Mortgage News Home

Monday October 13, 2008

Home Page   28,684 Active Members   Register Welcome, Guest    Sign In  

Home

Latest Headlines

Popular Stories

Bookmark Us

Reader Comments

SUBSCRIBE

SEARCH OUR SITE

RSS News

Mortgage Rates
  30 Yr Fix 5.94% -0.16%
  15 Yr Fix 5.63% -0.15%
  1 Yr ARM 5.15% 0.03%
  5/1 ARM 5.90% -0.10%
  30 Yr Tres 4.06% 0.03%
  Fed Prime 5.00% -0.25%
MND Features

- Wiki
- Video News
- Mortgage License Information
- Real Estate License Information
- Mortgage Content Syndication
- Mortgage Fraud
- Housing Bubble
News Archives

Submit A News Tip
or Story Idea
 

Free Subscription To News Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news with our free News Alert Service.


Can Saving PMI Also Save the Economy? Cramer Thinks So

5376 Views - Printer Friendly - Email This Story To A Friend
 
RSS COMMENTS(4) LINK HERE ADD NEWS TO YOUR WEBSITE

Wall Street has been gyrating as it considers the Bush Administration's proposed economic stimulus plan and the Democrat controlled Congress's response to it. The plan is largely based on tax cuts for businesses and small cash rebates to individuals and families which Washington apparently hopes will be quickly spent rather than saved or used to pay down debt.

What is clearly missing in the current proposals is any mention of the terrible state of housing which started the current economic slide. Even if it doesn't single-handedly cause any recession that develops, it will certainly have been a major player.


There are a dozen places that the government could plug in and stimulate the housing/lending industry. The NAR recommended last week that the conventional lending limit imposed on Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae be raised by some $200,000 and the FHA reform bill which has been kicking around Congress for some time be quickly passed.

The GSEs themselves (Fannie and Freddie) have asked that their portfolio limits be raised temporarily so they might fund more loans and warehouse them until the secondary market improves enough to absorb the surplus.

There have been suggestions from other quarters that the government agree to guarantee some types of loans to aid in loosening up credit, but none of these suggestions seemed to have gained much traction with the Administration although members of Congress have endorsed a few of them. There seems to be a refusal on the part of the administration to "reward" borrowers and lenders for irresponsible behavior, no matter what the larger cost may be to the economy.

One of the more creative ideas for economic stimulus came late last week from Jim (Mad Money) Cramer who laid out his "Game Plan for Saving the U.S. Economy." His basic premise is that, with banks already taking such a beating because of their investments in sub-prime mortgages, if the insurers who backed these loans fail, there will be no bottom for bank stocks and thus the entire system would collapse. Therefore, Cramer concludes, the government needs to buy these private insurers.

He is talking about the companies such as MGIC and PMI which write the private insurance on residential mortgages with less than 80 percent loan to value and companies like Ambac that guarantee bonds, particularly municipal bonds. Cramer proposes that the insurance policies covering municipal bonds could be sold to Warren Buffett or the highest bidder while Washington would guarantee the insurance on loans at $.50 on the dollar. At most, even if every insured loan, some $500 billion worth, defaulted, the economy could be saved for a mere $250 billion. And, he added, most likely no more than half of the $500 billion would need to be covered.

Following this course of action the Mad Money Man says, would give the economy the certainty it needs. The banks that have been hard hit by sub-prime loses such as Citigroup, Countrywide Financial, and Merrill Lynch could measure their losses, build up their reserves and get back to the business of lending. Add a one point Federal interest rate cut above and beyond this plan and Cramer says the Dow would add 2,000 points in two weeks. Failure to follow the plan might lead to "the end of the world - or at least another 2,000 point decline in the market."

Scary scenario, but is he totally out in left field?

In a November Associated Press article credited to WJLA television, leading PMI insurer MGIC Investment Corporation admitted that they won't turn a profit again until 2009. The company has issued $196.6 billion in policies against individual home mortgages and by November 2007 had paid out $586 million in claims and expected to have a total payout of $875 million by the end of the year.

