Top News


Mortgage Rates
30 Yr FRM 5.32% -0.10%
15 Yr FRM 4.77% -0.10%
1 Yr ARM 4.94% 0.01%
5/1 Yr ARM 4.88% -0.11%
30 YR Tres 4.32% 0.00%
Fed Prime 3.25% 0.00%
Receive Free Email Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news and blog posts with our free News Alert Service.  Or if you are already a member, click here to login.

Senate Moves To Assist Homeowners On Two Fronts

   |     Print   |     Bookmark

The Senate Banking Committee and one of its subcommittees dealt this week, however superficially, with two issues that should be of interest to a lot of homeowners. Hopefully these won't be problems that they have just teed up and then punted into obscurity. Both are worthy of discussion if not action.

Chris Dodd, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and Charles Schumer, Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee both made statements on April 11. Dodd was concerned with homeowners' insurance issues, especially on the gulf coast but certain to not be limited to that area while Schumer was seeking relief for homeowners in the midst of the subprime mess.



Senator Dodd, in an opening statement before a hearing on "Availability and Affordability of Property and Casualty Insurance in the Gulf Coast and Other Coastal Regions" expressed concern that insurance coverage is becoming increasingly difficult to obtain or afford in many coastal areas. Insurers, he said, are pulling out of high-risk areas and others are dropping coverage such as for windstorm damage. Even where coverage is available, rates and deductions are rising to the brink of unaffordable.

Dodd, quoting from a Chicago Tribune article told of a funeral home owner along Mississippi's Gulf Coast who saw his pre-Katrina insurance premiums of $61,224 for $7 million in coverage skyrocket post-storm to $781,000. Unable to handle that amount he reduced his coverage to $2 million for which he is paying $122,113 each year. He also referred to a Palm Beach Post news story about a local resident who opened her windstorm insurance renewal notice to find that her premium has increased by 194 percent to $7,443.

Citing the numerous hurricanes along the Gulf and Atlantic Coasts, the Northridge earthquake, wildfires throughout the west, and the North Dakota Red River floods, Dodd said that the lack of affordable insurance is increasingly a problem for homeowners throughout the country. Many states, he said, have attempted to address the problem by, for example, setting up high risk pools but the states cannot be expected to handle the problem on their own. Instead this is a problem deserving of national solutions which must be crafted to make sure that Americans have access to affordable insurance but that taxpayers are not burdened by "the risk of losses that are properly borne by insurers and re-insurers."

The Senator proposed four steps that Congress and the Administration should take to provide relief for homeowners and businesses in the coastal areas of the nation.

  • Tax deductions should be provided for homeowners for insurance premiums in areas where those premiums have seen significant increases. Deductions should be available to working and middle income families and be capped individually and also nationally so as not to exceed $100 million each year.
  • The country should increase investment in mitigation activities above the $100 million currently provided by FEMA to help communities to address the risk of loss to their residents. Mitigation funding should at least double so that homeowners can strengthen their homes and communities or relocate to higher ground.
  • The National Flood Insurance Program should be strengthened and put on strong financial footing. This federal program is now $20 billion in debt to the U.S. Treasury.
  • Additional information should be gathered to aid in the consideration of longer-term solutions.

Dodd's remarks did not include any comment on the thousands of homeowners whose claims have been rejected by insurance companies, particularly where those claims include hurricane damage.

Senator Schumer released a congressional study about the current problems in the subprime lending industry. The report by the Joint Economic Committee said that foreclosures in the subprime sector are expected to rise over the next two years as nearly 2 million hybrid adjustable rate mortgages hit their reset dates.

Schumer said that he and others would be proposing that "hundreds of millions of dollars" of federal funds would be directed to helping community-based groups work with borrowers to avert foreclosures. The report also urged that underwriting rules be strengthened on the federal level and that standards for the education and licensing of mortgage lenders be established.

It will be interesting to see if any congressional action arises out of these reports and hearings and, should any occur, if it will be in the form of bailing out insurance companies and lenders or putting in place some real reforms to insure that corporations can not longer just take the money and run.


