Top News


Mortgage Rates
30 Yr FRM 5.32% -0.10%
15 Yr FRM 4.77% -0.10%
1 Yr ARM 4.94% 0.01%
5/1 Yr ARM 4.88% -0.11%
30 YR Tres 4.32% 0.00%
Fed Prime 3.25% 0.00%
Receive Free Email Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news and blog posts with our free News Alert Service.  Or if you are already a member, click here to login.

NAMB, Harvard Professor Dueling Over Op Ed Column

   |     Print   |     Bookmark

The National Association of Mortgage Brokers (NAMB) and many New England based mortgage brokers had a rude shock last week when a well known Harvard Law School professor slammed the profession on the Op Ed page of The Boston Globe.

Elizabeth Warren started her column, entitled "Mortgage brokers' sleight of hand" by saying;

"In the past five years, if you called a mortgage broker when you were about to buy or refinance a house you may have been told, 'We can check with lots of lenders so you'll get the best price.' Because you are a careful shopper, this sounds good - one-stop comparative shopping. The broker most likely didn't add, 'I'll take a bribe to steer you to the loan that is more expensive for you and more profitable for the lender.'"



Needless to say, mortgage professionals were immediately and absolutely outraged. But Professor Warren went on to say that, while a mortgage broker can be extremely helpful in guiding a borrower through a confusing transaction, "you are just as likely to encounter a broker who is working only for himself." Invoking the bribe word again she stated that some brokers will steer clients into higher-priced products than necessary given the clients income and credit score while selling the client on it being the best possible deal.

The Professor said that this practice of steering is so widespread that it has a name - "yield spread premium" while it is more truly a payment from the lender to the broker for selling the buyer a higher-priced loan.

The real kicker, Ms. Warren says, is that the homeowner/buyer will end up paying the "bribe" in the guise of additional fees and points added to the closing costs and buried in the closing documents.

She quotes a Fannie Mae vice president as describing the yield spread premium as a lender kickback but the process is perfectly legal and Congress and the few regulatory agencies involved in the non-federal portion of mortgage lending have "generally approved of yield spread premiums."

Professor Warren estimates that 85 to 90 percent of subprime mortgages involve some type of yield spread premium "which suggests that some brokers are needlessly pushing clients into more expensive products" and quotes Fannie Mae estimates that 50 percent of borrowers who were sold onerous subprime mortgages could have qualified for prime-rate loans. She stresses, however, that not only subprime borrowers fall victim to the practice and asks, "How many families are losing their homes because of the difference between paying 6.5 percent and 9.5 percent for the same loan?

We asked both NAMB and the Mortgage Brokers Association (MBA) for a comment on the Warren Op Ed. The MBA has not responded, however NAMB provided us with a letter written to The Boston Globe by George Hanzimanolis, president of the National Association and Rosemary O'Neil, president of Massachusetts Mortgage Association. The letter reads in part:

"In response to Elizabeth Warren's slanderous editorial (Mortgage Brokers' Sleight of Hand, October 2), let me (sic) say clearly and without equivocation: there is no place in the mortgage industry for those who commit fraud, accept bribes, or otherwise deceive consumers. That goes for lenders, brokers, and other loan originators.

But Ms Warren would blame only brokers for the mortgage industry meltdown, and this is certainly not the case.

Abuses that occur should be stopped. But let's not throw out valuable tools that can help people qualify for appropriate loans so they can get to the settlement table.

The Yield Spread Premium (YSP) is a good example. The Yield Spread Premium is the mechanism used industry-wide to customize each loan to a particular borrower's needs. It is not a bribe. It is a legal form of payment, recognized by HUD and verified by the courts. Its main purpose is to provide the consumer with the option of paying points to lower their rate or to increase their rate and pay no points. The yield spread allows the broker to do a loan with 0 points and be compensated by the lender for their services. Banks and credit unions offer the same pricing model. A consumer always pays a higher rate when they pay no points regardless of where they obtain their mortgage. This is a universal common practice."

The letter states that a broker is required by federal law to disclose the yield spread in the Good Faith Estimate provided to the borrower during the lending process and in the HUD-1 settlement statement at closing. Quite different, it says, from Ms. Warren's claim that the cost is "slipped into the closing documents."

It is a good bet that neither Professor Warren nor The Boston Globe has heard the end of this. We, however, are going to bide our time and bite our tongues except to say that we hope the many proposed changes in the laws on lending especially those relating to educating borrowers and clarifying lending disclosures will soon make the above controversy obsolete.

The article in the Boston Globe can be found here.