Industry wide there was a total of $776 billion in private mortgage insurance in force as of last September. The industry trade group, Mortgage Insurance Companies of America said that about 10 percent of the total mortgage loan market is subject to PMI. It felt, at that point that its members would face claims of between $1.2 billion and $1.5 billion in 2008, about twice the claims in 2006.

Another major insurer, PMI Group, saw its quarterly claims (apparently third quarter) rise 49 percent to $92.6 million and Radian Group lost $703.9 million in the same time period after write-downs and losses from subprime mortgages suffered through a joint venture with MGIC.

By the end of the year things were looking even dicier. Mark Anderson reporting in the Sacramento Business Journal on New Year's Eve stated that the default rate on privately insured mortgages rose in November to the highest level since the Mortgage Insurance Companies began keeping records. The industry trade group reported that 61,300 insured borrowers were at least 60 days late on payments by the end of that month, 35.2 percent more than were delinquent one year earlier and the first time the number had topped 60,000 since record-keeping began in 2001.

None of this means that the PMI insurers are about to go under. Some carry heavy cash reserves and groups such as the Mortgage Bankers Association seem to feel that the safety net is secure. We are just saying...

And those bond insurers such as Ambac are also facing problems. Ambac lost an AAA credit rating from Fitch last week and both Ambac and MBIA are facing additional review of their credit ratings by Moody's and Standard & Poor's. Each of the insurers have announced their intention to raise capital to keep or reinstate their AAA ratings but Ambac Friday ditched a proposed equity and equity-linked sale through which it had hoped to raise $1 billion.

Back to our original premise and one with which we think Cramer, and NAR, and maybe even Wall Street might agree. The President and Treasury Secretary Paulson should ditch the idea of giving away $800 lollipops to consumers and look at some of the underlying problems in the housing and credit markets.



Story Views: 5376 | Permalink

Story Tools



Email This Story To A Friend

Subscribe To News Alerts
 

Related Tags

Select a Tag for more information related to that Tag. (View All Tags)
 

 

Comments (4)

Post Comment Comments RSS


Open Letter to George Bush and to anyone who will take time to read this!

The Honorable George Bush -President of the United States

Dear Mr. President,
It's with respect for the office of the presidency, I write this letter.  I believe, as well as many others, who are of the same opinion, that the stimulus package which you proposed a couple of days ago could possible have some merit, if that stimulus created an incentive to get people to work. Created meaningful jobs. not the minimum wage type, but real paying jobs.

Putting the nation into more debt without any sizeable contribution to growth can lead us unto more unemployment, and turbulent times not only for us, but also the entire world community.

It's important to keep us out of recession. It makes no sense to put us in more debt, without creating a real stimulus package to put people to work, and grow the economy.  Too much debt, takes it's toll, ultimately it may create pandemonium throughout the world's economies.

We have far too much debt, in order for the United States to be in the growth mode, it needs real teeth in an economic stimulus package is to create real Jobs.  To point out a few examples of this:

1.  Americans are losing good paying jobs to foreign countries, as of such, why not put before congress a tax rebate or credit that rewards U.S. taxpayers for buying products that are made up at least 51% that are produced here in the United States. 

2.  Energy efficiency should be rewarded to taxpayers in the form of a credit or rebate as a stimulus to reduce our dependency on foreign oil.

3.  Credit those automakers that Increase the Standards for fuel efficiency vehicles, ultimately increasing the mileage per gallon, thus reducing fuel consumption, as well as tax credit or rebate those taxpayers who purchase energy efficient cars and trucks, beyond the current credit or repate now being paid as a deduction.

4.  Credit energy companies for Research and develop crude oil and natural gas here in the United States, as well, as explore other fuel alternatives to shake us from foreign oil interest. 