Comments

Join Now to Post Comments

Anonymous
on Mon, Apr 16 2007 7:00 AM
Lets take this opportunity to allow people to learn, readjust to new financial issues, and take care of themselves through counceling and payment deferral programs should they want the opportunity to do so.
Are you kidding?
on Mon, Apr 16 2007 7:00 AM
Loan programs have been created to the max to falsely extend the housing market that has been trying to slow down on its own for sometime now. What do you expect from no money down, 55% back ratio, 25% overvalued appraisal loans? When the market slows to a crawl perhaps there will be a subsidy or supplemental program for me and my industry peers? I get a feeling the answer is NO!
Anonymous
on Mon, Apr 16 2007 7:00 AM
Markets have cycles. There are peak cycles and low cycles in every industry in the economy. Reset rates were not predicted to go this high. Homeownership is a right for any American that wants to own. I encourage it for the long-term and short term. Allowing people to hold RE to obtain equity on the long haul for retirement is one reason. Takes some of the burden off of government. On the bright side, nowhere in history have we had this much increased home ownership.
Anonymous
on Mon, Apr 16 2007 7:00 AM
Do not waste my tax money on bailing out fat cats(insurance industry) and greedy investors! As for the lenders, if you create a program to lure unqualified borrower then take the loss and don't complain. The working stiffs like me is the real victim. It seems that we have lost accoutability and integrity along the way. Stop the congress play politics and do some real jobs. We should stop free hand out. Isn't there a saying that " there is no free lunch in American"?
Sick and tired
on Mon, Apr 16 2007 7:00 AM
Congress is not only bailing out the homeowners who deserve to lose their homes since they took extreme risks (and fraud) to live above their means. This is a bailout for the predatory lenders who made it so easy for greedy people to get in this mess. Not on my tax dollar!!!!! I am a realtor and have been shaking my head for almost 3 years. This was inevitable. A bailout will punish people who live within their means and reward the greedy. Wake up voters!
amika
on Mon, Apr 16 2007 7:00 AM
Right! Wake upvoters indeed. Congress is nothing more than a den of thieves pandering to whomever will get them re-elected. Review the history and why corporate bailouts have continued. (i.e. Chrysler, Lee Iacocca) Our currency is worthless ink on paper and our laws are confiscatory. They'll transfer your wealth while you sleep.
Publius
on Tue, Apr 17 2007 7:00 AM
Pandering will not solve the problem. Homeowners need to become educated and exercise basic common sense. You cannot afford a home if you falsely 'state' your income is higher, the loan still needs to be repaid! You have an OptionArm that allows you to afford a home well beyond your means because of the intro rate? The reset rates were not expected to go this high you say? But you knew it was a possibility! You dug the hole, don't expect the erudite to bail you out with their tax dollars.
Publius
on Tue, Apr 17 2007 7:00 AM
On Insurance, I don't even want to get started there. There is a reason insurance is higher in disaster prone areas, because of the disasters (common sense once again). You live in a flood zone, tornado alley or a coastal area prone to typhoons and hurricanes and expect your fellow citizens to subsidize you? If you decide to move to Mars should we insure that as well?

They should teach this stuff in high school, but I digress. Wake up, smell the coffee (no lattes please), the American dream will always be just that if you think you will get something for nothing.
Publius
on Tue, Apr 17 2007 7:00 AM
Lenders are also to blame. Their greed fueled the makeup of these loan products to begin with. If there is $$ to be made Wall St. will create a market for it, so they did (and still do). The 'sheeple' (sheep-people) have memories only as long as the front page of the newspaper or whatever drivel is fed to them nightly by the "Couric-esquians". Offering the under qualified and over extended false hope is hardly anything to be commended on. Unfortunatley, the 'sheeple' followed the herdsman.

We went through this same sub-prime tightening in the late 90's after similar loose underwriting and 125 LTV products were introduced. It was said previously that "On the bright side, nowhere in history have we had this much increased home ownership." Have you stopped to think that the reason more people didn't own a home was because they couldn't afford one in the 1st place?
Reality
on Wed, Apr 18 2007 7:00 AM
Lenders earn fees on homes in foreclosure. All of these expenses are added onto the loan balance.The only time they lose money is when the become too agressive with their equity stripping programs. Should tax payers eliminate the downside risk?