Top News


Mortgage Rates
30 Yr FRM 5.32% -0.10%
15 Yr FRM 4.77% -0.10%
1 Yr ARM 4.94% 0.01%
5/1 Yr ARM 4.88% -0.11%
30 YR Tres 4.32% 0.00%
Fed Prime 3.25% 0.00%
Receive Free Email Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news and blog posts with our free News Alert Service.  Or if you are already a member, click here to login.

NHMC and NAA Sue HUD over Language Requirements

   |     Print   |     Bookmark

Two associations representing owners of multi-family properties have brought suit again the Department of Housing and Urban Development over new regulations that require them to provide written materials and services to tenants and potential tenants for whom English is not their primary language.

The National Multi Housing Council (NMHC) and National Apartment Association (NAA) filed suit in federal court against HUD asking that the Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Guidance which went into effect in March be struck down. These rules require federally funded apartment owners to translate numerous documents into multiple languages and to provide verbal translation services for those who cannot read the documents when translated.



Jim Arbury, Senior Vice President of Government Affairs for both NMHC and NAA said in a press release, "Although we share HUD's goal of expanding access to housing programs for people with LEP, HUD has exceeded its statutory authority and its Guidance is clearly illegal. It effectively rewrites federal anti-discrimination law and makes it illegal to communicate only in English. ...courts all the way up to the Supreme Court have ruled that providing services in English only does not constitute discrimination."

Not only do these requirements exceed HUD's authority Arbury said, "They are also unlawfully vague and unduly burdensome. He stated that the guidance does not specify the documents that must be translated or the level of assistance that must be provided."

"To comply, firms are effectively forced to identify all the languages likely to be spoken by residents and potential residents and then to maintain a fleet of translators to translate documents into those languages. The Guidance even goes so far as to require firms to make translators available for oral translations at a moment's notice, no matter how few persons with LEP the firm is serving."

Arbury suggested that, rather than putting the burden on apartment owners, HUD should use its own resources to translate the necessary documents into the more than 100 different languages spoken in the U.S. rather than requiring thousands of individual apartment firms and individual apartment owners to duplicate that activity across the country.

"Every dollar spent on this misguided policy is a dollar that could be spent serving needy families and maintaining their properties," said Arbury. "We are calling on HUD to withdraw its Guidance, to act proactively to translate important rental documents and to create a hotline to handle inquiries from LEP persons."


Comments

Join Now to Post Comments

Lori
on Mon, May 7 2007 7:00 AM
How ridiculous is that? I'm sure there are private groups who would love to help people that cannot read these forms, whether it be because their English is limited or they just flat out can't read. Why put the burden on the landlord? I'd rather we spent those same government oversight dollars to teach people to read so they can read ALL the forms, not just have these few translated!
susan
on Tue, May 8 2007 7:00 AM
Amen, Lori! The money should be spent on teaching people to read and write in English. I wonder if these people who cannot read or write in English are in this country legally. Maybe that needs to be the first requirement to determine whether the apartment should be rented at all to the tenant.
Janey
on Tue, May 8 2007 7:00 AM
This smacks of BIG BROTHER government once again not making individuals responsible for their own actions. I've worked with many people who do not understand English but they bring someone with them who does. This is NOT the landlords or other entities responsibility.
Curtis Thomas
on Tue, May 8 2007 7:00 AM
I am against forcing anyone to offer materials or translators for those that do not speak English. This country speaks English. If people do not like that, they should not have come here to begin with. I would also be against the government spending my money for document translation. This should totally be a burden of those that do not speak English. There are plenty of people in this country that simply do not understand documents. Are we to hire attorneys for them as well? NO!
geverett
on Tue, May 8 2007 7:00 AM
This is America, why not require all those living in federally funded housing to learn to read and speak the language of the land, ENGLISH? Why continue to create a society of dependents? Encourage individuals to be responsible for their personal empowerment and sustainability. Why did they come here in the first place? This is the land of opportunity. Let them earn it.