5.  Increase the Conforming Loan Limits in states like California, which exceed the average median home prices that of states like Alaska, Hawaii, and the Virgin Islands.  It makes no sense to why Mr. Lochard is refusing to acknowledge that California is a high cost state. The conforming loan limit for FannieMae and FreddieMac is set at $417,000.  California median price has been more than $500,000.  Most of the lenders that have been affected by the so called credit crunch, subprime debacle really stems from actions by the Federal Reserve acting to slow in adjusting the fed funds rate, hanging out to dry many lending institutions, such as countrywide for example.

  Now that the federal reserve has lowered the Fed Funds and Discount rate by .75 basis points, the only thing stopping the economy from moving foreword is the raising of the Conforming Loan Limits.  This should get the country back on the positive track.

I am forwarding this letter to the Federal Reserve Chairman, as well a few Congressional leaders as well as a few key senators.  I thank you in advance.

  Very truly yours,

Carlos R. Arvizu Sr.

Above Posted By: Carlos | Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:39:59 EST

Government (meaning taxpayers) should take the loses so that the banks and insurers that hoarded multibillion billion dollar profits by reckless lending / insuring practices can get of the hook? Let them go out of business. Painful, but will avoid a similar bubble in the future. These bubbles are happening all the time precisely because big business thinks it is too big to fall. Yes, give instead lollipops to people.

Above Posted By: Peter | Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:52:57 EST

I completely disagree with you and Cramer's solution, which is a bailout for lenders such as Countrywide, WaMu, etc. These lenders engaged in reckless, irresponsible loan-criteria behavior. The very last thing I want is for them to "get back" to lending. Some of them need to "get out of business" (go bankrupt or be bought out) and some others need to face civil and criminal prosecutions for fraud. There's a funny thing I've noticed about many advocates of the "free market": when they do well, they're ready to rake in the rewards of capitalism, when they fail, they pay low-lifes like Angelo Mozilo $115 million for the economic chaos they create and then want taxpayers to bail them out. Let Mozilo bail out Countrywide now that he's sucked it dry.

Above Posted By: Monique Bryher | Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:05:10 EST

I had just mentioned this looming problem yesterday in a comment I posted regarding the the Fed's emergency rate decrease... Thank you for posting this, the American public needs to know what Washington insiders are not telling them.

Above Posted By: Andrew Snyder | Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:23:21 EST


Post A Comment

Please fill out the form below to submit a comment.

Name: 
(Required - Type Anonymous or Use First Name Only if Private)
Email Address: 
(Not Required So No Fake Emails Please.)
URL or Weblog:
(Leave Blank If You Don't Have One - Use http://)
Comments: 
(Please keep comments on topic. No HTML Allowed. No Advertisng.)
Please Note: Due to Comment Spam, all comments are reviewed by hand. Most comments will appear shortly after submission but it may take up to 12 hours to appear. If you would like to come back, click here to Bookmark the page.
PLEASE DO NOT USE ALL CAPS


Character Count =     (5000 Character Limit)

If you would like to leave a longer comment, please submit your comments in 5000 character increments and we will merge your comments.
Notify me via email when my comment is approved.


Note: Please don't bother spamming. All submissions are reviewed by our our editorial staff. Comment spam and irrelevant links will not be approved.

 




NEW VIDEO
(3 New Today)
NEW! The Big Plan
NEW! Plunge Protection


Reader Comments (More)
As Realtor I applaud the move to stabilize markets and confidence as this affects my livelihood but will this just bail out banks ...
Read
Another good informative article. Keep up the good work MND. My overall opinion is that this takeover is harmful to us as individu...
Read
It seems to me that possibly the people with Freddie Mac finally admit there is a problem of a legal nature with most "sub-prime" ...
Read
Home - Contact - Sitemap - Disclaimer - Privacy Statement - Advertising
All Content Copyright © 2003 - 2008 Brown House Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form without the express written permission of MortgageNewsDaily.com is prohibited.