Mortgage News Home

Saturday May 17, 2008

Home Page   24,327 Active Members   Register Welcome, Guest    Sign In  

Home

Latest Headlines

Popular Stories

Bookmark Us

Reader Comments

SUBSCRIBE

SEARCH OUR SITE

RSS News

Mortgage Rates
  30 Yr Fix 6.01% -0.04%
  15 Yr Fix 5.60% 0.00%
  1 Yr ARM 5.18% -0.11%
  5/1 ARM 5.57% -0.10%
  30 Yr Tres 4.58% -0.06%
  Fed Prime 5.00% -0.25%
MND Features

- Wiki
- Video News
- Mortgage License Information
- Real Estate License Information
- Mortgage Content Syndication
- Mortgage Fraud
- Housing Bubble
News Archives

Submit A News Tip
or Story Idea
 

Free Subscription To News Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news with our free News Alert Service.


Senator Obama Lays out Housing Policy - Third in a Series

5960 Views - Printer Friendly - Email This Story To A Friend
 
RSS COMMENTS(14) LINK HERE ADD NEWS TO YOUR WEBSITE

Also Read: Clinton Housing Plan - McCain Housing Plan

The third candidate to outline his plans for ending the housing market meltdown was Senator Barack Obama.

Speaking at Cooper Union in New York recently the senator addressed the need for tightening regulations and reforming the financial regulatory system as well as presenting a proposal for a second economic stimulus package.

His economic blueprint included:

I. Modernizing the Financial Regulatory System.

Senator Obama said that the government has let the special interests set the regulatory agenda and it is time to reconsider how we oversee the financial markets. He laid out six principles necessary to this reform.

  1. Provide the Federal Reserve with basic supervisory authority over any financial institution to which it makes credit available as a lender of last resort. Saying that the Fed exists to ensure stability not to bail out financial institutions, he emphasized that any institution that has access to the discount window or similar facilities must be subject to prudent oversight to make sure it is not taking excessive risks with taxpayer money.
  2. Capital, liquidity and disclosure requirements should be developed and strengthened for all financial institutions and there must be examination and reform of credit rating companies.
  3. End our balkanized framework of overlapping and competing regulatory agencies. Large and complex financial institutions no longer fit under a single regulatory authority. The system must be streamlined and capable of identifying where risks actual reside in the system.
  4. Regulate financial institutions for what they do, rather than who they are. Current regulation is rooted in the legal status of financial firms - banks fall under the authority of several regulators, investment banks under yet another set, even though they may operate in the same business.
  5. Crack down on trading activity that crosses the line to market manipulation.
  6. Identify systemic risks to the financial system. The Senator said that we should create a financial market oversight commission which would report regularly to the president, his Financial Working Group, and Congress on important issues to be addressed before they deteriorate into crisis.

II. Help Homeowners facing Foreclosure and Ease the Credit Crunch.

Senator Obama said he would take the following steps to solve the current foreclosure and credit liquidity problems.

  1. Create a new Federal Housing Administration Housing Security Program. The Senator supports the efforts of Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT) to create a new program that will incentivize lenders to buy or refinance existing mortgages and convert them into stable 30-year fixed mortgages with a federal guarantee provided for the resulting loans. Senator Obama called this a "backstop" not a "bailout."
  2. Ask lenders to write down loan amounts for more conventional borrowers. Lenders should take action to restructure loans as early as possible when borrowers are at risk of financial trouble or when housing prices plummet. To alleviate lender concerns over tax and legal issues, the Senator's plan also calls for legislation that will clarify the ability of servicers to act on behalf of the loans investors/owners.
  3. Closing the bankruptcy loophole for mortgage companies. Under current Chapter 13 rules, judges cannot modify the terms of home mortgages, even if the loan was unfair or predatory. Making this change could prevent as many as 600,000 foreclosures.
  4. Create a new mortgage interest tax credit which will assist homeowners who do not itemize their taxes. This would involve a 10 percent universal mortgage credit which will, effectively, cut 10 percent off of the interest rate paid by 10 million, mostly low income, home owners.
  5. Provide an additional $10 billion of Mortgage Revenue Bond (MRB) authority. These are used to refinance subprime loans and provide mortgages for first-time homebuyers but are currently over-subscribed in most states.
  6. Combat mortgage fraud and predatory subprime lending by defining mortgage fraud on the federal level, increasing funding for federal and state law enforcement programs and creating new criminal penalties for fraud.
  7. Require more accurate and understandable loan disclosure documents.

