Top News


Mortgage Rates
30 Yr FRM 5.32% -0.10%
15 Yr FRM 4.77% -0.10%
1 Yr ARM 4.94% 0.01%
5/1 Yr ARM 4.88% -0.11%
30 YR Tres 4.32% 0.00%
Fed Prime 3.25% 0.00%
Receive Free Email Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news and blog posts with our free News Alert Service.  Or if you are already a member, click here to login.

Senate ad hoc Committee Hammers out Housing Rescue Bill

   |     Print   |     Bookmark

With what surely passes as warp-speed on Capitol Hill, the Senate on Wednesday afternoon reached tentative bi-partisan accord on a wide-ranging housing bill.

On Tuesday afternoon the Senate voted 94-1 to move forward on legislation to help homeowners facing foreclosure. While there were still substantial differences between Democrats and Republicans on the content of such a bill, there was agreement that something needed to be done and, in the shadow of the $30 billion in assistance given to Bear Stearns last week, it needed to be done quickly. Senators Christopher Dodd (D-CT) and Richard Shelby (R-AL) Chairman and ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee were charged with hammering out a bill that the entire Senate could agree on and given a deadline of noon the next day (Wednesday) to do so.

Senate staffers worked through the night to meet the deadline and the revised bill will probably reach the Senate floor on Thursday. The bill retains little in direct aid to homeowners but does include a new standard property tax deduction of $1,000 for couples and $500 for individuals who do not itemize deductions on their tax returns.



If the legislation is adopted there will be a $7,000 one-year tax credit for purchasers of foreclosed home ' a compromise, the Democrats had proposed $15,000 over three years ' and $4 billion in grants to allow local governments to buy foreclosed property for resale or for use as low-income rentals.

The National Association of Home Builders has been asking for a change in the tax code which would allow builders to carry back current losses as deductions against taxes paid in earlier, more profitable years. This piece of economic stimulus is part of the proposed bill.

The bill also includes $10 billion in tax-exempt bonds for local housing agencies to refinance subprime loans and provide new mortgages for first-time home buyers and $100 million to expand counseling for homeowners at risk of defaulting on their loans.

Under the new bill the cap on mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) would be set at $550,000 in the most expensive real estate markets. The limit was temporarily raised in February as part of the economic stimulus package to $729,750. We assume that this lower limit will come into effect only after the higher temporary limit expires. The down payment required for FHA loans will be raised to 3.5 percent from the current 3 percent.

Several parts of the original bill did not survive bi-partisan negotiation. The most controversial of these is a proposal to change the bankruptcy code to allow judges to modify the terms of mortgages on primary homes. Republican legislators had strongly opposed this provision. Also missing is a plan to extend $300 to $400 billion in federally guaranteed mortgages to help homeowners facing rate resets or already in trouble with their mortgages to refinance. According to Senator Dodd, this proposal may find its way into separate legislation in the weeks ahead.

While the speed with which the new bill was hammered out bodes well for its passage, it is not all clear sailing. The proposals will be presented to the whole Senate where several amendments are already expected. Among them will be an attempt to put the bankruptcy code changes back in the bill and to restore both the $15,000 tax credit for buying foreclosed homes and an additional $100 million for homeowner counseling that was stripped out of the earlier bill.

There is also a chance that some fiscally conservative members will fight for pay-as-you-go to fund some of the tax breaks which would require $11 billion in tax increases, a provision guaranteed to set off a fight.

In whatever form the bill finally passes the Senate, assuming it does, it must be reconciled with the House version of the bill which was passed earlier and then be signed by the President. The White House's immediate reaction to the proposed legislation was friendly but did not offer any commitment that the President would accept all of the bill's provisions. According to a press representative there were concerns about the tax credit provision and the funding to the states to purchase foreclosed properties.


