Mortgage News Home

Sunday July 20, 2008

Home Page   26,235 Active Members   Register Welcome, Guest    Sign In  

Home

Latest Headlines

Popular Stories

Bookmark Us

Reader Comments

SUBSCRIBE

SEARCH OUR SITE

RSS News

Mortgage Rates
  30 Yr Fix 6.37% 0.02%
  15 Yr Fix 5.91% -0.01%
  1 Yr ARM 5.17% 0.00%
  5/1 ARM 5.82% 0.04%
  30 Yr Tres 4.47% -0.05%
  Fed Prime 5.00% -0.25%
MND Features

- Wiki
- Video News
- Mortgage License Information
- Real Estate License Information
- Mortgage Content Syndication
- Mortgage Fraud
- Housing Bubble
News Archives

Submit A News Tip
or Story Idea
 

Free Subscription To News Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news with our free News Alert Service.


Dont Be "Pound Foolish" About Real Estate Commissions

16682 Views - Printer Friendly - Email This Story To A Friend
 
RSS COMMENTS(11) LINK HERE ADD NEWS TO YOUR WEBSITE

Everybody wants a deal and, home sellers seem to particularly want one when it comes to paying a real estate commission. People who don't blink at paying their attorney $275 per hour get just a little crazy when confronted with a five, six, or seven percent commission. Most agents know that "what do you charge" will be one of the first questions a prospective seller will ask.

While local areas have "typical" or "average" commissions, these are certainly negotiable (if they were not, it would be considered price fixing,) and it never hurts to try. After all, even a half percent cut in the commission on a 300,000 sale means a lot more cash, $1,500 in fact, in the check the attorney hands you at closing. But, before you try to cut a deal, there are some questions you should ask the agent and yourself.


1. What services will I get for my money?

"You get what you pay for" isn't necessarily a cliché. If the agent is a "kitchen broker", literally operating alone and out of her home, she can well afford to cut a six percent commission down to four. She doesn't have the overhead of a real office - rent, a sophisticated phone system, secretarial support, professionally designed marketing materials, a name brand, and probably not much of an advertising budget. Even franchises with big names but small offices will come up short on some of these services.

You need to ask:

-Are your phones manned by real people during normal business hours and especially on weekends?

That Sunday newspaper ad won't do much good if there is no one available to answer a prospect's questions or to schedule showings for cooperating agents. The latter is especially critical. Real estate agents often have a very short time frame to schedule multiple showings over complicated routes. If no one answers the phone and confirms a showing, it just won't happen.

-Where and how often will you advertise my house?

Advertising is a major expense. While television ads, spreads in glossy magazines, and insertions in prestigious national publications such as The Wall Street Journal are less about marketing an individual property than promoting the real estate company's image, the local paper and nearby metropolitan papers are key to marketing a home. An agent should be willing to commit to an ad in whichever paper serves as the local real estate marketplace at least once a week for a few months and every other week after that. The agent should also be willing to rewrite and "freshen" the ad on a regular basis.

And, no matter how low the commission, make sure that your agent is a member of all relevant local multiple listing services (there may be more than one in your area) and that your home will be promptly entered into those data bases.

2. What split will you be offering?

Listing agents split their commission with the agent who secures a valid buyer. This is usually a 50/50 proposition, but it doesn't have to be. Theoretically the selling agent could be paid $1.00, but then why would he show your house? Like everyone, agents are financially driven, and, all things being equal are likely to show and promote those listings with a higher split. If an agent cuts his commission to obtain your listing, insist that the discount come from his share so that cooperating agents are offered a commission competitive in the area. Where the prevailing commission is five percent, an agent willing to list your home for 4.5 percent should take two, offering 2.5% to cooperating agents. Referral fees are becoming more and more of an issue for agents. If your company, alma mater, or even the discount warehouse where you shop, offers an "affinity" program that will give you special incentives for listing with an agent they refer, that agent will pay a healthy piece (as much as 35-40%) of his commission to the affinity program for providing access to you. Other referrals from relocation companies or out-of-area brokers (even your retired neighbor who keeps her license active and knows "the nicest agent") require at least a 20% cut of your agent's commission.

The agent accepting a referral should absorb those fees, not pass any part through to the cooperating agent. Again, a lower "split" is a disincentive to showing your house, and realistically, why should anyone else pay your agent's marketing expenses?

As an aside, if you are taking advantage of an affinity program, it is really unfair to also ask for commission concessions. Everyone needs to make a living. Decide up front if you want to try to negotiate a commission or get the cash back at closing offered by the program.

The split is always displayed on the "internal" multiple listing sheet for agents (not the public one setting on your dining room table or passed out to buyers.) Insist upon seeing this sheet after your house is listed to be sure the split is the equitable one you and the agent agreed upon.

Another question to ask, even if the agent is unwilling to offer a lower commission up front is "Will you reduce the commission if you sell the house yourself?"

Trick question! The answer should be a resounding NO, and if the agent suggests such a scenario first, escort him, graciously but immediately, to the door.

Think about it. You are hiring an agent to market your house, not to sell it. You want it exposed to the largest possible pool of buyers, not to the limited number your agent may be able to produce on his own. Now do the math. If you are paying a five percent commission, your agent will probably collect 2.5%. But if he can collect four percent for managing both ends of the transaction, he has a real incentive to cut back on efforts to motivate other agents, delay putting the house into multiple listing, even to play games with offers presented by other agents.

3. Now, ask yourself a question.

As house prices escalated, commissions declined. Six to seven percent used to be pretty universal, but in many high priced communities, four percent is now the norm. Good agents have many expenses - association dues, errors and omissions insurance, multiple listing and lock box fees, advertising and promotional expenses, cell phones, and automobile costs - which are constant whether they sell a house or not. Not your problem you may say, but before you negotiate too ruthlessly, ask yourself this:

Do want your agent to be enthusiastic about selling your house or do you want him treating your listing as a bad deal he got suckered into?