III. Enact a second $30 billion stimulus package specific to the mortgage crisis.

The $30 billion amount would include a $10 billion foreclosure prevention fund to help Americans keep their homes. Aimed only at homeowners (not speculators or vacation home owners) the fund will increase pre-foreclosure counseling resources, help offset the costs of selling a home, and help low-income borrowers get additional time and support to pay back any losses from the sale of their home. The fund will also allow the federal government to pair with state governments and local organizations and lenders to ensure fair loan modifications can be made in a timely manner that avoids the need for foreclosure or bankruptcy.

A second $10 billion would be used to assist state and local governments that are facing revenue shortfalls because of the housing crisis and the slowing economy. This fund would help ensure that a decline in property values will not force governments to slash critical public services and infrastructure spending.

Finally, Senator Obama called for an extension of unemployment benefits to temporarily cover workers who have exhausted their current eligibility and extend eligibility to more workers including many part-time and non-traditional workers who are not currently included in the system.

Also Read: Clinton Housing Plan - McCain Housing Plan



Story Views: 5960 | Permalink

Story Tools



Email This Story To A Friend

Subscribe To News Alerts
 

Related Tags

Select a Tag for more information related to that Tag. (View All Tags)
 
housing crisis barack obama federal reserve foreclosures credit crunch fha bankruptcy mortgage fraud

 

Comments (14)

Post Comment Comments RSS


Today I signed my Loan Modification Agreement with Countrywide Bank. Countrywide Home Retention Department received approval for my loan modification at an interest rate of 4.25% fixed for 30 years. It took 4 months and 3 weeks to get to this point. The loan amount owed did not change at this date. My new loan payment did increase about $600.00 per month. However the new payment does not add the additional $1580.00 per month on average to the loan balance every month. The original interest rate was 7.25% and the investor guideline allowed the modification down 3% below the current interest rate. This is great if you can prove that you are able to make the new loan payment. I will send an update once the loan modification is complete.

Above Posted By: Douglas M. Thomson Sr. | Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:23:12 EST

The saddest thing EVEr is reading all of you debating over who to elect and how they will help us. If you don't know this already take a true conservative's advice........the minute you debate over who in the government is best fit to help our economy you have already lost. Only you can help you. relying on a politician is like asking a child molester to babysit.

Above Posted By: patrick | Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:12:39 EST

Want the housing crash to end tomorrow? Do not intervene. Let home values come down in alignment with existing real and local median incomes. Let banks and mortgage lenders who based their entire business strategy on no doc lending to fail and allow new entrants to take their place. Regulate homebuilders who utilized bribery to get realtors to sell their homes at given prices, and kept right on building. Institute federal and state regulations of realtors so that they operate under a true code of ethics not some Mickey Mouse self-declaration crap. Also, encourage change in the customary commission structure for realtors to be paid based on flat rates of service rather than based on home sales price. Regulate mortgage lenders more strictly. Allow people to declare banruptcy more easily, rebuild their lives and move on. DO NOT RAISE TAXES.

Above Posted By: Markus | Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:55:18 EST

I only have one thing to say... NO TAX PAYER BAILOUTS OF ANY FORECLOSURES!!! NO Dederal Gaurantee's of Bad loans!

Above Posted By: Purple Flash | Sat, 5 Apr 2008 15:32:33 EST

I was a huge Obama fan until I discovered that his housing proposals reek of elitism. The Democrats, on the whole, have let me down with their proposals to support the landed gentry with tenants' tax money. The 31 percent of the population that cannot afford property is bleeding and the so-called progressives want to apply leeches. Aside from the shameless bailout proposals, Obama wants to give even more tax breaks to mortgage-holders. He wants to let people in low-tax, low-cost states who don't itemize get the standard dediction AND a tax credit for their mortgage interest. Guess who gets to pay for that? Non-property owners.

Above Posted By: mary l | Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:47:18 EST

So, who do you vote for when all options SUCK? Seriously, I can't believe these are our only options.

Above Posted By: brad | Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:30:13 EST

It'll be hard to decide which of the poor choices to vote for...again! I don't see signs that any of the candidates really "gets" what caused the mortgage mess, nor do any of them have any good ideas. All see afraid to say it, if they personally feel there should be no bailout of irresponsible businesses and/or buyers. McCain comes closest but it could be lip-service to his party which will turn into just service for corporate cronies if he's elected. Corporate special interests are already getting way to much bailout. Last I read it was virually ONLY businesses involved in creating the mortgage mess who were getting the "lion's share" of the bailout money. What thinking person could look at this and NOT conclude that there is corruption in govt and corporate America?