Comments

Join Now to Post Comments

punzah
on Sat, Apr 5 2008 7:00 AM
Back at the end of 2006, even before it started in earnest, everybody familiar with the mortgage world agreed there would be a big problem when subprime ARMs started to have rate resets unless they could be refinanced. So what did the bank regulators do? The "Interagency Group" issued new lending "Guidance" that guaranteed that practically no subprime ARM could be refinanced. Very soon after that the investors in mortgage securities realized what was going to happen as a result, and the subprime paper became worthless almost instantly. That started a snowball effect leading to leading to a very general housing market collapse plus a worldwide credit crisis way beyond what anybody feared. Everybody still agrees that the crisis is still firmly rooted in the problems with subprime ARMs, so it is totally astounding that there still has not been one single proposal that I can find to compel changes in the toxic terms of those ARMs, either existing ones or possible future ones (there may not be future ones, since there are practically no subprime ARMs available that remotely resemble the ones that are now in trouble, and there are practically no subprime lenders left, and certainly no subprime investors). Instead of dealing directly with the toxic terms of subprime ARMs, what have the regulators and lawmakers done? They've attacked mortgage brokers, who are little more to blame for the general crisis than a clerk at McD's is who sells a bad burger from a bad batch of meat is responsible for a general outbreak of food poisoning, thrown hundreds of billlions of dollars of taxpayer money to bail out the banks and investors (the new Term Securities Lending Facitlity where the Fed lends Treasuries in exchange for mortgage obligations), and incentivized unfeasible refinances and future home buying. Any attempt to encourage refinances of subprime ARMs are in vain, only a miniscule fraction of them qualify to be refinanced due to the loss of equity, fewer applicable loan programs, way fewer lenders, and much stiffer guidelines for conforming and Alt-A loans. FHASecure could only help an estimated 240,000 out of the approximately two milllion subprime ARMs that are in trouble. The entire thrust of changes at Fannie and Feddie has been to make loans harder to get in the future. Efforts in the private sector, in particular the HopeNow alliance have been somewhat effective, but are too slow and piecemeal, and in most cases haven't solved the problem of restructuring the loans, they've just created a payoff plan to repay the exhoribant interest that was charged. The crisis can be solved in one bold sweep of the pen without costing the taxpayer one cent, and would not only rescue all the subprime defaults, but restore value to all the mortgage securities, and most likely stop or even reverse the decline of housing values. Either Congress or the President can use the power they have as confirmed by the Supreme Court in 1934 (Home Building and Loan, Ltd. versus Blaisdell) to intervene in mortgage contracts when the public welfare is at stake. To end the crisis declare a six month suspension of foreclosures caused by late payments of ARMs after their rates reset, change the terms of existing subprime ARMs by fiat, and legislate reasonable limits on the terms of future ARMs. The existing ARMs should be reset to a rate that is the lower of either 1.5% over the original start rate, or 8.5%, and that should be fixed for three years. The margin would be changed to 4%. Future adjustments would be limited to 2% initial, 0.5% every six months, or 1% per year, 5% total, and the rate should be limited to 8.5% during the first year of adjustment. Payments already made since the first rate reset in excess of the newly limited rate should be credited to either principal or to future interest payments, allowing the borrower payment holidays until the next regualr payment is due. Future ARMs should be limited to three years minimum fixed rate period if the rate will adjust every six months, or two years if the rate will adjust once per year. Limit initial adjustment to 2%, periodic adjustments to no more than 0.5% per six months or 1% per year, total rate adjustment to 5%. The margin should be limited to 4%. Do not allow interest only payments for loans that have fixed rate periods less than five years. Do not allow prepayment penalties on that expire less than 120 days before the first reset, and have such federal rules or statutes supercede the patchwork quilt of unconstitutional state laws that inhibit interstate commerce. The President could achieve the emergency foreclosure moratorium and contract changes using his existing power to declare an economic emergency. Alternatively, Congress could do the same. Limits on the terms of future ARMs should be put into statute and be administered by the Fed under Reg Z. The foregoing would instantly restore value to the subprime mortgage secuities.