM (adding utilities and maintenance). Currently we don’t factor for energy costs that can be several hundred dollars a month. Energy Efficient and Green homes are selling faster and for more $ per sq foot (Seattle, WA and Portland OR MLS). In time, we can have green and EIM mortgage backed securities and these will be in demand thus providing a sustainable - market driven – green mortgage with a lower rate to consumers without government subsidies. Porterworks provides consulting and training to lenders on energy efficiency and green building.