Comments

Join Now to Post Comments

George S.
on Thu, Oct 11 2007 7:00 AM
Fantastic article by Professor Warren. The G R E E D of brokers and loan originators is astonishing.
george
on Thu, Oct 11 2007 7:00 AM
In my 30 plus years in real estate I thought I'd heard it all. Being lectured on ethics by a lawyer is like being called ugly by a rhino. The Fed's policies, the big banks greed, all vanish as the independent brokers take the hit for the unscrupulous few. Want to solve the problem? Have consumers pay the fees directly, and upfront Maybe a retainer. Its been tried before. Guess what? The "something for nothing" crowd comes out swinging.There's no free lunch. Get over it.
Lucy Evei
on Thu, Oct 11 2007 7:00 AM
(YSP) This is payment made to the broker by the Lender for doing business with the Lender. This has nothing to do with Points. As you know the Mortgage Industry is very competitive and in order for us brokers to keep sending files to one Lenders we need to be compensated. This is not the cause of the mortgage meltdown. The meltdown was caused by sellers wanting too much for their properties and buyers wanting more than they could afford. (Supply and Demand)
Anonymous
on Thu, Oct 11 2007 7:00 AM
Mortgage Fraud expert and activist (and co-author of the new book, "Protect Yourself From Real Estate and Mortgage Fraud"), Ralph Roberts, has some thoughts on this as well. Earlier this week, on his "FlippingFrenzy" blog, Roberts wrote: "My conservative estimates target fraud as being responsible for at least 80% of the problem, and most of this fraud was perpetrated by industry insiders (both in the Real Estate and mortgage loan industries) on the consumers." Everyone should read it.
Appraiser
on Thu, Oct 11 2007 7:00 AM
Great story. Want more confirmation as to the problems that have caused this, soon to be economic crisis, Vist Appraisers Forum. Appraisers, RE Agents, Mortgage Brokers, Lenders, Wall Street ALL had a part in creating this crisis. Those in the forementioned fierlds that TRIED to be honest got slamed & lost work because of honesty & ethics, These are the ones that should be applauded cause they would not bend. However they'll be rolled into the blame with the rest.
john
on Thu, Oct 11 2007 7:00 AM
As a broker we are in a catch when it comes to compensation. We either charge the customer or get YSP. If the customer doesn't want to pay fees then we can adjust the rate of the loan to be compensated by the lender. This adjustment is NEVER the 3 pts used as an example in the article. We do have to get paid somewhere. We don't work for free. Maybe we should have a standard fee equivalant to the fee charged by real estate brokers,that alone would make alot of mortgage brokers real happy.
angie
on Thu, Oct 11 2007 7:00 AM
I work for a lender and I am PAID by the yeild spread..... 90% of customers do not want to pay an orgination point. I offer customers the rate with and without a point. The lending business is very competitive I don't know anyone who can afford to work for free. We are here to help the customers find the best rate and to make a living. I can't tell you how many home equity loans I have closed in Texas that I made 250.00 not 1000's of dollars.......
John
on Thu, Oct 11 2007 7:00 AM
As a wholesaler of Alt-A and A paper mortages in CA, it is remarkable to me that so-called "industry expert" Elizabeth Warren is given column space in a well-know and respected newspaper, and actually paid to write about a topic - in this case YSP - that she obviously doesn't understand. I say "boo" to her and her inciting and patently false analysis.
Bob S
on Fri, Oct 12 2007 7:00 AM
As a 30 year veteran of the mortgage industry, the only unscrupulous people tied to our business are the lawyers, many of which are taught by this person, to find ways to sue legitimate companies on technicalities and take millions of dollars in fee's. How about you attorneys taking 1% on what you win in litigation, instead of the 30-50% you actually take. It's like "the pot calling the kettle black".
Anonymous LO
on Mon, Oct 15 2007 7:00 AM
Wow... Even if I max out up front points on the front, maximize my YSP to the legal limit on a $417,000 loan and divide my commission split of that by the hours of work I've done for the customer, then I think I end up somewhere in the $125 per hour range. Fair money if your saving $500 per month on your new loan. Now let's compare $125 p/hour to my last retainer agreement for an attorney which was $300 p/hour. Oh yeah, I only charge fees if I succeed for them, not fail...So who's the real crook?
andy
on Tue, Oct 16 2007 7:00 AM
Professor Warrens was right on the money. The loud din from the mortgage hacks only fortifies my low opinion of that crowd. I dont think she went far enough though. Its not just the former used car salesman mortgage brokers that are at fault. The big box banks are just as bad because they indeed are the ring leaders in this scam.
Rex Lawler
on Wed, Oct 17 2007 7:00 AM
Those that can...do, those that can't...teach. And those that can't teach write op/ed pieces for major newpapers looking to draw attention to themselves. Shame on Ms. Warren!!
Arthur dArrigo
on Wed, Oct 17 2007 7:00 AM
YSP is symptomatic of larger problems within the RE/mortgage lending industry. And clearly, a vast majority of the brokers responding to this article don't get it. If you are in a fee for service business that fee should be borne by the party paying for the service. YSP muddles the clarity of the service and calls into question who the broker serves. Making loans where buyers closing costs are paid out of YSP is in many cases a fraud against the lender not charity. All parties share blame.
Matt
on Wed, Oct 17 2007 7:00 AM
I work at a title company and often times the YSP is the only way a broker can get paid, many borrowers can't afford to pay a dime in upfront fees. The broker sometimes pays all the fees from the YSP. We have closed loans that made only $86 net profit to the broker. Is that greed? I think it was charity.
Wade
on Wed, Oct 17 2007 7:00 AM
There is no way a broker would stear someone who qualifies for a prime loan to a subprime loan. Prime lenders pay much more YSP than subprime lenders and that's the way it's been for many years...at least in my state. If greed is the motivation, I'd put the borrower in a Prime loan any day. Make $750 to give someone a prime 6.875% rate or get $375 to give someone a sup-prime 10.875% rate? No brainer!
Natalie
on Wed, Oct 17 2007 7:00 AM
I have listened for months about mortgage brokers and banks actually being the culprits of the housing industry upset. Why has no one said anything about the builders who, have their own mortgage companies. Took great advantage of the housing boom, future priced homes they were selling. Taking deposits and offering financing terms at the time of contracts that were not what was presented to the buyers prior to closing. continued...
Natalie
on Wed, Oct 17 2007 7:00 AM
The buyers were threatened by the builders with their large deposits and thrown into crazy loans. Once the housing market started to faulter, the builders who long since made their money through the sale of the home AND the mortgage could afford to dump prices sometimes up to $100,000.00. What did this do to the others who purchase and then were transferred a year later, needless to say all the other homes in the area. The trickle down affect has been horrible.

