Mortgage News Home

Friday May 16, 2008

Home Page   24,327 Active Members   Register Welcome, Guest    Sign In  

Home

Latest Headlines

Popular Stories

Bookmark Us

Reader Comments

SUBSCRIBE

SEARCH OUR SITE

RSS News

Mortgage Rates
  30 Yr Fix 6.01% -0.04%
  15 Yr Fix 5.60% 0.00%
  1 Yr ARM 5.18% -0.11%
  5/1 ARM 5.57% -0.10%
  30 Yr Tres 4.58% -0.06%
  Fed Prime 5.00% -0.25%
MND Features

- Wiki
- Video News
- Mortgage License Information
- Real Estate License Information
- Mortgage Content Syndication
- Mortgage Fraud
- Housing Bubble
News Archives

Submit A News Tip
or Story Idea
 

Free Subscription To News Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news with our free News Alert Service.


Wachovia Settles One Suit, Confronts Money Laundering Charges

4336 Views - Printer Friendly - Email This Story To A Friend
 
RSS COMMENTS(1) LINK HERE ADD NEWS TO YOUR WEBSITE

Wachovia Corporation, the rising Charlotte North Carolina banking star is having a very bad April.

On April 14 the bank announced it had lost $350 million or $0.20 per share during the first quarter of 2008. The losses, which were much higher than had been expected, were due primarily, or course, to problems in the mortgage markets.

Then this past Friday Wachovia got hit with a double whammy.

In the morning it was announced that Wachovia Corp. had agreed to a settlement with The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) of as much a $144 million to end an 18 month investigation into its role in a telemarketing scheme that allegedly affected between 350,000 and 500,000 Wachovia customers, many of them elderly.


The OCC was investigating claims that the bank, over an approximate period of June 2003 to December 2006, had relationships with several telemarketers and payment processing companies that had marketed identity-theft certificates, discount travel vouchers, and other products or services, targeting a largely elderly and/or low-income clientele. The telemarketers obtained bank account information from respondents and used it to draw up a "remotely created check" which doesn't require a signature. These remotely created checks would then be deposited into the telemarketing companies' Wachovia accounts and Wachovia would withdraw the funds from the consumers' bank accounts. Consumers frequently complained that they did not authorize the withdrawals or did not receive the services/merchandise ordered.

The OCC alleged that some Wachovia officials were aware of the telemarketing practices but failed to take quick action to resolve the problem but instead profited from the relationship because of fees collected and balances maintained in the telemarketers' and payment processors' Wachovia accounts.

Two class action suits have also been filed against Wachovia in the matter.

The settlement, a record for the OCC, includes as much as $125 in restitution to consumers harmed in the telemarketing schemes and $8.9 million toward consumer education for the elderly. There will also be a $10 fine.

The settlement is the kind of thing that corporate public relations departments dread, but the news was out and the spin had begun ("This situation was unacceptable and we regret it happened." "We will work diligently to provide restitution to consumers affected by the situation and to educate consumers.") when late Friday The Wall Street Journal (on-line) published a story headlined "Wachovia Is Under Scrutiny In Latin Drug-Money Probe."

According to the Journal story, federal prosecutors are investigating the bank as part of "a broad probe of alleged laundering of drug proceeds by Mexican and Colombian money-transfer companies."

The investigation is focusing on money-exchange houses (casas de cambio) which are set up along the U.S.-Mexico border to assist cross-border transfers of money which can include legitimate transactions such as workers' remittances. These transfers are estimated to amount to more than $50 billion from the U.S. to Latin America every year and there is much money to be made from the high fees that are charged. While, as stated, most of the remittances are from aliens, both resident and illegal, sending wages home to family members, it is also a superhighway for narcotics traffickers to move the proceeds of U.S. drug sales to Latin America.

Wachovia hoped to use casas de cambio as an entrée´ to the legitimate Hispanic market. It held the foreign-exchange houses' deposits and provided back-office services. In 2005, it introduced the Dinero Directo card to facilitate cross-border remittances.

Wachovia was apparently warned by the law enforcement community that the casas de cambio were sometimes used to launder drug money and, as early as the mid-1990s, U.S. regulators and drug investigators were warning U.S. banks that Mexican casas de cambio presented a significant money-laundering risk.

However, if the current allegations are true, this would not be Wachovia's first brush with money laundering problems. The Journal states that internal emails and documents filed in federal courts in Miami, Chicago and New York describe former ties between Wachovia and money-changing firms. "In a case in U.S. court in Miami, federal agents seized more than $11 million in 23 Wachovia accounts belonging to Casa de Cambio Puebla, a Mexican chain. U.S. and Mexican prosecutors said they believed the money was being laundered, according to legal papers filed by Puebla. Mexican police raided Puebla offices last fall, alleging relationships with a major drug cartel." An attorney for the owners of Puebla, said the money seized belongs to legitimate clients.

An official of Wachovia told WSJ it is cooperating in the probe. Wachovia and some other U.S. banks severed relationships with Mexican foreign-exchange firms late in 2007 as the investigation began. Some institutions have struck agreements with the government to improve their efforts to fight money laundering, avoiding prosecution.



Story Views: 4336 | Permalink

Story Tools



Email This Story To A Friend

Subscribe To News Alerts
 

Related Tags

Select a Tag for more information related to that Tag. (View All Tags)
 
wachovia wachovia probe class action lawsuits money laundering

 

Comments (1)

Post Comment Comments RSS


On the telemarketing/elder abuse 144 million - at the end did that say $10 fine - was it a typo? Isn't it more like a 10 million fine?

Above Posted By: Susan | Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:22:56 EST


Post A Comment

Please fill out the form below to submit a comment.

Name: 
(Required - Type Anonymous or Use First Name Only if Private)
Email Address: 
(Not Required So No Fake Emails Please.)
URL or Weblog:
(Leave Blank If You Don't Have One - Use http://)
Comments: 
(Please keep comments on topic. No HTML Allowed. No Advertisng.)
Please Note: Due to Comment Spam, all comments are reviewed by hand. Most comments will appear shortly after submission but it may take up to 12 hours to appear. If you would like to come back, click here to Bookmark the page.
PLEASE DO NOT USE ALL CAPS


Character Count =     (5000 Character Limit)

If you would like to leave a longer comment, please submit your comments in 5000 character increments and we will merge your comments.
Notify me via email when my comment is approved.


Note: Please don't bother spamming. All submissions are reviewed by our our editorial staff. Comment spam and irrelevant links will not be approved.

 



NEW VIDEO
(4 New Today)
NEW! A New Civil War in Banking
NEW! Atlanta Fed President on Banking


Reader Comments (More)
Warranties are ripoffs. Everyone in Sales knows that. They're designed to create extra income for the company and a little extra i...
Read
The formalization of the short pay is HUGE. Many borrowers in interest only loans would like to refinance but with no equity in th...
Read
We bought our home Jan 08 and our realtor recommended AHS as the best warranty coverage. Yesterday I tried turning on the central ...
Read
Home - Contact - Sitemap - Disclaimer - Privacy Statement - Advertising
All Content Copyright © 2003 - 2008 Brown House Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form without the express written permission of MortgageNewsDaily.com is prohibited.