Story Views: 16682 | Permalink

Story Tools



Email This Story To A Friend

Subscribe To News Alerts
 

Related Tags

Select a Tag for more information related to that Tag. (View All Tags)
 

 

Comments (11)

Post Comment Comments RSS


I would like to know what an agent does differently to market a $500,000 house vs. a $200,000 house. Commissions should be on a sliding scale based upon the value of the house and also whether or not it is in a desirable area and would possibly sell quickly vs. a long time. If I have a crappy property that I need to sell QUICKLY, then I'd fully expect to pay 6%.

Above Posted By: Sheila | Sun, 6 Jul 2008 13:17:15 EST

If you are selling a house for $4,000,000 why should a commission be 6%? It should be at the most 2%. Right?

Above Posted By: Anonymus | Wed, 28 May 2008 14:07:59 EST

Agents get nothing unless the property sells. Why would one even consider asking the brokerage to cut their commission if the only time they get paid is when the property sells! You pay nothing up front yet the agent takes a risk spending their own time and money with no guarentee. Generally property doesn't sell because its either over priced or not desirable. Commission should never be negotiated if the seller isn't willing to price the house as per the current areas market.

Above Posted By: C | Wed, 23 May 2007 06:48:57 EST

Mike no I don't think your statement justifies. I agree with Janice. A seller is paying the commission for you to do all the things you state, not for a realtor to give away their hard won equity.

Above Posted By: Karyn | Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:51:08 EST

Your author is wrong when it comes to the question "will you offer a reduced commission if you sell the house yourself". Doesn't your author understand that the Seller commits to paying a certain percentage, lets say 6%, no matter who sells the home. If the Seller doesn't ask his agent to reduce the percentage if his agent procures the buyer, then the agent will get the entire 6%. As far as the agent not marketing the home as well because he thinks he will get paid more, that is just crap.

Above Posted By: Laura | Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:45:13 EST

In Marin County and Sonoma Valley the number of homes being sold is down by over 30%. However, the average sales price is maintaining. That said we have a lot of inventory for buyers to choose from due in large part to unreasonable sellers that don't realize that they missed the market when you could ask for anything at all, and get it. When you are selling your home it needs to look better, and be priced less, than the competition. If it is truly a value, there will be mulitple offers.

Above Posted By: Kelley | Sat, 22 Jul 2006 15:20:16 EST

Right, Janice...so then your logic dictates that if the house sells quickly and at a strong price or one over the asking price and follow-up and communication are good, then agents should get a bonus on top of their commission fee, right?

Above Posted By: Mike | Sat, 1 Jul 2006 16:56:44 EST

Meeting with three listing agents is a good idea, but keep in mind that one method employed to get your listing is to suggest you could get "even more" for your house than the last agent suggested. While this feels great at the time, you might find that same agent suggesting a price drop after 30,60,90 days might help sell the house.

Above Posted By: Chris | Sat, 22 Apr 2006 21:14:21 EST

An agent should not be paid full commission if his communication was nearly non-existent during the sale and it took months to sell at a fraction of what he or she had promised in the beginning.

Above Posted By: Janice | Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:19:28 EST

There should be alot more written on discount brokers and what they are about...What that 2 12% or 3% commission really means and what type of service the seller will be really receiving. Yes we now have the Competion Act but unfortunately this industry is cheapening itself with a flood of ads that looks more like "used car sales" ads...where is our professionalism that we have worked so hard to acheive over the years...going down the tubes! Look for 1-2% commisions coming soon.

Above Posted By: Gis | Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:43:48 EST

Very good article. Sellers should also ask listing prospective listing agents: 'If an offer comes in at 1% less than the listed price, how will you negotiate the offer? “ Fact: Most people think a house will sell for x dollars regardless of who sells it. Not true. Getting a weak agent to discount the commission usually means the seller will have a listing agent who is incapable of negotiating for them when low offers are presented. JB

Above Posted By: Jerry Bresser | Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:26:01 EST


Post A Comment

Please fill out the form below to submit a comment.

Name: 
(Required - Type Anonymous or Use First Name Only if Private)
Email Address: 
(Not Required So No Fake Emails Please.)
URL or Weblog:
(Leave Blank If You Don't Have One - Use http://)
Comments: 
(Please keep comments on topic. No HTML Allowed. No Advertisng.)
Please Note: Due to Comment Spam, all comments are reviewed by hand. Most comments will appear shortly after submission but it may take up to 12 hours to appear. If you would like to come back, click here to Bookmark the page.
PLEASE DO NOT USE ALL CAPS


Character Count =     (5000 Character Limit)

If you would like to leave a longer comment, please submit your comments in 5000 character increments and we will merge your comments.
Notify me via email when my comment is approved.


Note: Please don't bother spamming. All submissions are reviewed by our our editorial staff. Comment spam and irrelevant links will not be approved.

 




NEW VIDEO
Trump Talks Economy, Oil and Real Estate
New Evidence of Deceptive Practices at Countrywide


Reader Comments (More)
HOLY COW, people! Doesn't anybody with any common sense SEE what is going on in this country? With bank closings, our economy is s...
Read
Let’s face it. It seems that each time the government introduces new laws to combat real estate fraud someone introduces innovat...
Read
Alan hit the nail on the head. Reputable appraisers have seen the current debachle coming for years and been able to do nothing to...
Read
Home - Contact - Sitemap - Disclaimer - Privacy Statement - Advertising
All Content Copyright © 2003 - 2008 Brown House Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form without the express written permission of MortgageNewsDaily.com is prohibited.