Take a look at the subdivisions where new homes have closed in the last 2 years. How many of these are builder financed, now take a closer look? How many of those builder financed homes are in foreclosure? The builders have a very strong lobby because the employ so many people. Is this the reason this is not being looked at closer?
Roland
on Thu, Oct 18 2007 7:00 AM
It upsets me to see a story with so much inaccurate information published. While mortgage fraud is a concern and should be prosecuted, YSP is legitimate compensation that is FULLY disclosed to the borrower upfront on the GFE and at closing. It is a tool to reduce costs that would otherwise be born by the borrower and is already regulated and limited with other fees. Mortgage brokers receive more regulation, licensing, education and provide greater disclosures than required by most banks.
CTAN
on Thu, Oct 18 2007 7:00 AM
I think those who are upset about YSP being paid to a broker by a lender really dont understand how little a rate needs to be increased for the broker to be paid. I'm looking at todays rates with a lender I use often and I can offer a rate of 6.125 with the borrower paying 1 point up front or I can offer 6.375 with no point. Its the borrowers choice, you can do 6.25 and pay a 1/2 of a point for all I care its a better deal than you can get at your bank. This professor Warren chick is a fool
Anonymous
on Thu, Oct 18 2007 7:00 AM
I find it hard to believe that after 30 years in the mortgage industry Bob S. thinks lawyers are the unscruplous ones? I have investigated mortgage fraud for the last 11 years, and 2 out of three cases I see are broker related, not borrower, not attorney.... Ask anyone who works mortgage fraud in this industry as to who initiates the fraud and see what answers you get.
JD Rawcliffe, Esq.
on Fri, Oct 19 2007 7:00 AM
I didn't realize that Harvard Law had such ignorant professors!
SCOTT
on Fri, Oct 26 2007 7:00 AM
Unfortunately there was invasion of uneducated, greedy loan originators when the housing market boomed in 2004 and 2005. Consumers were blinded by the prospect of rapid appreciation and didn't pay attention to the potential long term commitment of a mortgage. Any one off the street could originate a loan. The slow down of the housing market has chased the rotten apples from business. Her comments are outdated and ignorant. In today's tight mortgage market, a broker's value is without limitation.
Robert
on Wed, Nov 21 2007 8:00 AM
It is unfortunate that an institute like Harvard is also put on the line by incompetent educators. One would expect an indication of a certain amount of research on the subject by the author. Is it not interesting that she quotes a Fannie Mae vice president about ysp. Why not state the name so we can verify the source? May be she herself received benefits from writting this article? Nobody else would make such inaccurate statements.