Learn. Share. Connect. (51,922 Members)  - Join
 


Site Tools

Join Now or Sign In
for Full Access to All Features
Mortgage Rates
30 Yr FRM 4.98% -0.05%
15 Yr FRM 4.40% -0.06%
1 Yr ARM 4.47% -0.10%
5/1 Yr ARM 4.35% -0.07%
30 YR Tres 4.40% -0.01%
Fed Prime 3.25% 0.00%
Receive Free Email Alerts
Stay up to date on breaking news and blog posts with our free News Alert Service

CITI Drops Opposition to Cramdown

by Jann Swanson on
 Email Page (New!)   |     Print   |     Bookmark

Citigroup and key Senate members reached an agreement on Thursday that will bring the Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy Act one step closer to passage.

The proposed law, introduced by Senator Durbin (D-IL) in the Senate and Rep. John Conyers (D-CA) in the House, would allow bankruptcy judges to alter or cramdown the terms of mortgages covering the homes of individuals in Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The court would be able to lower principal to reflect the actual current market value of the home, lower the interest rate, or extend the term of the loan.

Under current legislation, virtually every type of personal debt can be reduced by the court including credit card debt and, ironically, mortgage debt on vacation homes, but not the mortgage on a debtor's primary residence.  According to a press release from the office of Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) who has been working with Durbin on the legislation, this exception dates back to the 1970's when most mortgages were fixed-rate, long-term arrangements between local bankers and neighborhood customers, a situation which is rare today.

The Durbin-Conyers bill was reintroduced this week.  Durbin had originally filed it 14 months ago when an estimated 2 million homeowners were at risk of foreclosure.   That number has now quadrupled. 

Citigroup has agreed to support the legislation with three modifications:  only existing mortgages would be eligible; homeowners would be required to certify that they attempted to contact their lender regarding loan modifications before filing for bankruptcy; and only major violations of the Truth in Lending (TILA) would invalidate creditor claims in bankruptcy rather than TILA violations of any size.

Citigroup has been a strong opponent of the legislation which Durbin hopes will become part of the $800 trillion economic stimulus act.  The company's change of heart may be a result of the billions in bailout funds it has received in the last few months.  Other major banks such as J.P. Morgan and Wells Fargo as well as the Mortgage Bankers Association are still opposed to the bill.

Senator Durbin said of the agreement with Citi, "The support of one of the county's biggest lenders will hopefully spur other lenders to act. I applaud Citigroup for supporting what is in the interests of their customers as well as their own best interests as a financial institution, and I hope others will quickly follow in their footsteps. We can't end the economic crisis until we address its root cause: the massive housing crisis facing our nation."

The Republican leadership has not yet weighed in on the Citigroup agreement.


Comments

Join Now or Login to Post Comments

on
It would seem like to me that there should be amendment to this bill that would include that any principal that was written down, that when the home is sold in the future and any appreciated and equity built in the home would be repayed backed to the lender and/or governement. ie Home has principal reduced $100k in 2009 to the market value of $250k Home is sold in 2020 for $360k. Should the owner of the home really be allowed to pocket $110k in equity?
on
The American people are the real victims of what has happened in the economy. As a twenty year veteran of mortgage lending I knew for years that the lending practices were far to risky and chose not to participate during that period of time. All the potential home buyer saw was that they were going to have the opportunity to achieve "The American Dream". What happened to the days of responsible lending practices. I guess they went out the door when the mortgage lending industry figured out they could sell those risky loans to Wall Street.
on
I purchased my home in Nevada in 2005 before i even made my first payment my loan was sold and sold again!! Iam so flippin sick of the whinning from ppl saying we shouldnt be able to get relief because , we pay our mortgage . hey guess what assholes so did I until I was laid off and my home value drooped over a 100k so I should continue paying 1,500 on a house that's current market price is 119 k and it being rented for 700 dollars?? Or is that iam just a lazy *** and its my fault that the shady ,crooked lenders out here in Vegas making a buck sold bullshit loans because they had no regulations and a pass to do what the hell they wanted???Iam all for the ''cramdown '' and best believe iam filing 13 !! as for the repercussions for first time buyers, home values , tighter lending??!! who are we kidding the banks arent lending to anyone anymore no matter what your credit score is!! I believe firmly that all the mortgage companies and their shady practices should face criminal charges!! how about taking some responsibility for this mess?? and support help to the people that were bent over by fha loans ??? and yes I should be able to recover equity in the time of sell. It's my money that I have been throwing away every fucking month on a house that isnt worth the first or second lien!1