 |
| 30 Yr Fix |
6.63% |
0.37% |
| 15 Yr Fix |
6.18% |
0.40% |
| 1 Yr ARM |
5.49% |
0.39% |
| 5/1 ARM |
6.16% |
0.36% |
| 30 Yr Tres |
4.70% |
0.04% |
| Fed Prime |
5.00% |
-0.25% |
|
|
|
|
 |
Free Subscription To News Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news with our free News
Alert Service. |
|
|
Greenspan Renews Attack on Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae
4452
Views - Printer Friendly - Email
This Story To A Friend
Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan has spoken out again
in favor of limits on the multi-million dollar portfolio holdings of the two
biggest players in the mortgage game, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.
In remarks prepared for delivery via satellite to a housing conference in Atlanta,
the Chairman restated his belief that Congress should put stringent limits on
the two Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) which together
hold mortgages and mortgage backed securities valued at about $1.5
trillion. Their combined holdings 15 years ago were $132 billion. Greenspan
stated that these holdings were far above that needed to allow the two corporations
to fulfill their respective housing missions.
If Congress were to limit these holdings to the numbers needed for those missions
it would require substantial liquidation on the part of the two GSEs, a task
that Greenspan has repeatedly said could be accomplished with little disruption
to the housing market.
Greenspan has, over the last few months, repeatedly called for portfolio restrictions.
He seems particularly troubled by what he views is a public perception that
Freddie and Fannie are government insured entities. This, he has stated, not
only promotes risk-taking on the part of some investors, but also gives the
corporations a competitive advantage when it comes to mortgage rates.
The two were created by Congress as vehicles to pump money into the housing
market but are both publicly traded stock companies. If Congress
fails to rein in the size of the portfolios, he said Thursday, it might risk
“solidifying investors’ perceptions that the GSE’s are instruments
of the government.” This competitive advantage over other financial companies
is leading to a dangerous concentration of power in the two, he said.
Chairman Greenspan said that the Federal Reserve sees little evidence that
the availability of fixed rate mortgages is tied to the portfolios and that
it is doubtful that the two companies’ portfolios can influence home ownership,
contribute to mortgage liquidity or to the advancement of capital markets. Homeownership,
he said, seems to be increasing because of the growing incomes of households
and generally low borrowing costs.
Related Tags
Select a Tag for more information related to that Tag. (View
All Tags)
mortgage rates
|
Comments (3)
| It's the plethora of loan products available for home borrowers, NOT Freddie or Fannie, who helps home ownership. Freddie doesn't act on the Mortgage Fraud reported to it although they have a so-called Exclusionary List of the Mortgage Fraud players. Fannie doesn't even track Mortgage Fraud or know what to do when Mortgage Fraud is reported to it. |
|
| Above Posted By:
Jack Olson
| Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:54:08 EST |
| Why limit a company that the government originally used to spur the economy. The government needs to get their hands out of business. Laws are quick to write and slow to undue. Things like this will work themselves out on there own. More than likely it will come from a grass-root initiative vs. a government directive. |
|
| Above Posted By:
Zumi
| Tue, 24 May 2005 18:50:05 EST |
| We should limit the GSEs since they have been involved in predatory lending and fraud. |
|
| Above Posted By:
N Lavalle
| Sun, 22 May 2005 09:49:04 EST |
Post A Comment
Please fill out the form below to submit a comment.
|
 |
|
This makes me want to invest in the failing lenders and wait for the profits to role in. The FEDS will never allow them to fail an...
Read
|
HOLY COW, people! Doesn't anybody with any common sense SEE what is going on in this country? With bank closings, our economy is s...
Read
|
While this information is not as bad as analysts expected it to be, it certainly is not good. We are in a real crisis here in this...
Read
|
|