Above Posted By: Cindy | Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:28:18 EST

Harley, I agree with you that the brunt of the crisis should be borne by those who were careless enough to buy beyond their meansthis is why I don't agree with 'bailouts', however, everybody has a right to property. That is a fundamental tenant to American law and structure (John Locke). I think the fed's problem is predatory tactics used by LOs to rope in the financially uneducated (if you're an LO, don't kid yourself: you have sought to make the most money, which has everything to do with squeezing borrowers for what they're worth). From this view, Obama's proposal is modest and fair.

Above Posted By: Jacob | Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:55:43 EST

Senator Obama represents "change" toward more criminality apparently. He seems to feel that the taxpayers should get screwed with the loan losses. His plan also seems to think that lenders should be forced to take a loss even though they might not want to do this. Obama like Clinton and McCain are part of the group that caused this problem with easy money ala Federal Reserve. Now they want more government incompentence to solve the problem they created.

Above Posted By: Roger Hermann | Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:24:56 EST

As for the mortgage crisis and foreclosures, is it me or is the tail now wagging this dog furiously? Yes, foreclosures are up, but what about those who are NOT in foreclosure? What about those who are paying their bills and honoring their agreements? Are we perhaps moving this corrective action too far in one direction? How about some consideration for the true (red, white and) blue homeowners?

Above Posted By: steve g | Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:11:03 EST

These unemployment numbers are bogus! It's really laughable how the censured media (MSNBC, FOX, and CNN) report it like they are in awe! They must think people got IQ's less than 10, they are uneasy with R word, I think they got the wrong alphabet, but we are all stupid, so who cares

Above Posted By: Harley | Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:40:39 EST

Still not sure why lenders should bear the brunt of all this. People need to be responsible for themselves. They all signed their loan documents. Lenders already paying for their own mistakes with writedowns. We all need to move forward. The lending industry has regulated itself with the dramatic cutbacks in credit guidelines and loan programs. People who do not deserve (and make no mistake - owning a home is not a right) will not be lent money going forward. Allowing a judge to modify the terms of a mortgage will not help. Studies have shown that people who never pay bills on time are very unlikely to turn into responsible credit users. They will still remain delinquent. It will only result in an increased cost to all others as lenders will make us pay for the increased costs of carrying the delinquencies.

Above Posted By: Kevin | Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:33:12 EST

GREAT.. they all agree. I reserving my vote for which ever candidate has a real plan to stimulate the nations economy by LOWERING THE GAS PRICES!!

Above Posted By: Tapped at the Pump | Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:14:36 EST

Whew... I was worried there for a second that one of these canidates would be drafting a policy reminiscent of a Dr. Suess whimzical tale. Although, Hillary's and Barack's are a creative play on words, all three appear to be reiterating what the Treasury and Fed already have in motion. I'm sure whoever gets the office will claim victory for "their" policy outline. If Bernake was correctly quoted, the US has a long road to recovery. One Fish, Two Fish, Red Fish, Blue Fish is my sons favorite, by the way.

Above Posted By: Whos who on Whosville | Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:11:22 EST


Post A Comment

Please fill out the form below to submit a comment.

Name: 
(Required - Type Anonymous or Use First Name Only if Private)
Email Address: 
(Not Required So No Fake Emails Please.)
URL or Weblog:
(Leave Blank If You Don't Have One - Use http://)
Comments: 
(Please keep comments on topic. No HTML Allowed. No Advertisng.)
Please Note: Due to Comment Spam, all comments are reviewed by hand. Most comments will appear shortly after submission but it may take up to 12 hours to appear. If you would like to come back, click here to Bookmark the page.
PLEASE DO NOT USE ALL CAPS


Character Count =     (5000 Character Limit)

If you would like to leave a longer comment, please submit your comments in 5000 character increments and we will merge your comments.
Notify me via email when my comment is approved.


Note: Please don't bother spamming. All submissions are reviewed by our our editorial staff. Comment spam and irrelevant links will not be approved.

 



NEW VIDEO
A New Civil War in Banking
Atlanta Fed President on Banking


Reader Comments (More)
I think that the major problem that started the mortgage crisis was undeclared adjustable rates. Combined witht the fact that peop...
Read
Another example of not looking out for our seniors. Hud's new rule making borrowers pay for Reverse mortgage counseling even if th...
Read
The legislation powers are barking up the wrong tree. It comes about as to why people are using their home equity values instead o...
Read
Home - Contact - Sitemap - Disclaimer - Privacy Statement - Advertising
All Content Copyright © 2003 - 2008 Brown House Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form without the express written permission of MortgageNewsDaily.com is prohibited.